Reply to Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Why the Conversation is Stilted and Unnatural:
 
 * Repetitive and Redundant Dialogue: The back-and-forth is overly simplistic and repetitive. For example, the "Why? Why did I do it? Yeah" sequence is unnatural. A real conversation would likely have more flowing questions and answers.

* Monologue-like Dialogue: The character "Robinson" delivers long, unbroken monologues that sound more like a narrative description or an internal thought process rather than spoken words. People don't typically speak in such long, grammatically correct paragraphs in casual conversation. The long explanation about the "rifle wrapped in a towel" and the "engraving bullets" is a perfect example of this.

* Excessive Exposition: The dialogue serves primarily to dump information on the reader, rather than to move the plot or reveal character naturally. For instance, Robinson's first long speech is a detailed explanation of why they can't come home and a confession of a "secret" they've kept. This is a very direct way of providing backstory, which is typical of amateur writing.

* Unrealistic Emotional Reactions: The character "Roommate" seems to have a very muted and simplistic emotional response. Their initial reaction is "What????????" but then their subsequent questions are very direct and lack genuine emotional weight ("Why?", "How long have you been planning this?"). A real person's reactions would likely be more complex and emotionally charged, especially when confronted with such a bizarre situation involving a "rifle" and "engraving bullets."

* "Show, Don't Tell" Problem: The dialogue explicitly "tells" the reader what's happening and what the characters are thinking, instead of "showing" it through action or more nuanced dialogue. The line "I had enough of his hatred" is a statement that would more likely be expressed through action or a more subtle dialogue.

* Odd Phrasing and Tone: The conversation uses phrases that feel a bit theatrical or overly dramatic, like "I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out." This sounds more like a line from a low-budget movie script than a spontaneous conversation. The sudden switch to a "meme" and "fox news" references at the end also feels jarring and out of place.

Conclusion: Is it More Probable that Somebody Made This?
Yes, it is highly probable that this conversation was written by someone rather than being a genuine, transcribed conversation.

This text exhibits classic characteristics of amateur creative writing, often seen in stories, scripts, or role-playing scenarios:
 * It prioritizes plot over realism. The primary goal is to deliver key plot points (the rifle, the secret, the problem with retrieving it) rather than to capture the nuances of human interaction.
 * The characters are vehicles for exposition. They exist to explain the situation to the reader, not to behave like real people.

Copy pasted from AI.

Removed comments of the formatting of the transcription.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics