IVF embryos are people too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are many kids waiting for adoption and in the foster care system.

Not that many, unless you’re fine with a profoundly disabled child. Many people aren’t prepared for that level of responsibility, including the people that give birth to them and the forced birthers that insisted that they be born but refuse to fund any meaningful support for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I thought the GOP wanted to protect IVF?

No, they’re not interested in even discussing that, because IVF embryos are people too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I thought the GOP wanted to protect IVF?

Nope. They want it there for wealthy White heterosexual and married families, but no one else need apply.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

What next

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What next

Fetal personhood

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What next

Fetal personhood

Yes. This is where the GOP is. Fetal personhood. So no abortions for any reason and no IVF procedures. At least it has the virtue of consistency.

[Anonymous]

He is so dumb

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What next

Fetal personhood

Yes. This is where the GOP is. Fetal personhood. So no abortions for any reason and no IVF procedures. At least it has the virtue of consistency.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is so dumb

Omg. Who is actually going to vote for this a$$hat?