War with Iran Part II

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is Kushner representing?

His financial interests.

You're making him sound like Steve Witkoff. No, it's very clear that Kushner is a very good mensch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Kushner representing?

Israel, duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Kushner representing?

Real estate and investors deal, just like Gaza water front development plan.

[Anonymous]

USA keeps saying they sent two navy warships through strait to remove mines. Apparently these two ships don’t have that capability, so that’s a lie.
The strait is still closed, despite peace talks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is Kushner representing?

His financial interests.

You're making him sound like Steve Witkoff. No, it's very clear that Kushner is a very good mensch.

Uh, there is literally no way you could EVER convince me of that. I’m sorry you’ve been fooled. He has no business there and is just trying to exploit USA to make a profit.

[Anonymous]

Survivors of the deadly Iranian attack that killed six U.S. soldiers say Pete Hegseth's description of the incident "is a falsehood."

https://www.themirror.com/news/politics/us-army-survivors-reveal-slain-1782321?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Threads#Echobox=1775937063-1

[Anonymous]

Everybody, Great News. No reason for GayDee and the 3 Mossad agents to be in Pakistan. Perhaps they can take a victory lap through the Strait of Hormuz on their way back.


Trump says ‘we win’ regardless of whether Iran makes a deal
https://aje.news/ndjgyz?update=4484087

The US president has addressed the latest talks in Iran, saying, “Regardless of what happens, we win.”

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump added, “We’ve totally defeated that country. So let’s see what happens: Maybe they make a deal, maybe they don’t. It doesn’t matter. From the standpoint of America, we win.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everybody, Great News. No reason for GayDee and the 3 Mossad agents to be in Pakistan. Perhaps they can take a victory lap through the Strait of Hormuz on their way back.


Trump says ‘we win’ regardless of whether Iran makes a deal
https://aje.news/ndjgyz?update=4484087

The US president has addressed the latest talks in Iran, saying, “Regardless of what happens, we win.”

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump added, “We’ve totally defeated that country. So let’s see what happens: Maybe they make a deal, maybe they don’t. It doesn’t matter. From the standpoint of America, we win.”

He's an entire Happy Meal short of a Happy Meal.

[Anonymous]

House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems:

"This delegation includes the president's son-in-law and his real estate developer golf buddy — the same two whose last "diplomatic" effort was cover for starting this pointless and costly war.

Not a great way to signal a diplomat reset."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it really the Republicans? It’s the Israelis. Just SAY IT.

Republicans could have ended this in the 2016 primary, the 2020 primary the 2024 primary and two shots of impeachment and failed.

Miriam Adelson is the Kingmaker.

Before Miriam became the Queen maker, her husband Sheldon shared that title with the Koch brothers. They are all gone. Who will replace Miriam, because she is close to death herself

Timothy Mellon, Ken Griffen, Elon Musk, former playboy bunny Dianne Hendricks, Liz and Dick Uihlein, Kelly Loehfler, Woody Johnson, the Winklevoss twins, the Sackler family - basically the entire billionaire class is MAGA and own the Republican Party.

The Billionaire class or the Epstein class own both sides of the political aisle.
They give you a choice of chocolate or vanilla.
Then you are a good boy/girl.

[Anonymous]

High-level direct negotiations between the United States and Iran grew tense on Saturday in Pakistan's capital.

The highest-level face-to-face meetings between the two countries since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, are mediated by Pakistani officials and aim to strengthen a fragile ceasefire that ended a six-week regional conflict.

US Vice President JD Vance leads the American side, joined by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Iran's delegation includes senior officials such as Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.

Sessions continued into late night with multiple rounds, including trilateral discussions. Reports cite rising tensions over control of the Strait of Hormuz, frozen Iranian assets, sanctions relief, and the ceasefire's scope regarding Lebanon.

Heavy security measures remain in place across Islamabad. No agreement has been announced as of Saturday evening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was originally slated to go, Vance was unable for “security reasons”. Then suddenly they send Vance. I think they know it’s hopeless and trump doesn’t care about Vance’s future. He wants him to take the blame.

Trump and the Iranian delegation together is a bad idea. They both are full of hubris, like to make threats, play act for the cameras and always have maximalist demands.

If you have been truly following what has been happening for the pat 40 days and not just talking out of your @$$, you would realize the Iranian delegation is smarter and more strategic than us even with, "the cards they have been dealt with," to paraphrase our urbane President.

The US military has been defeated. It performed worse than Russia. In fact if we had gone head to head with Ukraine, Ukraine would have won the war.

The sad part is that we cannot even quickly pivot. Our entire economic system is built to support large weapons manufacturers which are usless now in comparison to cheap drones. The mythology of our empire is built on saavy, handsome fighter pilots and those large weapons can no longer be updated because of the freeze on essential minerals and parts from China.

We are doomed.

Operationally and tactically the military did not perform badly at all. It was not defeated. It was the lack of even a lick of strategy that sunk us. Trump and Hegseth were defeated

[Anonymous]

Do you think Bibi is listening the negotiations live by hidden device held by the US real estate guys?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Iran did not lay mines. The strait was closed by insurance premiums risk. 10-15 ships a day use the strait.

This.

It’s actually pretty easy to monitor the traffic live on Marinetraffic.com

Reports say Iran did haphazardly deploy mines in the strait during the early days of the war, and is now struggling to find and remove them.

Seriously no credible reports say this. Seems like you are pushing propaganda. 150-200 ships have passed through the strait since the “war” started. Why haven’t they hit any mines? It’s a very narrow shipping channel.

Just stop.

DP. Someone is certainly pushing propaganda here and that someone is YOU. Why are you lying and trying to discredit reputable sources?

A normal person questions antiquated media outlets at this point because in reality, they were given credibility based on no one challenging their BS. They have no where near the credibility they deserve. We now know how much propaganda they spread on behalf of snakes. That's why we got the God damned Iraq war, because there were no REAL journalists around back then to question the blatant lies. The "journalists" back then were busy shopping for desert wear. And we had lying trash like Judith Miller pushing propaganda. Not much has changed since those days.

I'm watching propagandists question real, investigative journalists like Ryan Grim/Jeremy Scahill at DropSite News. Meanwhile, they regularly scoop outlets like the NYT by WEEKS. For years, pp attacked Al Jazeera, meanwhile, American outlets were stealing their feed during the Iraq war and their scoops, and never giving them credit back then.

American media has no credibility at this point. Their coverage of a genocide has been downright evil. That's why I couldn't care less about links to the IOF Times, Bezos' trash rag, Bari Weiss' garbage or ZNN. Those outlets are for meemaws and peepaws who still think Rachel "the Gulf states benefit from the Iran War" Maddow has credibility.

Annnnd, she's back to continue poisoning thread after thread. Your posts are comical - it's clear we're reading the ravings of a very disturbed individual who has personal reasons for trying to discredit Pulitzer-prize winning news organizations in favor of the social media slop you consume voraciously. But what's funniest of all is YOU calling those of us using credible, respected sources, "propagandists" while YOU continue to serve up your garbage and insist it's believable. I also love your constant digs at Jewish journalists. Don't forget your hatred of Josh Tapper and Dana Bash!

[Anonymous]

*Jake Tapper