IVF embryos are people too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans:

"Have babies! No abortion or birth control for you! If you're infertile then fk you!"

It is a legitimate concern for people who care about climate and planet over population. You can go ahead and have your babies as many as you want (like most newly arrived immigrants do), but there is absolutely no reason to create babies artificially. All the immigrants who came here recently are young and healthy and we will have a healthy next population. 40+ moms can breed the cats.

Except they won't be white babies, so in GOP world, it doesn't count.

Of course it counts. That is why GOP supports all mothers having children. But nice try to play your race card when you have no argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans:

"Have babies! No abortion or birth control for you! If you're infertile then fk you!"

It is a legitimate concern for people who care about climate and planet over population. You can go ahead and have your babies as many as you want (like most newly arrived immigrants do), but there is absolutely no reason to create babies artificially. All the immigrants who came here recently are young and healthy and we will have a healthy next population. 40+ moms can breed the cats.

Lots of IVF procedures are to help infertile males you numbskull

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans:

"Have babies! No abortion or birth control for you! If you're infertile then fk you!"

It is a legitimate concern for people who care about climate and planet over population. You can go ahead and have your babies as many as you want (like most newly arrived immigrants do), but there is absolutely no reason to create babies artificially. All the immigrants who came here recently are young and healthy and we will have a healthy next population. 40+ moms can breed the cats.

Except they won't be white babies, so in GOP world, it doesn't count.

Of course it counts. That is why GOP supports all mothers having children. But nice try to play your race card when you have no argument.

HA HA HA! The GOP supports mothers having children. GTFAH. Where's the universal health care? Where's paid sick and maternity leave? Where is affordable child care? Where's the increase in minimum wages? WHERE? Not in the US, that's for sure!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Southern Baptist Convention has voted to oppose IVF. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/12/ivf-southern-baptist-convention-evangelical-00162994

And Catholics have always been against birth control and abortion. They both mean squat.

No one outside of a religion cares what weird rules they come up with, that is religion is on a slow fade in this country.

The Catholic Church also opposes IVF and IUI. Because it’s not “natural.”

Most Catholics don’t feel that way but think about the composition of the SCOTUS.

That composition was part of a unanimous decision to not limit the abortion medication mifepristone.

Try again pal. That wasn't a decision about mifepristone. It was a decision about the standing of the people who brought the case before the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans:

"Have babies! No abortion or birth control for you! If you're infertile then fk you!"

It is a legitimate concern for people who care about climate and planet over population. You can go ahead and have your babies as many as you want (like most newly arrived immigrants do), but there is absolutely no reason to create babies artificially. All the immigrants who came here recently are young and healthy and we will have a healthy next population. 40+ moms can breed the cats.

My artificially created healthy baby who is now a legal adult paying taxes that will go to your SS says a big FU to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even a patriarchal, conservative place like India has no issues with IVF and abortion is legal up to 20 weeks and under exceptional circumstances up to 24 weeks. I can't even wrap my head around what is happening in the U.S.

It’s like a magic trick where the magician distracts the audience to do the trick.

Here the GOP is distracting the voters with culture wars while they fill their pockets with tax dollars and graft.

It’s both though. The GOP is a terrible alliance of people who are out there to get a buck at any cost along with Christian nationalists who want to install some version of a theocracy with minimal rights for the people they don’t like. That second group is happy to erase IVF.

PP here. You’re correct. The Christian nationalists are dangerous and closely allied with the grifters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans:

"Have babies! No abortion or birth control for you! If you're infertile then fk you!"

It is a legitimate concern for people who care about climate and planet over population. You can go ahead and have your babies as many as you want (like most newly arrived immigrants do), but there is absolutely no reason to create babies artificially. All the immigrants who came here recently are young and healthy and we will have a healthy next population. 40+ moms can breed the cats.

You think only women in their 40s need IVF? I have PCOS and needed IVF to conceive. That waiting room at Shady Grove in Fairfax was full of lots of women in their 20s and 30s when I would arrive for morning monitoring appointments.
Infertility doesn't discriminate based on age, trust me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans:

"Have babies! No abortion or birth control for you! If you're infertile then fk you!"

It is a legitimate concern for people who care about climate and planet over population. You can go ahead and have your babies as many as you want (like most newly arrived immigrants do), but there is absolutely no reason to create babies artificially. All the immigrants who came here recently are young and healthy and we will have a healthy next population. 40+ moms can breed the cats.

You think only women in their 40s need IVF? I have PCOS and needed IVF to conceive. That waiting room at Shady Grove in Fairfax was full of lots of women in their 20s and 30s when I would arrive for morning monitoring appointments.
Infertility doesn't discriminate based on age, trust me.

+1 My sister married at 24 and started trying soon afterwards. She needed a ton of assistance including IVF to have her kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Southern Baptist Convention has voted to oppose IVF. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/12/ivf-southern-baptist-convention-evangelical-00162994

And Catholics have always been against birth control and abortion. They both mean squat.

No one outside of a religion cares what weird rules they come up with, that is religion is on a slow fade in this country.

The Catholic Church also opposes IVF and IUI. Because it’s not “natural.”

Most Catholics don’t feel that way but think about the composition of the SCOTUS.

That composition was part of a unanimous decision to not limit the abortion medication mifepristone.

Try again pal. That wasn't a decision about mifepristone. It was a decision about the standing of the people who brought the case before the court.

And let’s be clear the court didn’t decide in favor of anything that would help women. This was to support the pharmaceutical industry. Had the plaintiff one it would have destroyed that industry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans:

"Have babies! No abortion or birth control for you! If you're infertile then fk you!"

It is a legitimate concern for people who care about climate and planet over population. You can go ahead and have your babies as many as you want (like most newly arrived immigrants do), but there is absolutely no reason to create babies artificially. All the immigrants who came here recently are young and healthy and we will have a healthy next population. 40+ moms can breed the cats.

You think only women in their 40s need IVF? I have PCOS and needed IVF to conceive. That waiting room at Shady Grove in Fairfax was full of lots of women in their 20s and 30s when I would arrive for morning monitoring appointments.
Infertility doesn't discriminate based on age, trust me.

There are lots of affluent couples that do IVF sorry for genetic screening now too. My friend did it to reduce their kids risk of diabetes.

[Anonymous]

Come on ladies. Get with the program
Just let the RWNJ’s F you when you are 19 and easy.
That’s what this is about.
If you would just spread your legs when the men actually desire you, you wouldn’t need IVF.

[Anonymous]

Sorry shouldn’t have added *those men.
Because there’s a type and the SBC full of ‘em.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Come on ladies. Get with the program
Just let the RWNJ’s F you when you are 19 and easy.
That’s what this is about.
If you would just spread your legs when the men actually desire you, you wouldn’t need IVF.

Dummies don't even understand that a significant percentage of IVF is to assist their sorry ass sperm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Southern Baptist Convention has voted to oppose IVF. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/12/ivf-southern-baptist-convention-evangelical-00162994

And Catholics have always been against birth control and abortion. They both mean squat.

No one outside of a religion cares what weird rules they come up with, that is religion is on a slow fade in this country.

The Catholic Church also opposes IVF and IUI. Because it’s not “natural.”

Most Catholics don’t feel that way but think about the composition of the SCOTUS.

That composition was part of a unanimous decision to not limit the abortion medication mifepristone.

Try again pal. That wasn't a decision about mifepristone. It was a decision about the standing of the people who brought the case before the court.

And let’s be clear the court didn’t decide in favor of anything that would help women. This was to support the pharmaceutical industry. Had the plaintiff one it would have destroyed that industry.

In that case IVF should be fine. Industry is worth several billion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on ladies. Get with the program
Just let the RWNJ’s F you when you are 19 and easy.
That’s what this is about.
If you would just spread your legs when the men actually desire you, you wouldn’t need IVF.

Dummies don't even understand that a significant percentage of IVF is to assist their sorry ass sperm.

Yeah, they will find creative ways to make exceptions to their ass-backwards IVF theories if the sorry ass sperm is the cause of the fertility problem.

The true issue lies all those old moms who want to have babies. Screw ‘em. Or don’t. Doesn’t matter. The soon-to-be higher domestic supply of babies should be good enough for everyone.