Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this stuff works but can someone explain how the BRF can just deny support for Harry's child when they're literally protecting williams kids?

"Do what we want and how we want it or you are on your own."

Not really true.

There’s no precedent for giving a prince title to Archie, or separate security. He’s a great-grandchild. The Queen would have to issue a separate letters patent, which Parliament would then have to approve.

People act like Williams’ and Harry’s kids are on equal footing. They are not and never will be.

Got it thanks. Meghan made it seem like her son was stripped of the title. Said something along the lines of why should my son not have what he is entitled to have...That's why I was confused.

Yea she got some important things wrong about how the royal family operates. My guess is she never cared to learn. I’m predicting the Royals either completely ignore her and her antics or just start slowly releasing embarrassing tidbits about her to the British press.

So I still don't get why they would leak all that stuff about her to the press. What was their point and objective for doing that?? Was it jealousy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this stuff works but can someone explain how the BRF can just deny support for Harry's child when they're literally protecting williams kids?

"Do what we want and how we want it or you are on your own."

Not really true.

There’s no precedent for giving a prince title to Archie, or separate security. He’s a great-grandchild. The Queen would have to issue a separate letters patent, which Parliament would then have to approve.

People act like Williams’ and Harry’s kids are on equal footing. They are not and never will be.

This. And I'm not surprised Megan was not on board with this. She's not the second fiddle type.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Americans love grifters apparently. First Trump now Markle.
SAD!

Americans support non-racists. And PM Johnson needs to think carefully about what he's going to say this afternoon. Thanks to him Britain needs that post-Brexit/I'm-so-racist-I'm-leaving-the-EU-over-migrants deal more than we need anything from them.

And Jen Psaki, the Biden Press Secretary just spoke up in support from the WHITE HOUSE PRESS ROOM.

Take that you British racists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this stuff works but can someone explain how the BRF can just deny support for Harry's child when they're literally protecting williams kids?

"Do what we want and how we want it or you are on your own."

Not really true.

There’s no precedent for giving a prince title to Archie, or separate security. He’s a great-grandchild. The Queen would have to issue a separate letters patent, which Parliament would then have to approve.

People act like Williams’ and Harry’s kids are on equal footing. They are not and never will be.

This. And I'm not surprised Megan was not on board with this. She's not the second fiddle type.

Nailed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No they signed a 100m deal with netflix to develop docu series, films, childrens series. They also got paid 7m for last nights interview and are getting 1m for appearances. Podcasts are probably a hobby.

You are a bald faced liar!

OPRAH got $7 million for the interview, the Sussexes got NOTHING. They haven’t done any paid public appearances since the ONE appearance in Florida before the pandemic.

You ugly, ugly women are so full of hate. I pity your husbands and children, truly.

The term is bold you psycho chick...

No it is not, ignoramus.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/is-that-lie-bald-faced-or-bold-faced-or-barefaced

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not surprised by the level of vitriol in the comments sections of the UK tabloids articles, but it’s a bit shocking to see the hatemongering against Meghan here on an overwhelmingly American forum. What is it, if not reaction to her being an ‘uppity’ woman of color?

I’d love to know how many of you reviling her are MAGA voters.

Not a MAGA and could literally not care less about her race. It’s interesting and infuriating that we can’t not like someone without being accused of it having something to do with her race. You know you don’t have to like people just because of their race right? I can not like her personality.

I’m as liberal as you can get and hate her because she is better off than 99.999% of people in this world and instead of ignoring the tabloids like the Middleton one does, she spends her fame on whining about her situation. Half a million are dead from Covid in this country, kids haven’t been in school for a year, there is a climate crisis going on, more people than ever are hungry and homeless in this country- and you go on Oprah and talk about how some tabloids made you cry? So you moved to Hollywood for privacy? JFC, what an out of touch fool she is. Who gives a shit about what some crusty old Brit told her about her baby? If you’re going to bring down that toxic family, at least bring up Prince Andrew. She doesn’t care about anyone but herself though.

Yes! Extremely unlikeable.

Honestly this was my take as well. (I’m progressive as well so...). But the whole thing reeked of privilege. While I completely get that living under the thumb of the Royal Family would be stifling, I also couldn’t help thinking how damn privileged they are and whining publicly about all of these slights was pretty tone deaf. Here we have so much suffering in the world, people really struggling day in & day out, and Meghan Markle wants people to feel sorry for HER! Sigh.

I know most of us wish we had those problems lol....oh and I'm a conservative liberal is anyone needs to know. Yes it's rough having to go to those orphanages, parades, children hospitals, and have a royal title. They were treated very well, but their roles are hierarchical.

My Dh is a minority and they've talked about light and dark family members, not in a bad way or racist. I don't believe that ever happened, but if it did seriously so what. She's going to take it out on the entire family? What a sociopath.

ou
When your DH's talk about it, do they preface the question with "how is that going to make you feel? how do you deal with it if the child is dark?" If they do, your family is also colorist and please with this BS that my DH or DW is a minority. Racism and colorism reeks in the Asian, Hispanic and Caribbean communities. You don't get a pass because your DH is also a colorist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An English clergyman said they couldn’t possibly have been married 3 days early. No second witness and not an approved location so it wouldn’t have been valid.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9337999/Church-vicar-says-Meghans-claim-Harry-secretly-tied-knot-earlier-easily-verified.html

she said that was when the made their own vows and that that ceremony was for them not everybody else. the point was not which one was official.

She said they were married 3 days earlier. They were not.

you are splitting hairs. the small quiet ceremony was the one that was special for them. this is not uncommon.

[Anonymous]

I truly think the best thing the royal family can do is ignore the interview and anything else that comes from those two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this stuff works but can someone explain how the BRF can just deny support for Harry's child when they're literally protecting williams kids?

"Do what we want and how we want it or you are on your own."

+1 you are either in or you are out. They wanted to step out halfway. Not possible. As Harry admitted in the interview m, there was a change of their status.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know how this stuff works but can someone explain how the BRF can just deny support for Harry's child when they're literally protecting williams kids?

"Do what we want and how we want it or you are on your own."

Not really true.

There’s no precedent for giving a prince title to Archie, or separate security. He’s a great-grandchild. The Queen would have to issue a separate letters patent, which Parliament would then have to approve.

People act like Williams’ and Harry’s kids are on equal footing. They are not and never will be.

Got it thanks. Meghan made it seem like her son was stripped of the title. Said something along the lines of why should my son not have what he is entitled to have...That's why I was confused.

That's not quite it. William's kids already have it because they are children of the heir. Since the time of Elizabeth's father, Archie would get it when his grandfather became king. Right now the monarch is his great grandmother. The BRF was considering changing that tradition so that grandchildren on the reigning monarch NOT get the title. Meghan was pointing out that they were making that change just when Archie and his sister were going to be the ones to benefit. It troubled her that they would change the tradition just when the first person of color would stand to benefit. It troubled her far more that ongoing security for Archie and his sister was tied to that title. So it wasn't just a title. It was a title and security.

[Anonymous]

Some people who don’t like Meghan are racist. Some aren’t.
The way the discussion about Archie’s color is being presented, it’s racist. Trying to dispute that looks racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is very telling how deep racism is in America by posts here on dcum! You just don't get it! You are so blind to your own bias when it comes to race and race issues.

You truly think all your comments about Meghan are just that, not clouded by decades of being conditioned to view women, particularly Black women, as hysterical, irrational, and playing the victim.
I am saying this with all honesty and well intentions; please, please look into what racial bias is and how you are unaware of it. Once you start realizing what it is and how it manifests, I am hopeful that many here will realize that they truly didn't know they were engaged in it.
Because you were conditioned to think you are just telling it like it is.

But, racial power structures are so ingrained in the culture that you truly believe you are not saying or acting in a racist way, even when you are.
Even BBC is acknowledging that this must be addressed, but not the majority of white dcum.

My black friends think she is entitled and spoiled. I don’t think you are reading the room correctly.

Oprah was not buying it either. Frankly, she fit the part of an “entitled Karen” more.

I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU. They did not have this conversation with you. Lies, lies, and more lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone find the whole story about therapy really, really weird? It's well known (at least here in the UK), that Charles pushed Diana to go to therapy, that William and Harry went to therapy after their mother passed (they've both spoken publicly about this), that Kate went to therapy with her brother when he was very depressed. Meghan said that she told everyone and no one was willing to help. Harry then said he told no one, not even his family. She couldn't have called up her OBGYN to ask for a referral? A private doctor? Harry's therapist? It makes no sense to me.

+11111111111111111111111111

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oprah just helped them launch the brand. Pretty sure she is all in.

Don't forget that Oprah attended their wedding when they barely knew each other. She has since socialized with Meghan's mother. She was not an impartial interviewer.

THis was to help them and their future endeavours. I don't see that it pretended to be anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I truly think the best thing the royal family can do is ignore the interview and anything else that comes from those two.

sure but the interview was not for them.