What's going on with FCV GA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep telling yourself that as you buy more merch at the ecnl store to stay warm riding the pine

Syc, VRSC, FCV < Arlington, Union, NVA, VDA

Can't make blanket statements like that, as you certainly know it varies by team/age group.

SYC 2012 could beat done if the ecnl teams. That would be the only one. It doesn’t vary.

All depends on the age group. In the oldest groups (06 through 08), I think FCV could beat many/most of the ECNL teams. Same with the the 2010s as well. SYC 2012 as you noted could win too. So, like I mentioned previously, the blanket statement isn't true, as the variance is significant year to year.

FCV 06, 07, 08, 10 can beat most of the ecnl teams in nova? Please stop.

Just admit it ECNL dad, FCV breaking up is the best thing for your fragile ego. Next season none of the 3 GA teams will be at the same level that FCV is currently at and you can go back to your chest thumping "EcNl Is BeTtEr ThAn gA" and shout that from the roof tops. I do know this, several ECNL teams will be better next season because of the talented FCV players they were able to add and I don't know a single FCV player that is leaving the GA and accepted an RL offer, most if not all went NL, so i guess the GA players weren't as inferior as you thought.

Let’s see how they perform outside of the FCV structure against better competition week in and week out. Some will perform. Most will be exposed.

This is how you talk about children? What is wrong with you?

It’s a VDA parent. WT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep telling yourself that as you buy more merch at the ecnl store to stay warm riding the pine

Syc, VRSC, FCV < Arlington, Union, NVA, VDA

Can't make blanket statements like that, as you certainly know it varies by team/age group.

SYC 2012 could beat done if the ecnl teams. That would be the only one. It doesn’t vary.

All depends on the age group. In the oldest groups (06 through 08), I think FCV could beat many/most of the ECNL teams. Same with the the 2010s as well. SYC 2012 as you noted could win too. So, like I mentioned previously, the blanket statement isn't true, as the variance is significant year to year.

FCV 06, 07, 08, 10 can beat most of the ecnl teams in nova? Please stop.

Just admit it ECNL dad, FCV breaking up is the best thing for your fragile ego. Next season none of the 3 GA teams will be at the same level that FCV is currently at and you can go back to your chest thumping "EcNl Is BeTtEr ThAn gA" and shout that from the roof tops. I do know this, several ECNL teams will be better next season because of the talented FCV players they were able to add and I don't know a single FCV player that is leaving the GA and accepted an RL offer, most if not all went NL, so i guess the GA players weren't as inferior as you thought.

Let’s see how they perform outside of the FCV structure against better competition week in and week out. Some will perform. Most will be exposed.

Like at WAGS where every FCV team played in the top bracket w/ the 10s beating FC Delco, Arlington and Ukies (ECNL next season) or the 09s and 08s that played up a year and went 5-1 combined or the 05/06s that went undefeated and beat McLean ECNL? like that level of competition? Or the 10s that beat Bethesda in a tournament?

None of that is relevant vs. week in and week out league play. If FCV was so elite, why did it all fall apart so quickly?

Cherry picking tournament results is cute. What about all of those GA teams that beat you in ga league play and get dominated by ECNL teams and showcases?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
NP. FCV has had a long reputation for developing great players. It seems to me that nothing has taken that playbook away from them. They just need to define what success will look like going forward. If you measure success by outcomes next season with new teams, sure there will probably be some hiccups. If you measure success by the growth of the players and teams through the season and beyond, that legacy can continue today. As a parent I care a lot more about my player’s growth and their positive and healthy club experience, and a lot less about vicarious chest-thumping over tourny wins.

The playbook? Not a single person involved in that long reputation is still there. Every single coach, director, management left. Not even the players are there to carry on a culture. Doesn't mean the new regime won't eventually have some success. But to say there is a playbook or track record is not true.

Every organization experiences turnover and many survive. Organizational practices and processes are institutionalized through records and training. So yes they should very much have the playbook even if people left. And if they don’t
that would be a sign the club was in disarray for a very, very long time with the old guard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep telling yourself that as you buy more merch at the ecnl store to stay warm riding the pine

Syc, VRSC, FCV < Arlington, Union, NVA, VDA

Can't make blanket statements like that, as you certainly know it varies by team/age group.

SYC 2012 could beat done if the ecnl teams. That would be the only one. It doesn’t vary.

All depends on the age group. In the oldest groups (06 through 08), I think FCV could beat many/most of the ECNL teams. Same with the the 2010s as well. SYC 2012 as you noted could win too. So, like I mentioned previously, the blanket statement isn't true, as the variance is significant year to year.

FCV 06, 07, 08, 10 can beat most of the ecnl teams in nova? Please stop.

Just admit it ECNL dad, FCV breaking up is the best thing for your fragile ego. Next season none of the 3 GA teams will be at the same level that FCV is currently at and you can go back to your chest thumping "EcNl Is BeTtEr ThAn gA" and shout that from the roof tops. I do know this, several ECNL teams will be better next season because of the talented FCV players they were able to add and I don't know a single FCV player that is leaving the GA and accepted an RL offer, most if not all went NL, so i guess the GA players weren't as inferior as you thought.

Let’s see how they perform outside of the FCV structure against better competition week in and week out. Some will perform. Most will be exposed.

Like at WAGS where every FCV team played in the top bracket w/ the 10s beating FC Delco, Arlington and Ukies (ECNL next season) or the 09s and 08s that played up a year and went 5-1 combined or the 05/06s that went undefeated and beat McLean ECNL? like that level of competition? Or the 10s that beat Bethesda in a tournament?

None of that is relevant vs. week in and week out league play. If FCV was so elite, why did it all fall apart so quickly?

Cherry picking tournament results is cute. What about all of those GA teams that beat you in ga league play and get dominated by ECNL teams and showcases?

Check out the standings though. 06s and 08s are undefeated in league play. 07s are 12-2-1.

[Anonymous]

It’s not cherry picking results if that’s the only time these teams get to compete against each other. Last chance to play Bethesda was Virginian spring last year, beat them in finals. Handled other ECNL teams in OBGC also this last fall… where are these overpowering 2010 ECNL teams at.. NVA won’t play FCV… they actually got 2nd in OBGC against a weak ECNL team… in the second division.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
NP. FCV has had a long reputation for developing great players. It seems to me that nothing has taken that playbook away from them. They just need to define what success will look like going forward. If you measure success by outcomes next season with new teams, sure there will probably be some hiccups. If you measure success by the growth of the players and teams through the season and beyond, that legacy can continue today. As a parent I care a lot more about my player’s growth and their positive and healthy club experience, and a lot less about vicarious chest-thumping over tourny wins.

The playbook? Not a single person involved in that long reputation is still there. Every single coach, director, management left.

but u could fix it and be the hero they need https://www.soccerwire.com/tryout-camp/tsjfcv-hiring-travel-soccer-coaches/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not cherry picking results if that’s the only time these teams get to compete against each other. Last chance to play Bethesda was Virginian spring last year, beat them in finals. Handled other ECNL teams in OBGC also this last fall… where are these overpowering 2010 ECNL teams at.. NVA won’t play FCV… they actually got 2nd in OBGC against a weak ECNL team… in the second division.

Meaningless tournament wins by middle schoolers is really not the flex you think it is. Keep believing. We rely on delusional parents like you to keep the money flowing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep telling yourself that as you buy more merch at the ecnl store to stay warm riding the pine

Syc, VRSC, FCV < Arlington, Union, NVA, VDA

Can't make blanket statements like that, as you certainly know it varies by team/age group.

SYC 2012 could beat done if the ecnl teams. That would be the only one. It doesn’t vary.

All depends on the age group. In the oldest groups (06 through 08), I think FCV could beat many/most of the ECNL teams. Same with the the 2010s as well. SYC 2012 as you noted could win too. So, like I mentioned previously, the blanket statement isn't true, as the variance is significant year to year.

FCV 06, 07, 08, 10 can beat most of the ecnl teams in nova? Please stop.

Just admit it ECNL dad, FCV breaking up is the best thing for your fragile ego. Next season none of the 3 GA teams will be at the same level that FCV is currently at and you can go back to your chest thumping "EcNl Is BeTtEr ThAn gA" and shout that from the roof tops. I do know this, several ECNL teams will be better next season because of the talented FCV players they were able to add and I don't know a single FCV player that is leaving the GA and accepted an RL offer, most if not all went NL, so i guess the GA players weren't as inferior as you thought.

Let’s see how they perform outside of the FCV structure against better competition week in and week out. Some will perform. Most will be exposed.

Like at WAGS where every FCV team played in the top bracket w/ the 10s beating FC Delco, Arlington and Ukies (ECNL next season) or the 09s and 08s that played up a year and went 5-1 combined or the 05/06s that went undefeated and beat McLean ECNL? like that level of competition? Or the 10s that beat Bethesda in a tournament?

None of that is relevant vs. week in and week out league play. If FCV was so elite, why did it all fall apart so quickly?

You're not very bright, are you?

Maybe but I know that the 20/80 rule applied to FCV. 20 was good enough to compete and 80 were not or role players.

All teams, I repeat all teams, have role players. The best professional teams in the world have role players. Good youth teams in this area, the best youth teams in the country, have role players. You can't have a good, or great team without role players.