Reply to War with Iran Part II

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "War with Iran Part II"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Iran did not lay mines. The strait was closed by insurance premiums risk. 10-15 ships a day use the strait. [/quote]

This.

It’s actually pretty easy to monitor the traffic live on Marinetraffic.com
[/quote]

Reports say Iran did haphazardly deploy mines in the strait during the early days of the war, and is now struggling to find and remove them.

[twitter]https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2042760094429962681[/twitter][/quote]

Seriously no credible reports say this. Seems like you are pushing propaganda. 150-200 ships have passed through the strait since the “war” started. Why haven’t they hit any mines? It’s a very narrow shipping channel.

Just stop. 
[/quote]

DP.  Someone is certainly pushing propaganda here and that someone is YOU.  Why are you lying and trying to discredit reputable sources?  [/quote]

A normal person questions antiquated media outlets at this point because in reality, they were given credibility based on no one challenging their BS.   They have no where near the credibility they deserve. We now know how much propaganda they spread on behalf of snakes. That's why we got the God damned Iraq war, because there were no REAL journalists around back then to question the blatant lies. The "journalists" back then were busy shopping for desert wear. And we had lying trash like Judith Miller pushing propaganda. Not much has changed since those days.

I'm watching propagandists question real, investigative journalists like Ryan Grim/Jeremy Scahill at DropSite News. Meanwhile, they regularly scoop outlets like  the NYT by WEEKS.  For years, pp attacked Al Jazeera, meanwhile, American outlets were stealing their feed during the Iraq war and their scoops, and never giving them credit back then.

American media has no credibility at this point. Their coverage of a genocide has been downright evil. That's why I couldn't care less about links to the IOF Times, Bezos' trash rag, Bari Weiss' garbage or ZNN. Those outlets are for meemaws and peepaws who still think Rachel "the Gulf states benefit from the Iran War" Maddow has credibility. [/quote]

Annnnd, she's back to continue poisoning thread after thread.  Your posts are comical - it's clear we're reading the ravings of a very disturbed individual who has personal reasons for trying to discredit Pulitzer-prize winning news organizations in favor of the social media slop you consume voraciously.  But what's funniest of all is YOU calling those of us using credible, respected sources, "propagandists" while YOU continue to serve up your garbage and insist it's believable.  I also love your constant digs at Jewish journalists.  Don't forget your hatred of Josh Tapper and Dana Bash!   :lol: [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics