Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

[Anonymous]

Biden needs to sue the banks since the records are falsified. And we need the dems on that committee who were also in the skiff to speak up on Biden’s behalf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Fox is reporting this is a nothing burger.

The second one does. And apparently there are two more

[Anonymous]

And you know this because Fox told you? Or you are privy to the information yourself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Fox is reporting this is a nothing burger.

The second one does. And apparently there are two more

(Hearsay+Innuendo) x 2 = 0 Evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Oh honey. You poor thing. Trump has actually been indicted.

What does that have to do with the documents in the skiff?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Seems like she admitted to breaking the law. Does not matter is it was not classified.

She read the document in the Skiff and took notes. Then she gave those notes to be kept inside the skiff. When she left the skiff. she wrote down what she had read which is perfectly legal, since the document wasn’t classified to begin with.

[Anonymous]

skiff lol
That’s what I use to move stuff around

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Seems like she admitted to breaking the law. Does not matter is it was not classified.

She read the document in the Skiff and took notes. Then she gave those notes to be kept inside the skiff. When she left the skiff. she wrote down what she had read which is perfectly legal, since the document wasn’t classified to begin with.

She took the notes on her phone and sold those note.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Fox is reporting this is a nothing burger.

The second one does. And apparently there are two more

(Hearsay+Innuendo) x 2 = 0 Evidence.

Was stated by congress people who were in the skiff and saw the information

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:skiff lol
That’s what I use to move stuff around

No matter how you spell it, it doesn’t make documents less true. Again, Biden should sue the banks for falsifying records.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Seems like she admitted to breaking the law. Does not matter is it was not classified.

She read the document in the Skiff and took notes. Then she gave those notes to be kept inside the skiff. When she left the skiff. she wrote down what she had read which is perfectly legal, since the document wasn’t classified to begin with.

She took the notes on her phone and sold those note.

After leaving the SKIF, where the committee was forced to view non classified info

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Seems like she admitted to breaking the law. Does not matter is it was not classified.

She read the document in the Skiff and took notes. Then she gave those notes to be kept inside the skiff. When she left the skiff. she wrote down what she had read which is perfectly legal, since the document wasn’t classified to begin with.

She took the notes on her phone and sold those note.

Please link to the selling of notes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Seems like she admitted to breaking the law. Does not matter is it was not classified.

She read the document in the Skiff and took notes. Then she gave those notes to be kept inside the skiff. When she left the skiff. she wrote down what she had read which is perfectly legal, since the document wasn’t classified to begin with.

The bolded is illegal. And then reciting those notes before the press is a second potential count.

Thanks for playing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Seems like she admitted to breaking the law. Does not matter is it was not classified.

She read the document in the Skiff and took notes. Then she gave those notes to be kept inside the skiff. When she left the skiff. she wrote down what she had read which is perfectly legal, since the document wasn’t classified to begin with.

The bolded is illegal. And then reciting those notes before the press is a second potential count.

Thanks for playing.

No it’s not illegal. They can take notes in the SKIF so long as they turn in those notes inside the SKIF for safe keeping. Which she did. Thanks for playing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The information was not classified. She stated that in her initial statement to the public. Face it. Biden is guilty in this case

Seems like she admitted to breaking the law. Does not matter is it was not classified.

She read the document in the Skiff and took notes. Then she gave those notes to be kept inside the skiff. When she left the skiff. she wrote down what she had read which is perfectly legal, since the document wasn’t classified to begin with.

The bolded is illegal. And then reciting those notes before the press is a second potential count.

Thanks for playing.

No it’s not illegal. They can take notes in the SKIF so long as they turn in those notes inside the SKIF for safe keeping. Which she did. Thanks for playing!

Oh, and you can most certainly talk to the press about an unclassified document.