I don't know if these alleged texts are real (CNN version are mockuos with text from the charging documents)
but the conversation is absolutely normal youg adult texting with a mixture of formal and informal style / grammar / punctuation. The strangest part is how long some of the messages are, for being phone messages. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/16/us/text-message-tyler-robinson-roomate-vis |
If the roommate isn't trans, the roommate is still apparently AMAB and the alleged messages from Tyler Robinson say "my love". When one person in a huge MAGA family is anti-MAGA, as alleged, it's often a closed non-cis-hetero person. |
So we went from he’s a terminally online failure to launch mentally ill immature weirdo addicted to videos games… to 22-yo “grown man” who uses perfect English and sounds like a middle aged dweeb when informally texting his transsexual gamer bf. lol |
Or everyone involved is foreign intel, Feds and assets. |
And remember he is still alive, so he can speak for himself. |
Shhhh! No one here care about reality PP! |
What partner? What roommate? What gun? What text hikes, hahaha? |
😂😂😂😂 “How long have you been planning this?” “a bit over a week I believe. …” Just no. So he left a note under the computer? If he ran to his car, why would he drop the gun in a random location if he wanted to get it? The guy running across the roof wasn’t carrying a gun, so then it was in his backpack (which people say is impossible). Then he’s going to turn himself in to a neighbor sheriff deputy, but his dad had been actual sheriff. I believed this was cut and dry the day he turned himself in, but the more the FBI posts, the less I believe anything. |
What a joke. This looks like it was written by some old retiring dude at the FBI headquarters. |
Why the Conversation is Stilted and Unnatural:
* Repetitive and Redundant Dialogue: The back-and-forth is overly simplistic and repetitive. For example, the "Why? Why did I do it? Yeah" sequence is unnatural. A real conversation would likely have more flowing questions and answers. * Monologue-like Dialogue: The character "Robinson" delivers long, unbroken monologues that sound more like a narrative description or an internal thought process rather than spoken words. People don't typically speak in such long, grammatically correct paragraphs in casual conversation. The long explanation about the "rifle wrapped in a towel" and the "engraving bullets" is a perfect example of this. * Excessive Exposition: The dialogue serves primarily to dump information on the reader, rather than to move the plot or reveal character naturally. For instance, Robinson's first long speech is a detailed explanation of why they can't come home and a confession of a "secret" they've kept. This is a very direct way of providing backstory, which is typical of amateur writing. * Unrealistic Emotional Reactions: The character "Roommate" seems to have a very muted and simplistic emotional response. Their initial reaction is "What????????" but then their subsequent questions are very direct and lack genuine emotional weight ("Why?", "How long have you been planning this?"). A real person's reactions would likely be more complex and emotionally charged, especially when confronted with such a bizarre situation involving a "rifle" and "engraving bullets." * "Show, Don't Tell" Problem: The dialogue explicitly "tells" the reader what's happening and what the characters are thinking, instead of "showing" it through action or more nuanced dialogue. The line "I had enough of his hatred" is a statement that would more likely be expressed through action or a more subtle dialogue. * Odd Phrasing and Tone: The conversation uses phrases that feel a bit theatrical or overly dramatic, like "I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out." This sounds more like a line from a low-budget movie script than a spontaneous conversation. The sudden switch to a "meme" and "fox news" references at the end also feels jarring and out of place. Conclusion: Is it More Probable that Somebody Made This? Yes, it is highly probable that this conversation was written by someone rather than being a genuine, transcribed conversation. This text exhibits classic characteristics of amateur creative writing, often seen in stories, scripts, or role-playing scenarios: * It prioritizes plot over realism. The primary goal is to deliver key plot points (the rifle, the secret, the problem with retrieving it) rather than to capture the nuances of human interaction. * The characters are vehicles for exposition. They exist to explain the situation to the reader, not to behave like real people. Copy pasted from AI. Removed comments of the formatting of the transcription. |
Nope, no way. Immediately, from “drop what you’re doing.” Just no. I don’t believe those are real. |
Kash Patel is actually a fiction writer, has a children’s book out, so…. |