So what kind of King will Charles be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When do we find out for sure that Charles is adhd/aspergers?

Not everyone is on the spectrum.

He is.

Prove it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Interesting. Were you also groomed by your family as a young teen to marry a rich man, particularly a prince? Also, with the background and family money Diana came from, she had very little formal education. Which old man did your family groom you for, kept you undereducated, and then gave you the opportunity to see through the bullshit and make an informed decision at the age of nineteen? Not even legally old enough to smoke and drink a beer.

"Sit down, my dear. I have something important I want to discuss with you. Here, have a beer. It might help you relax. Your father and I want to be sure you have all the information you need to make an informed decision about your future. You could marry for love -- plan A -- with the understanding that the spark will inevitably die and you will be left with a passionless marriage during which your DH will either try to pursue sex at any and every opportunity while you resent it, or he will resent you for withholding. Either way you can't win -- and it's not your fault the interest in sex will die. How many times can you look forward to having sex with the same man over and over, while thinking about all the chores he refuses to do, all the childcare decisions you are forced to make without any input, all the vacation plans you've had to make over the years with his mother -- yes, you will be dealing directly with HIS mother, for HIM -- and still expect to enjoy it? If you're lucky he won't stray, he'll just sulk. Then again, in some instances you may consider yourself lucky if he does stray. But that's a subject for another night.

Then there's Plan B -- you marry Prince Charles. You start out where you will be in about ten years' time with your "DH for love," only you will be a princess, famous and beloved the world over and eventually the Queen.

You can sleep on the decision. What, made up your mind already? You're marrying Prince Charles? Congratulations, my dear. Despite your lack of "real" education, you are wise beyond your years. Here, let me light that cigarette for you. You are a grown woman, after all."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When do we find out for sure that Charles is adhd/aspergers?

Not everyone is on the spectrum.

He is.

Prove it.

DP. What a dumb standard. I can’t even personally prove Temple Grandin is autistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Interesting. Were you also groomed by your family as a young teen to marry a rich man, particularly a prince? Also, with the background and family money Diana came from, she had very little formal education. Which old man did your family groom you for, kept you undereducated, and then gave you the opportunity to see through the bullshit and make an informed decision at the age of nineteen? Not even legally old enough to smoke and drink a beer.

"Sit down, my dear. I have something important I want to discuss with you. Here, have a beer. It might help you relax. Your father and I want to be sure you have all the information you need to make an informed decision about your future. You could marry for love -- plan A -- with the understanding that the spark will inevitably die and you will be left with a passionless marriage during which your DH will either try to pursue sex at any and every opportunity while you resent it, or he will resent you for withholding. Either way you can't win -- and it's not your fault the interest in sex will die. How many times can you look forward to having sex with the same man over and over, while thinking about all the chores he refuses to do, all the childcare decisions you are forced to make without any input, all the vacation plans you've had to make over the years with his mother -- yes, you will be dealing directly with HIS mother, for HIM -- and still expect to enjoy it? If you're lucky he won't stray, he'll just sulk. Then again, in some instances you may consider yourself lucky if he does stray. But that's a subject for another night.

Then there's Plan B -- you marry Prince Charles. You start out where you will be in about ten years' time with your "DH for love," only you will be a princess, famous and beloved the world over and eventually the Queen.

You can sleep on the decision. What, made up your mind already? You're marrying Prince Charles? Congratulations, my dear. Despite your lack of "real" education, you are wise beyond your years. Here, let me light that cigarette for you. You are a grown woman, after all."

Who is supposed to be saying all this? Diana’s mom that dipped a decade before she came of age?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charles was hamstrung by tradition. He was supposed to marry a virgin blue blood. He would have married Camilla and lived happily ever after if he had not been the heir. He and Diana were a complete mismatch and made each other miserable. Divorce was inevitable.

Lmao. He did not love Camilla, she was just a convenient and easy f**k. What exactly have you read abou their backstory? Charles was generally unfaithful, he had dozens of girls. Camilla became Chief Mistress because she was convenient. Her house was nearby the Wales house. She was married, so we wouldn't make too many demands of Charles (mistresses mustn't be demanding, they must be soothers of your insecurities). She was plain/not very cute, so she wouldn't outshine Charles. (Many biographers, including Andrew Morton, have noted that Charles actually resented Diana's beauty and hated that she got more cheers and camera flashes than he did.)

And he would've ended the affair many times, if not for Camilla clutching him like a drowning squirrel. The Queen was said to have been angry that Camilla didn't leave Charles alone to repair his marriage.

That he married Camilla in the end has nothing to do with "love", but again soothing his bruised ego. She enabled his narcissism from the start, and he probably resented the public scandal about their affair. So finally he's like, "Well f**k it, I'll need a wife once I'm king, and I'm insecure and lonely, and people already ripped me a new one for having an affair with Camilla. So I'll marry her and then I can give my critics the finger. Hah! We won!"

So romantic. Much roses. Wow.

Don't know how much of this is true. But also, Camilla earned it by holding her tongue for a couple of decades while the press and country hated her.

What other option did she have? She has no skills or career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Interesting. Were you also groomed by your family as a young teen to marry a rich man, particularly a prince? Also, with the background and family money Diana came from, she had very little formal education. Which old man did your family groom you for, kept you undereducated, and then gave you the opportunity to see through the bullshit and make an informed decision at the age of nineteen? Not even legally old enough to smoke and drink a beer.

Huh? 19 year olds could smoke and drink beer. Have sex even. Gasp.

No normal woman would skip the chance to marry the future King of England. Come to your senses.

She was 19 and he was an heir, much older and experienced woman has done it for a spare. Joining England's royal family means you are forever special. Do you think Dodi's dad would've been so keen on his son to marry Diana if she was still teaching kids in nursery school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Interesting. Were you also groomed by your family as a young teen to marry a rich man, particularly a prince? Also, with the background and family money Diana came from, she had very little formal education. Which old man did your family groom you for, kept you undereducated, and then gave you the opportunity to see through the bullshit and make an informed decision at the age of nineteen? Not even legally old enough to smoke and drink a beer.

Huh? 19 year olds could smoke and drink beer. Have sex even. Gasp.

No normal woman would skip the chance to marry the future King of England. Come to your senses.

She was 19 and he was an heir, much older and experienced woman has done it for a spare. Joining England's royal family means you are forever special. Do you think Dodi's dad would've been so keen on his son to marry Diana if she was still teaching kids in nursery school.

Maybe? Her dad was still an Earl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who cares if Diana is dead? She was everything a Queen should've been.

Who knows how she'd have blossomed if she hadn't been preyed on, as a 19-year old, by two narcissists in their 30s (Charles and Camilla)?

Seeing that upjumped whore get crowned really rips the veil off the fairytale, I have to say. Not sure why anyone would find this coronation inspiring.

A 19 year old is a grown woman. She was not preyed on. Good grief.

She was groomed at the age of 13 to become Charles's wife. She really didn't have a choice in the matter and had a young, fairy-girl fantasy. It was a different time and you cannot compare a 19-year old of the 1982 with a 2023, 19-year old, more less her idolization of Charles at 13 in the 1970's. Her family did her wrong.

Diana and I are the same age and both introverts. I was able to make decisions about my work, whom I wanted to date and marry without needing my family's approval. You infantilize women with your attitudes. She willingly accepted his proposal and married him. She remained in the marriage long enough to have two sons and divorce him. She was stronger than you give her credit for.

Interesting. Were you also groomed by your family as a young teen to marry a rich man, particularly a prince? Also, with the background and family money Diana came from, she had very little formal education. Which old man did your family groom you for, kept you undereducated, and then gave you the opportunity to see through the bullshit and make an informed decision at the age of nineteen? Not even legally old enough to smoke and drink a beer.

Huh? 19 year olds could smoke and drink beer. Have sex even. Gasp.

No normal woman would skip the chance to marry the future King of England. Come to your senses.

She was 19 and he was an heir, much older and experienced woman has done it for a spare. Joining England's royal family means you are forever special. Do you think Dodi's dad would've been so keen on his son to marry Diana if she was still teaching kids in nursery school.

If Dodi had even noticed her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side Chick Queen is trending now. Camilla is giving hope to all those side chicks that someday just like Camilla they could get their crown.

Charles is an incredibly stupid and impatient king. The Queen knew very well that Camilla leaves a bad taste with many people. Her wish was for Camilla to follow Philips title of Prince Consort with Camilla becoming Princess Consort. Her biggest mistake was giving into Charles pestering. He probably threatened to make her Queen the minute his mother died and she gave in.

By making a big show of dropping the consort from side chick’s title and breaking tradition to include her grandchildren in the coronation he has inadvertently focused attention off himself and stirred up the old controversy.

Cool. There’s hope for Rose!

She's still married to her husband but don't let that get in the way of your fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Side Chick Queen is trending now. Camilla is giving hope to all those side chicks that someday just like Camilla they could get their crown.

Charles is an incredibly stupid and impatient king. The Queen knew very well that Camilla leaves a bad taste with many people. Her wish was for Camilla to follow Philips title of Prince Consort with Camilla becoming Princess Consort. Her biggest mistake was giving into Charles pestering. He probably threatened to make her Queen the minute his mother died and she gave in.

By making a big show of dropping the consort from side chick’s title and breaking tradition to include her grandchildren in the coronation he has inadvertently focused attention off himself and stirred up the old controversy.

Cool. There’s hope for Rose!

She's still married to her husband but don't let that get in the way of your fantasies.

^ William’s fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Wow, I didn't know so many people victim-blamed Diana. Kudos to those of you who stood up for her and recognized that she was groomed and had no idea who she was outside institutional brainwashing.

God, when I was 19 years old I didn't know jack about men or the world. Yeah I could legally vote, and I had a better education than Diana did, but I was completely mentally enslaved by my narcissistic, UMC parents. (Imagine how much more controlling and narcissistic the truly upper-class Spencer family was...not to mention, Diana knew the Queen and the BRF from her little childhood.)

It took me YEARS of therapy, a terrible relationship with a terrible man, and cutting off my abusive mother before I could wake up from the brainwashing. I had education and freedom on my side that Diana didn't have...and the underrated advantage of anonymity, as I'm a happily unknown member of the public. Can you imagine doing this with the eyes of the world on you?

Diana was actually ready to end her engagement once she found put that her beloved fiance was seeing Camilla, but her family guilted her and pressured her into going through with the wedding. She had no one in her corner and no one to confide in, and she had untreated mental health issues. Again, what chance did this poor girl have?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow, I didn't know so many people victim-blamed Diana. Kudos to those of you who stood up for her and recognized that she was groomed and had no idea who she was outside institutional brainwashing.

God, when I was 19 years old I didn't know jack about men or the world. Yeah I could legally vote, and I had a better education than Diana did, but I was completely mentally enslaved by my narcissistic, UMC parents. (Imagine how much more controlling and narcissistic the truly upper-class Spencer family was...not to mention, Diana knew the Queen and the BRF from her little childhood.)

It took me YEARS of therapy, a terrible relationship with a terrible man, and cutting off my abusive mother before I could wake up from the brainwashing. I had education and freedom on my side that Diana didn't have...and the underrated advantage of anonymity, as I'm a happily unknown member of the public. Can you imagine doing this with the eyes of the world on you?

Diana was actually ready to end her engagement once she found put that her beloved fiance was seeing Camilla, but her family guilted her and pressured her into going through with the wedding. She had no one in her corner and no one to confide in, and she had untreated mental health issues. Again, what chance did this poor girl have?

So you think a better scenario for her would have been marrying a run of the mill philanderer, rather than a prince? She got to live the dream. Shocker, it wasn't what it was stacked up to be. Most people live lives of disappointment. She did it as a royal. Bravo to her family if they pusher her into that.

[Anonymous]

I have much more respect for Charles than I ever had for QEII. Thank goodness that woman finally died.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, I didn't know so many people victim-blamed Diana. Kudos to those of you who stood up for her and recognized that she was groomed and had no idea who she was outside institutional brainwashing.

God, when I was 19 years old I didn't know jack about men or the world. Yeah I could legally vote, and I had a better education than Diana did, but I was completely mentally enslaved by my narcissistic, UMC parents. (Imagine how much more controlling and narcissistic the truly upper-class Spencer family was...not to mention, Diana knew the Queen and the BRF from her little childhood.)

It took me YEARS of therapy, a terrible relationship with a terrible man, and cutting off my abusive mother before I could wake up from the brainwashing. I had education and freedom on my side that Diana didn't have...and the underrated advantage of anonymity, as I'm a happily unknown member of the public. Can you imagine doing this with the eyes of the world on you?

Diana was actually ready to end her engagement once she found put that her beloved fiance was seeing Camilla, but her family guilted her and pressured her into going through with the wedding. She had no one in her corner and no one to confide in, and she had untreated mental health issues. Again, what chance did this poor girl have?

So you think a better scenario for her would have been marrying a run of the mill philanderer, rather than a prince? She got to live the dream. Shocker, it wasn't what it was stacked up to be. Most people live lives of disappointment. She did it as a royal. Bravo to her family if they pusher her into that.

Lol. What? Why is your assumption that everyone has to marry a philanderer of some kind? Also she was an aristo you’re acting like she would be marrying a plumber if it weren’t Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, I didn't know so many people victim-blamed Diana. Kudos to those of you who stood up for her and recognized that she was groomed and had no idea who she was outside institutional brainwashing.

God, when I was 19 years old I didn't know jack about men or the world. Yeah I could legally vote, and I had a better education than Diana did, but I was completely mentally enslaved by my narcissistic, UMC parents. (Imagine how much more controlling and narcissistic the truly upper-class Spencer family was...not to mention, Diana knew the Queen and the BRF from her little childhood.)

It took me YEARS of therapy, a terrible relationship with a terrible man, and cutting off my abusive mother before I could wake up from the brainwashing. I had education and freedom on my side that Diana didn't have...and the underrated advantage of anonymity, as I'm a happily unknown member of the public. Can you imagine doing this with the eyes of the world on you?

Diana was actually ready to end her engagement once she found put that her beloved fiance was seeing Camilla, but her family guilted her and pressured her into going through with the wedding. She had no one in her corner and no one to confide in, and she had untreated mental health issues. Again, what chance did this poor girl have?

So you think a better scenario for her would have been marrying a run of the mill philanderer, rather than a prince? She got to live the dream. Shocker, it wasn't what it was stacked up to be. Most people live lives of disappointment. She did it as a royal. Bravo to her family if they pusher her into that.

Lol. What? Why is your assumption that everyone has to marry a philanderer of some kind? Also she was an aristo you’re acting like she would be marrying a plumber if it weren’t Charles.

So as an aristocrat you think marrying the prince of england wasn't the ultimate for her? Of course it was. She didn't have to be pressured into it by her evil family.

BTW, the "brainwashing" the PP describes could also be called "raising a child." That's what parents do, unless they're free-range, which most kids are not.