No, my tour guide may be wrong. |
So is Pakistan and Afghanistan. |
I have forwarded your post to the Lord Chamberlain of the Household for discussion with King Charles. I am certain he will give it the consideration it so richly deserves. |
I have seen the Guardian News article related to the dispute, your comment is most likely based on that. I also have researched this and the diamond in the royal scepter. I was disappointed at the poor quality of reporting, it didn’t do justice to the history of the diamond or the controversy surrounding the stone. India is not wrong to ask for it back and I agree with them on this I really do not know your level of ignorance, but if you would know your subject matter better you most likely would agree too |
My point is, more than one country wants it. Who decides especially when the country hat has it claims it was a gift? Stop being insulting. |
It was a “gift”. |
Please read some more history It was a war loot, never a gift Before that it was legally owned by India |
The winning side of a war pretty much gets want they want. The winning side gave it to Queen Victoria. |
Even if it was stolen that was eons ago. If we were doing to give back all the things stolen in war there would be no end to it. |
It was taken. |
Then let there be no end to it. |
You first. Give back the land your home sits on. |
It was controversial even during the time of Queen Victoria and Brits questioned it then Why so defensive? What is there so special about stolen goods? Nazi loot has been returned, what about the rest? |
+1. All the land was taken from indigenous people. |
I didn’t colonize anyone. The BRF did. They can start. |