So what kind of King will Charles be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles was hamstrung by tradition. He was supposed to marry a virgin blue blood. He would have married Camilla and lived happily ever after if he had not been the heir. He and Diana were a complete mismatch and made each other miserable. Divorce was inevitable.

Lmao. He did not love Camilla, she was just a convenient and easy f**k. What exactly have you read abou their backstory? Charles was generally unfaithful, he had dozens of girls. Camilla became Chief Mistress because she was convenient. Her house was nearby the Wales house. She was married, so we wouldn't make too many demands of Charles (mistresses mustn't be demanding, they must be soothers of your insecurities). She was plain/not very cute, so she wouldn't outshine Charles. (Many biographers, including Andrew Morton, have noted that Charles actually resented Diana's beauty and hated that she got more cheers and camera flashes than he did.)

And he would've ended the affair many times, if not for Camilla clutching him like a drowning squirrel. The Queen was said to have been angry that Camilla didn't leave Charles alone to repair his marriage.

That he married Camilla in the end has nothing to do with "love", but again soothing his bruised ego. She enabled his narcissism from the start, and he probably resented the public scandal about their affair. So finally he's like, "Well f**k it, I'll need a wife once I'm king, and I'm insecure and lonely, and people already ripped me a new one for having an affair with Camilla. So I'll marry her and then I can give my critics the finger. Hah! We won!"

So romantic. Much roses. Wow.

Pretty much this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

She also thought Charles loved her when she said yes.

She could have divorced him earlier. She chose to stay in a loveless marriage longer than many of her contemporaries. She had her reasons and made her decision, which was her perogative as an adult.

Queen E would not allow it.

She could not prevent it. Diana is not her subject.

Yes, she was

No, she was a British citizen.

[Anonymous]

Queen should've skipped Charles and made William her direct heir.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles was hamstrung by tradition. He was supposed to marry a virgin blue blood. He would have married Camilla and lived happily ever after if he had not been the heir. He and Diana were a complete mismatch and made each other miserable. Divorce was inevitable.

Lmao. He did not love Camilla, she was just a convenient and easy f**k. What exactly have you read abou their backstory? Charles was generally unfaithful, he had dozens of girls. Camilla became Chief Mistress because she was convenient. Her house was nearby the Wales house. She was married, so we wouldn't make too many demands of Charles (mistresses mustn't be demanding, they must be soothers of your insecurities). She was plain/not very cute, so she wouldn't outshine Charles. (Many biographers, including Andrew Morton, have noted that Charles actually resented Diana's beauty and hated that she got more cheers and camera flashes than he did.)

And he would've ended the affair many times, if not for Camilla clutching him like a drowning squirrel. The Queen was said to have been angry that Camilla didn't leave Charles alone to repair his marriage.

That he married Camilla in the end has nothing to do with "love", but again soothing his bruised ego. She enabled his narcissism from the start, and he probably resented the public scandal about their affair. So finally he's like, "Well f**k it, I'll need a wife once I'm king, and I'm insecure and lonely, and people already ripped me a new one for having an affair with Camilla. So I'll marry her and then I can give my critics the finger. Hah! We won!"

So romantic. Much roses. Wow.

Don't know how much of this is true. But also, Camilla earned it by holding her tongue for a couple of decades while the press and country hated her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Queen should've skipped Charles and made William her direct heir.

That’s not how it works but enjoy your fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

She also thought Charles loved her when she said yes.

She could have divorced him earlier. She chose to stay in a loveless marriage longer than many of her contemporaries. She had her reasons and made her decision, which was her perogative as an adult.

Queen E would not allow it.

She could not prevent it. Diana is not her subject.

Yes, she was

No, she was a British citizen.

Who do you think the Queen's subjects were?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

Yes but likely pressured by her family to seize the golden opportunity.

Imagine the advice you would get here as a mother if you wanted wanted to discourage or stop a 19 year old daughter from dating or marrying the wrong guy. You can't stop that train once it's left the station. The mother would be told unequivocally to butt out. Diana made her bed.

If Diana wanted to be Queen, she would have stayed married. The reason I respect her is that she chose to live the life that was right for her, and walked away from the monarchy. Unlike her son and wife, who chose their lives but didn't walk away -- instead choosing to do Netflix specials and sell books trashing their family.

Diana did sell her story and did interviews. Showed Harry how to be strong.

Yep, as did Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

She also thought Charles loved her when she said yes.

She could have divorced him earlier. She chose to stay in a loveless marriage longer than many of her contemporaries. She had her reasons and made her decision, which was her perogative as an adult.

Queen E would not allow it.

She could not prevent it. Diana is not her subject.

Yes, she was

No, she was a British citizen.

And all British citizens are subjects of the Queen/King. Did you just arrive on this planet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Interesting. Were you also groomed by your family as a young teen to marry a rich man, particularly a prince? Also, with the background and family money Diana came from, she had very little formal education. Which old man did your family groom you for, kept you undereducated, and then gave you the opportunity to see through the bullshit and make an informed decision at the age of nineteen? Not even legally old enough to smoke and drink a beer.

[Anonymous]

When do we find out for sure that Charles is adhd/aspergers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

She also thought Charles loved her when she said yes.

She could have divorced him earlier. She chose to stay in a loveless marriage longer than many of her contemporaries. She had her reasons and made her decision, which was her perogative as an adult.

Queen E would not allow it.

She could not prevent it. Diana is not her subject.

Yes, she was

No, she was a British citizen.

And all British citizens are subjects of the Queen/King. Did you just arrive on this planet?

Not in the way monarchs used to be able to exert control but you know this. As a British citizen, she has to the freedom to divorce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When do we find out for sure that Charles is adhd/aspergers?

Not everyone is on the spectrum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When do we find out for sure that Charles is adhd/aspergers?

Not everyone is on the spectrum.

He is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Side Chick Queen is trending now. Camilla is giving hope to all those side chicks that someday just like Camilla they could get their crown.

Charles is an incredibly stupid and impatient king. The Queen knew very well that Camilla leaves a bad taste with many people. Her wish was for Camilla to follow Philips title of Prince Consort with Camilla becoming Princess Consort. Her biggest mistake was giving into Charles pestering. He probably threatened to make her Queen the minute his mother died and she gave in.

By making a big show of dropping the consort from side chick’s title and breaking tradition to include her grandchildren in the coronation he has inadvertently focused attention off himself and stirred up the old controversy.

Cool. There’s hope for Rose!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Interesting. Were you also groomed by your family as a young teen to marry a rich man, particularly a prince? Also, with the background and family money Diana came from, she had very little formal education. Which old man did your family groom you for, kept you undereducated, and then gave you the opportunity to see through the bullshit and make an informed decision at the age of nineteen? Not even legally old enough to smoke and drink a beer.

Huh? 19 year olds could smoke and drink beer. Have sex even. Gasp.

No normal woman would skip the chance to marry the future King of England. Come to your senses.