Dartmouth's reputation - Beware.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

That means half of all Dartmouth families are paying $77K a year out of pocket. No wonder the school is the least diverse socioeconomically within the Ivy League (which is already notorious for skewing towards the wealthy). Source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/college-mobility/dartmouth-college

Dartmouth has 17% of undergraduate receiving Pell Grants. That is higher than the percentage at UVA, VT, W&M, and James Madison.

Dartmouth also has more students from the top 1% of the income spectrum than the bottom 60%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

Pp asked why people write off Dartmouth while UVA is attractive. Price is the answer

The criticisms of Dartmouth were about the environment, not the price. UVA has a similar frat culture, drinking culture, etc. That was the comparison.

But it's entire off campus at UVA and only about 32% participate. You can go all four years without every entering a sorority or frat house. You can also choose not to drink. Amazing!

If by participate you mean go to fraternity parties occasionally or regularly, it’s way more than 32%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

Pp asked why people write off Dartmouth while UVA is attractive. Price is the answer

The criticisms of Dartmouth were about the environment, not the price. UVA has a similar frat culture, drinking culture, etc. That was the comparison.

and UVA is popular because of price to the people in Virginia. UVA can be like Dartmouth and popular to Virginians at the same time.

Also a frat culture and a drinking culture do not necessarily lead to rape culture

Both UVA and Dartmouth were in AAU studies on campus climate in the same year (2015). Results are pretty similar:

Among female undergraduates, 23.8 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering University of Virginia and 13.4 percent experienced this type of assault during the
current school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 11.4 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering University of
Virginia. Breaking this down further, 5.3% percent were victims of penetration with physical
force (no incapacitation) 6.0 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.8 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 17.7 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering University of Virginia, and 10.5 percent during the current school year. Since
entering University of Virginia, 12.0 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 7.6 percent using incapacitation only and 0.8 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Among female undergraduates, 27.9 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering Dartmouth College and 12 percent experienced this type of assault during the current
school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 13.3 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering Dartmouth College.
Breaking this down further, 6.2% percent were victims of penetration with physical force (no
incapacitation) 7.9 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.9 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 21.6 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering Dartmouth College, and 8.3 percent during the current school year. Since
entering Dartmouth College, 14.7 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 9 percent using incapacitation only and 0.7 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

Pp asked why people write off Dartmouth while UVA is attractive. Price is the answer

The criticisms of Dartmouth were about the environment, not the price. UVA has a similar frat culture, drinking culture, etc. That was the comparison.

and UVA is popular because of price to the people in Virginia. UVA can be like Dartmouth and popular to Virginians at the same time.

Also a frat culture and a drinking culture do not necessarily lead to rape culture

Both UVA and Dartmouth were in AAU studies on campus climate in the same year (2015). Results are pretty similar:

Among female undergraduates, 23.8 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering University of Virginia and 13.4 percent experienced this type of assault during the
current school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 11.4 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering University of
Virginia. Breaking this down further, 5.3% percent were victims of penetration with physical
force (no incapacitation) 6.0 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.8 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 17.7 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering University of Virginia, and 10.5 percent during the current school year. Since
entering University of Virginia, 12.0 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 7.6 percent using incapacitation only and 0.8 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Among female undergraduates, 27.9 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering Dartmouth College and 12 percent experienced this type of assault during the current
school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 13.3 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering Dartmouth College.
Breaking this down further, 6.2% percent were victims of penetration with physical force (no
incapacitation) 7.9 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.9 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 21.6 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering Dartmouth College, and 8.3 percent during the current school year. Since
entering Dartmouth College, 14.7 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 9 percent using incapacitation only and 0.7 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering University of Virginia exhibit a steady
increase by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when
victimization could have occurred. By senior year, 31.4 percent of female undergraduates
reported experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering Dartmouth College exhibit a steady increase
by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when victimization
could have occurred. By senior year, 33.8 percent of female undergraduates reported
experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Not that much difference. Why is Dartmouth being singled out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Well, if you insist:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/us/dartmouth-sexual-abuse-settlement.html
https://www.unionleader.com/news/crime/sharp-increase-in-sexual-assault-reports-at-dartmouth/article_ba8f2987-27f5-5042-a7c5-dd2abef003d6.html
https://www.vnews.com/Dartmouth-community-grapples-with-addressing-sexual-misconduct-31985484
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/27/dartmouth-sexual-assault-protest-cancels-classes/2117159/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/27/dartmouth-sexual-assault-protest-cancels-classes/2117159/
https://www.dartmouthspeaks.com

*Mic drop*

Please. Unless there is something from the WSJ, Washington examiner, National Review or NY post, don't even bother. The NY times with it's lying 1619 project is now only fit to be used as toilet paper. Same with USA today and left leaning BS papers. They have long given up covering anything factually and fairly

I actually can’t tell if this is sarcasm or not. Surely there aren’t people out there who think these are reputable publications? WSJ and National Review, ok, slanted but fine. The others? They are tabloids.

Tells you all you need to know about Dartmouth boosters.

With such distinguished alumni like Dinesh DSouza and Laura Ingraham...
Every Dartmouth alum I know who has liked the school has been conservative.

Robert Reich, Neal Katyal, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Jake Tapper also went to Dartmouth.

I went there and my friends were all very liberal. Yes, there is a group of douchebag Review types there who get a lot of press but overall I didn’t find it conservative at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Well, if you insist:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/us/dartmouth-sexual-abuse-settlement.html
https://www.unionleader.com/news/crime/sharp-increase-in-sexual-assault-reports-at-dartmouth/article_ba8f2987-27f5-5042-a7c5-dd2abef003d6.html
https://www.vnews.com/Dartmouth-community-grapples-with-addressing-sexual-misconduct-31985484
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/27/dartmouth-sexual-assault-protest-cancels-classes/2117159/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/27/dartmouth-sexual-assault-protest-cancels-classes/2117159/
https://www.dartmouthspeaks.com

*Mic drop*

Please. Unless there is something from the WSJ, Washington examiner, National Review or NY post, don't even bother. The NY times with it's lying 1619 project is now only fit to be used as toilet paper. Same with USA today and left leaning BS papers. They have long given up covering anything factually and fairly

I actually can’t tell if this is sarcasm or not. Surely there aren’t people out there who think these are reputable publications? WSJ and National Review, ok, slanted but fine. The others? They are tabloids.

Tells you all you need to know about Dartmouth boosters.

With such distinguished alumni like Dinesh DSouza and Laura Ingraham...
Every Dartmouth alum I know who has liked the school has been conservative.

Robert Reich, Neal Katyal, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Jake Tapper also went to Dartmouth.

I went there and my friends were all very liberal. Yes, there is a group of douchebag Review types there who get a lot of press but overall I didn’t find it conservative at all.

Do you seriously consider Robert Reich, Neal Katyal, or Jake Tapper to be liberal? Neal Katyal describes himself as an "extreme centrist" (whatever that means)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

Pp asked why people write off Dartmouth while UVA is attractive. Price is the answer

The criticisms of Dartmouth were about the environment, not the price. UVA has a similar frat culture, drinking culture, etc. That was the comparison.

But it's entire off campus at UVA and only about 32% participate. You can go all four years without every entering a sorority or frat house. You can also choose not to drink. Amazing!

If by participate you mean go to fraternity parties occasionally or regularly, it’s way more than 32%.

Of course I don't mean that. Total population of UVA that joins sororities or fraternities is only about 32% and dropping every year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

Pp asked why people write off Dartmouth while UVA is attractive. Price is the answer

The criticisms of Dartmouth were about the environment, not the price. UVA has a similar frat culture, drinking culture, etc. That was the comparison.

and UVA is popular because of price to the people in Virginia. UVA can be like Dartmouth and popular to Virginians at the same time.

Also a frat culture and a drinking culture do not necessarily lead to rape culture

Both UVA and Dartmouth were in AAU studies on campus climate in the same year (2015). Results are pretty similar:

Among female undergraduates, 23.8 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering University of Virginia and 13.4 percent experienced this type of assault during the
current school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 11.4 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering University of
Virginia. Breaking this down further, 5.3% percent were victims of penetration with physical
force (no incapacitation) 6.0 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.8 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 17.7 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering University of Virginia, and 10.5 percent during the current school year. Since
entering University of Virginia, 12.0 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 7.6 percent using incapacitation only and 0.8 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Among female undergraduates, 27.9 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering Dartmouth College and 12 percent experienced this type of assault during the current
school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 13.3 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering Dartmouth College.
Breaking this down further, 6.2% percent were victims of penetration with physical force (no
incapacitation) 7.9 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.9 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 21.6 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering Dartmouth College, and 8.3 percent during the current school year. Since
entering Dartmouth College, 14.7 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 9 percent using incapacitation only and 0.7 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering University of Virginia exhibit a steady
increase by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when
victimization could have occurred. By senior year, 31.4 percent of female undergraduates
reported experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering Dartmouth College exhibit a steady increase
by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when victimization
could have occurred. By senior year, 33.8 percent of female undergraduates reported
experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Not that much difference. Why is Dartmouth being singled out?

Perhaps because you are citing something six years ago and isn't taking place now at UVA. My DD graduated (well, no ceremony but finished) in 2020 and didn't have any of the experiences you list above. I asked her about it and she said her friends didn't either. UVA has something like 900 clubs and is much larger than Dartmouth. Anyone can find a group of friends and interests that they like at UVA. That's harder to do so in a smaller school like Dartmouth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

Pp asked why people write off Dartmouth while UVA is attractive. Price is the answer

The criticisms of Dartmouth were about the environment, not the price. UVA has a similar frat culture, drinking culture, etc. That was the comparison.

and UVA is popular because of price to the people in Virginia. UVA can be like Dartmouth and popular to Virginians at the same time.

Also a frat culture and a drinking culture do not necessarily lead to rape culture

Both UVA and Dartmouth were in AAU studies on campus climate in the same year (2015). Results are pretty similar:

Among female undergraduates, 23.8 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering University of Virginia and 13.4 percent experienced this type of assault during the
current school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 11.4 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering University of
Virginia. Breaking this down further, 5.3% percent were victims of penetration with physical
force (no incapacitation) 6.0 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.8 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 17.7 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering University of Virginia, and 10.5 percent during the current school year. Since
entering University of Virginia, 12.0 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 7.6 percent using incapacitation only and 0.8 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Among female undergraduates, 27.9 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering Dartmouth College and 12 percent experienced this type of assault during the current
school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 13.3 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering Dartmouth College.
Breaking this down further, 6.2% percent were victims of penetration with physical force (no
incapacitation) 7.9 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.9 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 21.6 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering Dartmouth College, and 8.3 percent during the current school year. Since
entering Dartmouth College, 14.7 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 9 percent using incapacitation only and 0.7 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering University of Virginia exhibit a steady
increase by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when
victimization could have occurred. By senior year, 31.4 percent of female undergraduates
reported experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering Dartmouth College exhibit a steady increase
by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when victimization
could have occurred. By senior year, 33.8 percent of female undergraduates reported
experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Not that much difference. Why is Dartmouth being singled out?

Perhaps because you are citing something six years ago and isn't taking place now at UVA. My DD graduated (well, no ceremony but finished) in 2020 and didn't have any of the experiences you list above. I asked her about it and she said her friends didn't either. UVA has something like 900 clubs and is much larger than Dartmouth. Anyone can find a group of friends and interests that they like at UVA. That's harder to do so in a smaller school like Dartmouth.

You ask one person. The report was based on input from 1/3rd of all students. Again, why is Dartmouth being singled out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth’s gross. Always has been. Can’t think of a less relevant, more self-important school.

It always seemed to be to have some similarities to UVA (with the obvious size difference noted). Why are people so quick write off all of Dartmouth off when it has some similar traits that makes UVA attractive to people in Virginia?

UVA is attractive because it's a flagship that costs 35k a year instate. Dartmouth's cost to attend is 77k

About half of Dartmouth’s student body receives financial aid that averages $57k a year.

Pp asked why people write off Dartmouth while UVA is attractive. Price is the answer

The criticisms of Dartmouth were about the environment, not the price. UVA has a similar frat culture, drinking culture, etc. That was the comparison.

and UVA is popular because of price to the people in Virginia. UVA can be like Dartmouth and popular to Virginians at the same time.

Also a frat culture and a drinking culture do not necessarily lead to rape culture

Both UVA and Dartmouth were in AAU studies on campus climate in the same year (2015). Results are pretty similar:

Among female undergraduates, 23.8 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering University of Virginia and 13.4 percent experienced this type of assault during the
current school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 11.4 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering University of
Virginia. Breaking this down further, 5.3% percent were victims of penetration with physical
force (no incapacitation) 6.0 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.8 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 17.7 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering University of Virginia, and 10.5 percent during the current school year. Since
entering University of Virginia, 12.0 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 7.6 percent using incapacitation only and 0.8 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Among female undergraduates, 27.9 percent experienced this type of assault since
entering Dartmouth College and 12 percent experienced this type of assault during the current
school year (Table 3.1a). Among female undergraduates 13.3 percent were victims of
nonconsensual penetration involving force or incapacitation since entering Dartmouth College.
Breaking this down further, 6.2% percent were victims of penetration with physical force (no
incapacitation) 7.9 percent were victims of a sexual assault involving penetration by
incapacitation (no physical force), and 1.9 percent were victims of this type of assault by both
physical force and incapacitation.
With respect to sexual touching, 21.6 percent of female undergraduates were victims
since entering Dartmouth College, and 8.3 percent during the current school year. Since
entering Dartmouth College, 14.7 percent were victims of this type of assault using physical
force only, 9 percent using incapacitation only and 0.7 percent was victims of nonconsensual
sexual touching, with both physical force and incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering University of Virginia exhibit a steady
increase by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when
victimization could have occurred. By senior year, 31.4 percent of female undergraduates
reported experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Patterns for undergraduates since entering Dartmouth College exhibit a steady increase
by year in school, as would be expected given the increased time period when victimization
could have occurred. By senior year, 33.8 percent of female undergraduates reported
experiencing nonconsensual penetration or sexual touching by force or incapacitation.

Not that much difference. Why is Dartmouth being singled out?

Perhaps because you are citing something six years ago and isn't taking place now at UVA. My DD graduated (well, no ceremony but finished) in 2020 and didn't have any of the experiences you list above. I asked her about it and she said her friends didn't either. UVA has something like 900 clubs and is much larger than Dartmouth. Anyone can find a group of friends and interests that they like at UVA. That's harder to do so in a smaller school like Dartmouth.

You ask one person. The report was based on input from 1/3rd of all students. Again, why is Dartmouth being singled out?

There is another AAU campus climate study on UVA for 2019, so only a year back. The numbers for UVA are very similar to what they were in 2015. I chose 2015 because there were reports on Dartmouth and UVA in that same year. What statistical evidence is there that Dartmouth is different from other schools like UVA? If there isn't any, why the singled out smear job here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Well, if you insist:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/06/us/dartmouth-sexual-abuse-settlement.html
https://www.unionleader.com/news/crime/sharp-increase-in-sexual-assault-reports-at-dartmouth/article_ba8f2987-27f5-5042-a7c5-dd2abef003d6.html
https://www.vnews.com/Dartmouth-community-grapples-with-addressing-sexual-misconduct-31985484
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/27/dartmouth-sexual-assault-protest-cancels-classes/2117159/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/27/dartmouth-sexual-assault-protest-cancels-classes/2117159/
https://www.dartmouthspeaks.com

*Mic drop*

Please. Unless there is something from the WSJ, Washington examiner, National Review or NY post, don't even bother. The NY times with it's lying 1619 project is now only fit to be used as toilet paper. Same with USA today and left leaning BS papers. They have long given up covering anything factually and fairly

I actually can’t tell if this is sarcasm or not. Surely there aren’t people out there who think these are reputable publications? WSJ and National Review, ok, slanted but fine. The others? They are tabloids.

Tells you all you need to know about Dartmouth boosters.

With such distinguished alumni like Dinesh DSouza and Laura Ingraham...
Every Dartmouth alum I know who has liked the school has been conservative.

Robert Reich, Neal Katyal, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Jake Tapper also went to Dartmouth.

I went there and my friends were all very liberal. Yes, there is a group of douchebag Review types there who get a lot of press but overall I didn’t find it conservative at all.

Do you seriously consider Robert Reich, Neal Katyal, or Jake Tapper to be liberal? Neal Katyal describes himself as an "extreme centrist" (whatever that means)

No. Did I say that? I provided examples of other notable alumni who are not conservative. Reich yes is liberal.. The other two are moderates, so not "conservative.". Then I said MY friends were liberal. Then I say overall I didn't find it to be conservative.

Honestly the lack of reading comprhension prevalent on this site is something else. People are so primed to attack they just see words and then spew a response.

[Anonymous]

^^This.

[Anonymous]

Fred Rogers and Robert Frost also went to Dartmouth.
I have recent experience with the school and it’s been a wonderful place for my liberal, not sorority-oriented child. There are jerks everywhere and the school has done a lot in recent years to address these things.

[Anonymous]

This is a bit of an aside -- but if you do have a student that suffered an assault while away at college - How did you handle it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fred Rogers and Robert Frost also went to Dartmouth.
I have recent experience with the school and it’s been a wonderful place for my liberal, not sorority-oriented child. There are jerks everywhere and the school has done a lot in recent years to address these things.

Fred Rogers left Dartmouth after a year because he found it to be a "beer soaked, jock-strap party school." Seems like not much has changed.

https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2019/12/03/the-radical-mr-rogers/