Official Kamala Harris VP Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shapiro did not say he is out. Shapiro clearly wants it but imo he is trying to hard. It’s like he’s studied Obama and is desperate to emulate him - he’s good, quite good, but Pete is better and authentic.

What about the sexual harassment claim he settled last year? I’m sure that would resurface and it’s not a good look for Dems.

T-V does not want to run against Harris-Shapiro. Look for any wrongdoings by Shapiro to surface, all pushed by none other than your twice-impeached convicted felon orange clown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It should be Whitmer. alas, a two women ticket will only happen in another 96 years or so.

+1 fingers crossed she’ll be heading the ticket in 4 or 8 years

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It should be Whitmer. alas, a two women ticket will only happen in another 96 years or so.

+1 fingers crossed she’ll be heading the ticket in 4 or 8 years

Not sure she wants it that much though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It should be Whitmer. alas, a two women ticket will only happen in another 96 years or so.

+10000
I think there is so much energy right now that a two-woman ticket would work. It’s infuriating that not even one woman is being considered on the short list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shapiro did not say he is out. Shapiro clearly wants it but imo he is trying to hard. It’s like he’s studied Obama and is desperate to emulate him - he’s good, quite good, but Pete is better and authentic.

What about the sexual harassment claim he settled last year? I’m sure that would resurface and it’s not a good look for Dems.

This and his handling of the Gaza protests could be a problem

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shapiro did not say he is out. Shapiro clearly wants it but imo he is trying to hard. It’s like he’s studied Obama and is desperate to emulate him - he’s good, quite good, but Pete is better and authentic.

What about the sexual harassment claim he settled last year? I’m sure that would resurface and it’s not a good look for Dems.

T-V does not want to run against Harris-Shapiro. Look for any wrongdoings by Shapiro to surface, all pushed by none other than your twice-impeached convicted felon orange clown.

Yep. Just saw an anti-Shapiro ad on CNN by a PA-based RW organization.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It should be Whitmer. alas, a two women ticket will only happen in another 96 years or so.

+10000
I think there is so much energy right now that a two-woman ticket would work. It’s infuriating that not even one woman is being considered on the short list.

I'm going summon my inner Carville now and say it would be a mistake to use this weeks excitement to determine the VP pick. It would be a mistake to use the VP pick to prove how progressive we are.
The pick needs to move the needle in multiple demographics/ states and not lose votes .
Whitmer doesn't do that.
Buttigeg doesn't do that.
Shapiro doesn't do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It should be Whitmer. alas, a two women ticket will only happen in another 96 years or so.

+10000
I think there is so much energy right now that a two-woman ticket would work. It’s infuriating that not even one woman is being considered on the short list.

I'm going summon my inner Carville now and say it would be a mistake to use this weeks excitement to determine the VP pick. It would be a mistake to use the VP pick to prove how progressive we are.
The pick needs to move the needle in multiple demographics/ states and not lose votes .
Whitmer doesn't do that.
Buttigeg doesn't do that.
Shapiro doesn't do that.

Mark Kelly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shapiro did not say he is out. Shapiro clearly wants it but imo he is trying to hard. It’s like he’s studied Obama and is desperate to emulate him - he’s good, quite good, but Pete is better and authentic.

What about the sexual harassment claim he settled last year? I’m sure that would resurface and it’s not a good look for Dems.

T-V does not want to run against Harris-Shapiro. Look for any wrongdoings by Shapiro to surface, all pushed by none other than your twice-impeached convicted felon orange clown.

Yep. Just saw an anti-Shapiro ad on CNN by a PA-based RW organization.

It's a mistake to think that such an add means they don't want that ticket.
They are going to attack any potential candidate.
It's also a mistake to choose based on who they don't want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It should be Whitmer. alas, a two women ticket will only happen in another 96 years or so.

+10000
I think there is so much energy right now that a two-woman ticket would work. It’s infuriating that not even one woman is being considered on the short list.

I'm going summon my inner Carville now and say it would be a mistake to use this weeks excitement to determine the VP pick. It would be a mistake to use the VP pick to prove how progressive we are.
The pick needs to move the needle in multiple demographics/ states and not lose votes .
Whitmer doesn't do that.
Buttigeg doesn't do that.
Shapiro doesn't do that.

Mark Kelly.

Kelly is my top with Walz as number 2. Beshear a distant 3. Like Cooper, but truly can't risk him leaving NC.

For what it's worth Kelly seems to be very popular with the public at least in my area of the country. Not in a swing states but I do live in an area that's heavily populated by a demographic we need to win over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It should be Whitmer. alas, a two women ticket will only happen in another 96 years or so.

+10000
I think there is so much energy right now that a two-woman ticket would work. It’s infuriating that not even one woman is being considered on the short list.

I'm going summon my inner Carville now and say it would be a mistake to use this weeks excitement to determine the VP pick. It would be a mistake to use the VP pick to prove how progressive we are.
The pick needs to move the needle in multiple demographics/ states and not lose votes .
Whitmer doesn't do that.
Buttigeg doesn't do that.
Shapiro doesn't do that.

Mark Kelly.

Kelly is my top with Walz as number 2. Beshear a distant 3. Like Cooper, but truly can't risk him leaving NC.

For what it's worth Kelly seems to be very popular with the public at least in my area of the country. Not in a swing states but I do live in an area that's heavily populated by a demographic we need to win over.

Don’t think there is any way they’ll risk his seat, not with a solid alternative like Walz available. Whom unions like.

[Anonymous]

The Trump campaign seems most threatened by Shapiro and Walz, which is telling. I don’t think they’ll go with a Jewish running mate at this moment in time though.

[Anonymous]

Has anyone seen Kamala with any of these prospects? Curious about personal chemistry.

[Anonymous]

In terms of the broadest national appeal, it’s Kelly followed by Walz imo. They speak like authentic regular people ordinary Americans can relate to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In terms of the broadest national appeal, it’s Kelly followed by Walz imo. They speak like authentic regular people ordinary Americans can relate to.

Agreed. Anecdotally these are the names I hear most in conversation.