The Twitter Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hard to believe that the IRS "investigation" isn't political in nature.

[Anonymous]

I guess laying off 90% of the twitter workforce didn't work out so well.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

This is just ludicrous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is just ludicrous.

Vivek Ramaswamy is a complete idiot on both of those two topics - climate policy and China policy - but I don't think he's censorworthy. Let him go ahead and make a fool of himself.

[Anonymous]

<sad trombone sound>

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is just ludicrous.

LinkedIn isn’t a political bullshit message board. It doesn’t want that stupid shit and it doesn’t have to host it.

[Anonymous]

Once again, all those people on the right believed the lies. This particular thread is 82 pages long...at least 41 of it is misinformed people defending Musk and Trump...

[Anonymous]

Elon and Matt are such warriors for free speech

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

New video undercuts claim Twitter censored pro-Trump views before Jan. 6

“Some participants in the call pushed the company to adopt a tougher position, arguing that moderators should be able to remove what they called “coded incitements to violence” — messages, such as “locked and loaded,” that could be read as threats. But a senior manager dismissed the idea, saying executives wanted them to take action against only the most flagrant rules violations, adding, “We didn’t want to go too far.”

“What if there’s violence on the ground?” responded another team member in Twitter’s Dublin office. “Would we take action … or do we have to wait for violence — someone getting shot?”
The next day, a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol, leaving five people dead and more than 100 police officers injured.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
New video undercuts claim Twitter censored pro-Trump views before Jan. 6

“Some participants in the call pushed the company to adopt a tougher position, arguing that moderators should be able to remove what they called “coded incitements to violence” — messages, such as “locked and loaded,” that could be read as threats. But a senior manager dismissed the idea, saying executives wanted them to take action against only the most flagrant rules violations, adding, “We didn’t want to go too far.”

“What if there’s violence on the ground?” responded another team member in Twitter’s Dublin office. “Would we take action … or do we have to wait for violence — someone getting shot?”
The next day, a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol, leaving five people dead and more than 100 police officers injured.”

Holy shit.

This just makes me all the more angry about the "ohh poor oppressed Trumpsters abused by Twitter" narrative Musk and Taibbi tried peddling.

[Anonymous]

LMAO

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LMAO

It’s becoming more and more unusable. I was still using it after Elon took over because I like to read tweets from some smart folks still on there. But it’s just a buggy mess lately so I’ve basically stopped.