
If colleges are relying on essay responses about URM life experiences rather than URM status, would that reduce the pool of identified-URMs (for lack of a better term; i.e., those known to the admissions office) within the college's broader applicant pool, and accordingly increase the chances for those particular URM applicants? |
Slavery vastly is different than war. In slavery, you have to convince a group of people that they are in fact not people at all but are property. The psychological warfare over hundreds of years that includes splitting up and selling family members is nothing like war. The fact that you made these comments shows that you are completely unaware. It is disgusting. Ignorant liberals know nothing about the world history of colonialism. There was plenty of oppression that Asians suffered due to race in the US and around the world that prevented them from participating in US rights and benefits as well. And lots of history of Black Africans ethnically cleansing Asians in a racist way when their countries got independence. So spare me the afro-centeic interpretation of oppression. If you go back in history long enough every race and each person's ancestors were enslaved or oppressed in some way. The world literacy rate has been low through most of history. |
I think people are overestimating this dynamic-they said if race plays a role in their appealing personal story (the same way other experiences can illustrate a quality colleges want) that’s fine but the schools clearly need to be substantively in compliance-it’s not like people can do jazz hands “and I’m Black” in the essay and colleges will snap them up. |
Not a coincidence that there are many coed colleges where the female population is higher than males since AA was instituted. Yes, majority are white women. William and Mary is an example. |
Race/%college/%USpopulation Asian: .59*.08= 4.7% = 4.7/41.5 =11.3% White: .42*.59=24.8% = 59.7 Black: .37*.14= 5.2% = 12.5 Hispanic: .36*.19= 6.8% = 16.4 The last column is the answer you’re seeking. If college demographics at every college reflected both a race’s college-going rate and their representation in the US, the racial profile would be Asian 11%, White 60%, Black 13%, and Hispanic 16%. |
I am also curious how this effect college admissions in the coming years. I just went through this process this year. I have another in two years.
I'm not sure how the SCOTUS ruling will change the college admissions process. Some have posted opinions that not much will change. Others think it will benefit those outside of "rich" zip codes. All my life I was told good grades and a good SAT/ACT score will get you into a good school "granted - I am old". I think that is still true, although getting into even a great state school is difficult. Inflated grades from publics, test optional now seem to the new norm. I'm of the opinion that college admissions are now the same as buying a lottery ticket. GPAs and SAT/ACT scores no longer matter. |
But blacks and Hispanics disproportionately go to less competitive and for-profit colleges and Asians disproportionately go to competitive admission colleges. Races are not applying proportionately to competitive colleges. |
In a communist society maybe. We ain't one.. |
White women are represented in colleges at the rates you would expect based on their academic credentials; there’s no affirmative action. |
Circular. It would be constitutional for all colleges to bar all students of any given race, because then the college-going population of that race would be zero. |
It might just be that the resume of many asians look the same, they have tiger-mom'd their way towards college and all have done very similar stuff for their resume. Just like a lot of rich white kids have done. Want to gain admissions, be different. Fact is 96% get rejected and probably 90-95% of those would all make excellent candidates but obviously not all can get selected |
+1 |