GDS Student Newspaper posts about the horrible incident

[Anonymous]

Evidence like literally anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't a crime for gds to themselves investigate or to determine who gets questioned. Administrators are not private investigators. They don't know how to ask questions that can tease out if a kid has been coached, is lying, etc. investigators do. Trust me, anyone MPD wanted to question, they did. GDS called MPD, CPS and a private firm. They did what they were supposed to do.

A private firm with Epstein ties where the boss of the "investigator" is sexting with ladies that don't want to sext with him. This is like OJ investigating the Nicole Brown Simpson murder.

And what about MPD and CPS? Do they too have Epstein ties? What about those investigations? Why is this private investigator firm the hill people want to die on here? Why aren't those reports good enough to go on and think this private report makes or breaks the case. There is no case without evidence people. It's an 11 year olds word against no one's. I want to know how it took the parents 3 months to notice something had happened to their child. 11 year olds are not good at hiding things. I'm not saying it did or didn't happen but what I am saying is, this feels flimsy hence why they didn't file a lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Luckily we are not applying to GDS. Not because of the rape, but because of the obnoxious parents that think they know everything.

[Anonymous]

Eww. I heard application numbers are up so I doubt they will suffer. "Yes, I'd love to join GDS and be in this allegedly unsafe environment. Sign me up! Also can I make an extra large donation?"

[Anonymous]

The real question is whether GDS performed a legitimate investigation or was only concerned about limiting their legal exposure here. Their unwillingness to share their independent investigation, the T&M documents, with the victim and their unwillingness to publicly explain what their investigation entailed, providing no details, suggests it was all a cover up. In addition, any leads that might help the criminal case would be contained in the T&M document, which they will not share.


The answers everyone wants are in the T&M report / documents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.

While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.

While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.

Exactly this. Long time GDS parent here. 100 percent agree. How do we let our displeasure be known?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn't a crime for gds to themselves investigate or to determine who gets questioned. Administrators are not private investigators. They don't know how to ask questions that can tease out if a kid has been coached, is lying, etc. investigators do. Trust me, anyone MPD wanted to question, they did. GDS called MPD, CPS and a private firm. They did what they were supposed to do.

A private firm with Epstein ties where the boss of the "investigator" is sexting with ladies that don't want to sext with him. This is like OJ investigating the Nicole Brown Simpson murder.

And what about MPD and CPS? Do they too have Epstein ties? What about those investigations? Why is this private investigator firm the hill people want to die on here? Why aren't those reports good enough to go on and think this private report makes or breaks the case. There is no case without evidence people. It's an 11 year olds word against no one's. I want to know how it took the parents 3 months to notice something had happened to their child. 11 year olds are not good at hiding things. I'm not saying it did or didn't happen but what I am saying is, this feels flimsy hence why they didn't file a lawsuit.

The school could have been transparent about an alleged incident and the investigation and safety improvements even if the perpetrators were never identified. They could have used their own consent culture materials to reinforce that message with students. They could have modeled respect and compassion for the victim and his family. Yet they chose to do none of those things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.

While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.

Exactly this. Long time GDS parent here. 100 percent agree. How do we let our displeasure be known?

I have no connection with GDS whatsoever, but the answer to your question is obvious. Ask for a meeting with the HOS and demand answers to your questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Eww. I heard application numbers are up so I doubt they will suffer. "Yes, I'd love to join GDS and be in this allegedly unsafe environment. Sign me up! Also can I make an extra large donation?"

You doubt they'll suffer?! If this is true, they could have a potential lawsuit on their hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Alleged victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.

While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.

All of this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Should they have rounded up every seventh and grade boy and accused them individually? If there had been an immediate claim, something could have been done. But that didn't happen. And that unfortunately means that the allegation cannot be proved at this time unless a credible lead emerges. And it appears that one has not.

While we would have liked the case to be solved, most of the anger is about how GDS has mishandled their response. The company they hired for their “independent investigation.” Their secrecy about what exactly that investigation was and the results. In addition to their awful forced statements. Being unwilling to share info with the victim and his family.

Exactly this. Long time GDS parent here. 100 percent agree. How do we let our displeasure be known?

I have no connection with GDS whatsoever, but the answer to your question is obvious. Ask for a meeting with the HOS and demand answers to your questions.

Silly. Anyone will just be blown off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is s case of sweeping under the carpet Deny, deny, deny --and demand evidence that the victim could not provide.

Alleged victim.

If they have evidence that this was made up then they should spit it out. The family opened themselves up with the email and GDS has every incentive under the sun to show that it was false or exaggerated.

That's only an argument in favor of releasing the report. The report is more likely to exonerate the school than not.