The Twitter Files

[Anonymous]

Shellenberger is calling for q bipartisan Church Committee-type investigation into the “U.S. Security State.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

For the love of all that is holy do you take Elon and his handpicked “journalists” at their word on anything and everything? That $3.5m was reimbursement for hours Twitter staff spent researching and responding investigatory requests from the FBI that had a court order. And newsflash - any corporation who gets this type of request from the FBI can be reimbursed for the time spent on it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

For the love of all that is holy do you take Elon and his handpicked “journalists” at their word on anything and everything? That $3.5m was reimbursement for hours Twitter staff spent researching and responding investigatory requests from the FBI that had a court order. And newsflash - any corporation who gets this type of request from the FBI can be reimbursed for the time spent on it

18 USC § 2607.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

For the love of all that is holy do you take Elon and his handpicked “journalists” at their word on anything and everything? That $3.5m was reimbursement for hours Twitter staff spent researching and responding investigatory requests from the FBI that had a court order. And newsflash - any corporation who gets this type of request from the FBI can be reimbursed for the time spent on it

Lays it all out succinctly.

https://www.techdirt.com/2022/12/20/no-the-fbi-is-not-paying-twitter-to-censor/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

For the love of all that is holy do you take Elon and his handpicked “journalists” at their word on anything and everything? That $3.5m was reimbursement for hours Twitter staff spent researching and responding investigatory requests from the FBI that had a court order. And newsflash - any corporation who gets this type of request from the FBI can be reimbursed for the time spent on it

Lays it all out succinctly.

https://www.techdirt.com/2022/12/20/no-the-fbi-is-not-paying-twitter-to-censor/

"Twitter Files" releases are distortions upon distortions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

For the love of all that is holy do you take Elon and his handpicked “journalists” at their word on anything and everything? That $3.5m was reimbursement for hours Twitter staff spent researching and responding investigatory requests from the FBI that had a court order. And newsflash - any corporation who gets this type of request from the FBI can be reimbursed for the time spent on it

18 USC § 2607.

Was Twitter closing on a property with a federally regulated mortgage at the time? 😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

For the love of all that is holy do you take Elon and his handpicked “journalists” at their word on anything and everything? That $3.5m was reimbursement for hours Twitter staff spent researching and responding investigatory requests from the FBI that had a court order. And newsflash - any corporation who gets this type of request from the FBI can be reimbursed for the time spent on it

18 USC § 2607.

Was Twitter closing on a property with a federally regulated mortgage at the time? 😆

That’s 12 USC 2607. 18 USC 2607 say something entirely different, at least it will if it’s ever used.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI shouldn’t be in the business of engaging in every crank conspiracy theory. The nutjobs aren’t going to be convinced by a denial in any event.

Oh, but they did respond. And, the response was full of manure.

"The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities."

This was not an effort to identify "foreign" or "criminal" entities.
These were accounts from US citizens who have not been charged with any crime - because no crime has been committed.

The FBI is out of bounds. But, Twitter did get a pay out of $3.5 million for their cooperation.

For the love of all that is holy do you take Elon and his handpicked “journalists” at their word on anything and everything? That $3.5m was reimbursement for hours Twitter staff spent researching and responding investigatory requests from the FBI that had a court order. And newsflash - any corporation who gets this type of request from the FBI can be reimbursed for the time spent on it

18 USC § 2607.

Was Twitter closing on a property with a federally regulated mortgage at the time? 😆

That’s 12 USC 2607. 18 USC 2607 say something entirely different, at least it will if it’s ever used.

18 USC 2607 doesn’t exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FBI had Hunter's laptop since 2019. They then ran an exercise with social media about how they would respond to hacked material about Hunter appearing close to the election.

They were prepping the social media companies to censor the laptop for them.

There is nothing in the multiple laptops that can be used by any law enforcement or in any court of law. The multiple laptops are useless. There is just too much evidence that points to all the laptops being fakes. I wonder how many laws Giuliani and the laptop repair shop guy - John Paul Mac Isaac. He has a new “book” coming out. Guess he admits to stealing the laptops?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI had Hunter's laptop since 2019. They then ran an exercise with social media about how they would respond to hacked material about Hunter appearing close to the election.

They were prepping the social media companies to censor the laptop for them.

There is nothing in the multiple laptops that can be used by any law enforcement or in any court of law. The multiple laptops are useless. There is just too much evidence that points to all the laptops being fakes. I wonder how many laws Giuliani and the laptop repair shop guy - John Paul Mac Isaac. He has a new “book” coming out. Guess he admits to stealing the laptops?

How is there "multiple laptops?" The receipt was for ONE laptop.

[Anonymous]

Donald Trump’s latest screed on Truth (sic) Social. This man is deranged:

The FBI used Twitter and Facebook to bludgeon the 2020 Election to Biden. Nothing Negative could be said about him, especially as it related to Hunter’s Laptop From Hell, and ONLY Negative could be said about me. They were illegally after “Trump” at a level of ferocity, hate and yes, desperation, that has never been seen in our Country before. Other Media companies were involved also. The change in the Election was Complete & Total, with Millions of votes switched, at least 17%. TRUMP WON, BIG!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI had Hunter's laptop since 2019. They then ran an exercise with social media about how they would respond to hacked material about Hunter appearing close to the election.

They were prepping the social media companies to censor the laptop for them.

There is nothing in the multiple laptops that can be used by any law enforcement or in any court of law. The multiple laptops are useless. There is just too much evidence that points to all the laptops being fakes. I wonder how many laws Giuliani and the laptop repair shop guy - John Paul Mac Isaac. He has a new “book” coming out. Guess he admits to stealing the laptops?

How is there "multiple laptops?" The receipt was for ONE laptop.

Please stop embarrassing yourself if you’re not going to bother to read the multiple posts explaining this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FBI had Hunter's laptop since 2019. They then ran an exercise with social media about how they would respond to hacked material about Hunter appearing close to the election.

They were prepping the social media companies to censor the laptop for them.

There is nothing in the multiple laptops that can be used by any law enforcement or in any court of law. The multiple laptops are useless. There is just too much evidence that points to all the laptops being fakes. I wonder how many laws Giuliani and the laptop repair shop guy - John Paul Mac Isaac. He has a new “book” coming out. Guess he admits to stealing the laptops?

How is there "multiple laptops?" The receipt was for ONE laptop.

Please stop embarrassing yourself if you’re not going to bother to read the multiple posts explaining this.

There was one laptop. Multiple copies of its drive were made. But a huge problem is that the contents of the various drives are different, and the ones that had forensics done on them show files were altered and added to the drive long after Hunter had it.

[Anonymous]

There was only ever a credible paper trail to Biden for one laptop. Anyone's guess what the story with the other two supposed laptops is.