Girls ID Season 26/27 Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

Unfortunately, you have to rely on GotSport which is highly inaccurate (for example Arlington 2013 RL is ranked higher than Arlington 2014 NL) or Soccer Rankings which does give points for both tournaments outside of conference and regular league/conference games.

If you look at the actual rankings app, it will say FVU 2012 #1 . Thanks Arlington Dad, we do not do gotsport rankings here.

Ranked #1 relying on one player kick and run style. That won’t cut it next season. And then MV made a blunder when adding to the 2026/27 roster. You are up for a nice surprise. You don’t believe it, just wait until next fall games. Remember this post lol.

As opposed to the Arlington plan being give it to one player and let her and dad do whatever they want?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

Unfortunately, you have to rely on GotSport which is highly inaccurate (for example Arlington 2013 RL is ranked higher than Arlington 2014 NL) or Soccer Rankings which does give points for both tournaments outside of conference and regular league/conference games.

If you look at the actual rankings app, it will say FVU 2012 #1 . Thanks Arlington Dad, we do not do gotsport rankings here.

Ranked #1 relying on one player kick and run style. That won’t cut it next season. And then MV made a blunder when adding to the 2026/27 roster. You are up for a nice surprise. You don’t believe it, just wait until next fall games. Remember this post lol.

Your team is no different. Same kick and run.

[Anonymous]

How will the rankings app account for the BY/SY switch next season. It should wipe the slate clean and start from scratch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

Unfortunately, you have to rely on GotSport which is highly inaccurate (for example Arlington 2013 RL is ranked higher than Arlington 2014 NL) or Soccer Rankings which does give points for both tournaments outside of conference and regular league/conference games.

If you look at the actual rankings app, it will say FVU 2012 #1 . Thanks Arlington Dad, we do not do gotsport rankings here.

Ranked #1 relying on one player kick and run style. That won’t cut it next season. And then MV made a blunder when adding to the 2026/27 roster. You are up for a nice surprise. You don’t believe it, just wait until next fall games. Remember this post lol.

You have to qualify anything that goes against your narrative?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

So over “the MA is weak”, “DMV players aren’t good”, “DMV coaches are washed”, “DMV doesn’t have P4 recruits”.

CSA, VDA, RU are all ranked in the top 25 ECNL clubs. NC Courage normally is too but had a bad year last year. That’s 3/10 NA teams in the top 25 clubs.

Use your google.

Agree. MA is a strong conference and the teams consistently hold their own against teams at ECNL showcases like Florida, Kansas City and Dallas. If MA were a weak conference the teams would be blown out at showcases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
As opposed to the Arlington plan being give it to one player and let her and dad do whatever they want?

What year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

Same three clubs according to Soccer Rankings

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 2
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 3
2008/07: 4

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 1
2011: 4
2010: 4
2009: 5
2008/07: 6

VDA
2013: 5
2012: 6
2011: 2
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

So over “the MA is weak”, “DMV players aren’t good”, “DMV coaches are washed”, “DMV doesn’t have P4 recruits”.

CSA, VDA, RU are all ranked in the top 25 ECNL clubs. NC Courage normally is too but had a bad year last year. That’s 3/10 NA teams in the top 25 clubs.

Use your google.

Agree. MA is a strong conference and the teams consistently hold their own against teams at ECNL showcases like Florida, Kansas City and Dallas. If MA were a weak conference the teams would be blown out at showcases.

NA is stronger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

So over “the MA is weak”, “DMV players aren’t good”, “DMV coaches are washed”, “DMV doesn’t have P4 recruits”.

CSA, VDA, RU are all ranked in the top 25 ECNL clubs. NC Courage normally is too but had a bad year last year. That’s 3/10 NA teams in the top 25 clubs.

Use your google.

Agree. MA is a strong conference and the teams consistently hold their own against teams at ECNL showcases like Florida, Kansas City and Dallas. If MA were a weak conference the teams would be blown out at showcases.

There are only 10 ECNL divisions. Each division would expect to have 2.5 teams make the Top 25. So, having 3 teams is about average. It's not weak, but it is almost the definition of Average.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How will the rankings app account for the BY/SY switch next season. It should wipe the slate clean and start from scratch.

Valid question, but I don't think the rankings apps will start over with a clean sheet at all. It should just continue on as it does and incorporate results into the rolling data window.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
As opposed to the Arlington plan being give it to one player and let her and dad do whatever they want?

What year?

Everyone knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

So over “the MA is weak”, “DMV players aren’t good”, “DMV coaches are washed”, “DMV doesn’t have P4 recruits”.

CSA, VDA, RU are all ranked in the top 25 ECNL clubs. NC Courage normally is too but had a bad year last year. That’s 3/10 NA teams in the top 25 clubs.

Use your google.

Agree. MA is a strong conference and the teams consistently hold their own against teams at ECNL showcases like Florida, Kansas City and Dallas. If MA were a weak conference the teams would be blown out at showcases.

There are only 10 ECNL divisions. Each division would expect to have 2.5 teams make the Top 25. So, having 3 teams is about average. It's not weak, but it is almost the definition of Average.

Not an even distribution though. It’s average at worst. Southeast, for example. 16 teams. One in the top 25. Concorde fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only posting the girls because this is a girls thread

ECNL Mid-Atlantic conference standings only (since people argue about the accuracy of Soccer Rankings and GotSport)

Arlington
2013: 3
2012: 1
2011: 1
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008/07: 7

FVU
2013: 1
2012: 3
2011: 6
2010: 6
2009: 8
2008/07: 5

VDA
2013: 6
2012: 4
2011: 5
2010: 1
2009: 1
2008/07: 2


https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx

In a super weak conference. How did these teams do outside of the conference?

So over “the MA is weak”, “DMV players aren’t good”, “DMV coaches are washed”, “DMV doesn’t have P4 recruits”.

CSA, VDA, RU are all ranked in the top 25 ECNL clubs. NC Courage normally is too but had a bad year last year. That’s 3/10 NA teams in the top 25 clubs.

Use your google.

Agree. MA is a strong conference and the teams consistently hold their own against teams at ECNL showcases like Florida, Kansas City and Dallas. If MA were a weak conference the teams would be blown out at showcases.

NA is stronger.

It might be, Bethesda dad. 2/10 in top 25.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will the rankings app account for the BY/SY switch next season. It should wipe the slate clean and start from scratch.

Valid question, but I don't think the rankings apps will start over with a clean sheet at all. It should just continue on as it does and incorporate results into the rolling data window.

This would be akin to college sports like football or basketball not starting over after a season ends. Doesn’t make much sense. Each league year should be an entirely new slate. Why would data from this season influence next seasons data when most teams are completely different. Close to 50% turnover on average with the switch to SY

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will the rankings app account for the BY/SY switch next season. It should wipe the slate clean and start from scratch.

Valid question, but I don't think the rankings apps will start over with a clean sheet at all. It should just continue on as it does and incorporate results into the rolling data window.

This would be akin to college sports like football or basketball not starting over after a season ends. Doesn’t make much sense. Each league year should be an entirely new slate. Why would data from this season influence next seasons data when most teams are completely different. Close to 50% turnover on average with the switch to SY

This. Someone call the rankings app guy and make this happen.