My kid spend 1-2 hours on math strategies, and an hour in class reading for pleasure and an hour writing (creatively and about the book she’s reading). And that’s her day, plus lunch, recess and PE/specials. No social studies/Geography or science or spelling, grammar, vocabulary. |
|
It is tragic how so many schools are teaching writing. There is a popular program that many schools use called Lucy Calkins Writing Workshop. A typical day would be the teacher reads a book to the student or does a 10 minute mini-lesson, then the students "write, write, write" for 30 to 35 minutes, then they share what they have written. Students are told not to worry about spelling, grammar, punctuation when they write. It is more important to just get ideas on the paper. If a teacher walks by and sees a 2nd or 3rd grade student write something like this:
Nowe I am going to tel you about my cat it is the best cat in the werld and my cat is soooooooo ahsome wen it comes and plays with me do you want to see my cat your going to realy like him!!!!!!!!!!! the teacher will not immediately correct any of the errors. The student will continue to fill the page making mistake after mistake. Then the last five minutes they might do peer editing. Teachers are told not to discourage students or crush their "self-expression". What is important is the student is filling the entire page and writing about an authentic experience. Wow, the student is now an "author". Now imagine writing like that day after day. |
Yes! I’m the PP above you and my child’s school uses that program. They call it reading writing workshop. And that’s allllllll they do all day long. Every day. It’s the weirdest experience that in education. But the principal and administrators love it. Which confuses me. There just be something good about it?? But, I see zero improvement in my child and she’s hungry to learn about other stuff! |
| I’m so sorry for typos 😬 ^^ |
What they love about it is that it is easy for them. So great that the best approach for kids is also the easiest for teachers! |
I am using rod and staff right now with my 4th and 1st graders. It’s very thorough. My 4th Fraser is diagramming sentences. The daily lessons are very efficient and very Mennonite. |
I’m on my phone and used very two too many times. |
Agreed. Quite a lot of grammar in 3rd. |
| I was surprised at the amount of "free independent reading" in my dc FCPS elementary school. A whole hour each morning and another 20 minutes in the afternoon. That's a lot of instructional time. |
Catholic schools still use a more classical approach. I taught High school as a special education teacher and I was an administrator at classical school for 1 year. CE is a game changer for kids—all kids. The language development in the grammar stage is amazing. |
| I have worked in schools and seen the havoc this benevolent neglect wreaks. In my reading groups, I taught grammar and refused to post any assignment that had not been rewritten to my exacting standards. Having a piece on the wall in my classroom was an achievement, not a reward for breathing and sitting in a chair. I also correct any student who brags about having good writing skills because virtually none of them do. Students today have been victimized by our culture of unearned praise. Many believe that the purpose of school is "to have fun." I disabuse them of that notion on the first day of school. Poetry, philosophy, and history can be understood and discussed by young children as Marva Collins proved when working with students who came from underprivileged backgrounds. |
| That’s not even writing. That’s grammar. I’m a high school teacher. I do teach writing. The problem is the massive focus on STEM means many parents and kids don’t see the value in teaching writing as a craft. They think “my kid knows how to read and write” and encourage all effort goes into math and science classes . Kids toss off a crappy draft and want to be done. |
NP here. It's probably both easy and hard for teachers. Easy because being so focused on fluency, there's little direct instruction in language mechanics. But the projects are time consuming and hard to fit it in, if it's an add-on to an existing curriculum. Our MCPS elementary flirted with Lucy Calkins while we were still on Curriculum 2.0. Thank goodness that when the new Benchmark Advance curriculum was rolled out, they dropped LC for lack of time. |
OP here, I completely agree with you. I think the first few years of elementary school should be nothing more than grammar, handwriting, and memorization. There is plenty of time later in middle school to teach them history, social studies, etc. They don't understand that stuff in second grade anyway. Sure, they learn about MLK, but none of them understand the importance of what he did. So teach them how to write properly in elementary. |
I work in STEM. Writing skills are still required, including the basics. The book “The Math Myth” does an excellent job explaining why the STEM focus does a disservice to every area of learning. |