Controversial opinion: College and University edition
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| The bottom quartile of admitted test scores/grades at elite LACs are comprised mostly of athletes, legacies and URMs. |
Anonymous
| Spending $300K on an undergraduate education is utter buffoonery. |
Anonymous
Go back to your homework 
|
Anonymous
| 50% of all posters on this forum are dopey. |
Anonymous
How is that controversial? |
Anonymous
| Have a citation? |
Anonymous
Agreed. Who else would be down there? VIPs, maybe? |
Anonymous
| Genes, personality and upbringing are a better indicator of success than the University one attends. |
Anonymous
| Uva is full of douchebags |
Anonymous
| One's college room-mate can make all the difference. DC got a real dud and is depressed and hating school. |
Anonymous
| UDC is better than most think and can be a good (and cheap) choice. |
Anonymous
The top 50% would be Asian if elite US colleges weren't racist. If they admitted on pure merit, liberal whites who scoff at the lack of merit of legacies and athletes would immediately start whining that "it's not all about merit, HYP doesn't just want boring grade-grubbers, HYP should admit muh well-rounded child!" |
Anonymous
| What is UDC? |
Anonymous
| A lot of, if no most, Division 1 athletes, with designs on going pro, don't belong on a university campus. |
Anonymous
| ^ not |