Before ACA this was NOT true. |
| OP, thanks for posting this. DH and I are mid-thirties and we would love to retire early. No way could we afford $4k monthly insurance premiums for any extended period of time. I will be working until I die! |
New poster here, I have followed him for a long time. I really enjoy his blog and how much detail he gives, but he comes across as pretty smug sometimes. Some of the comments he makes and the way he talks about money really rub me the wrong way. He talks about certain kinds of grants that he wants to get for his kids for college for being low income while having a $2 million net worth. Get out of here |
Really? I worked at multiple different employers prior to ACA and none offered health insurance w pre-existing clause. |
NP here and I remember they used to issie some type of letter when you left a job verifying you had qualifying coverage or something like that. You could still get insurance but I think pre existing conditions werent covered for a year or something if you had a gao in coverage. |
| Why not use a HDHP, OP? We find the premium difference makes up for the high deductible and then some. We’ve come out ahead doing this. |
Not sure this is correct, but I suppose it could be. However, there are many options out there for health insurance. Some cost more, some cost less. I retired this past year at 61, my partner is same age. I also have a 24YO son in law school that I need to cover. I was paying $1400/month for a HD family plan. Since my son will be 26 and still a student, thus not eligible for my plan due to his age, I moved him onto a student plan at his university. The cost was “only” $300/month. My premium for my plan dropped almost $500/month to about $925. This was a real savings for me so I moved him early to it, knowing I would have had to move him at some point down the road. I am now investigating other options for my own plan to see if I can find further savings in the marketplace. IMO, many people just blindly pay their insurance premiums of all types (health, life, homeowners, Auto...) without doing their due diligence. |
It is cheap as heck for retirees from active duty (who are as young as 38) and age 60+ reservists. It’s $1038/mo this year for younger retired reservists under age 60. Sucks if you’re like my husband and did active duty for a long time before switching to reserves, but keep getting activated as a reservist / frequently away anyway, but don’t get the active benefits.... sigh. But really this thread is making me really grateful we’ll get access to the $1038/mo insurance. |
DP. I was told by two different doctors that the care for routine issues - a broken leg, strep throat, etc. - are fine, but they fall short when specialists are needed. A friend of mine has a muscular disorder, and they won't pay for physical therapy. |
I’m 55 and DH is 60. We both work and make good money. I cover the health insurance (Kaiser Permanente) and pay $240 per pay period. We are a family of 4 with two teenagers. The subsidized health insurance is an incentive for me to work another 10 years. I don’t want to think what we would pay if we were retired or unemployed. OP, thanks for letting me know. |
He should have stayed active duty. He knew hew was giving up the insurance when he choose to leave active duty. The choice was his. I never get comments like this. |
In fact, the law requires that health care be portable between jobs (and did, even prior to Obamacare). |
Lisbon. DH recently wrote publicly about our move in financial terms (a big part of the savings comes from not being stuck in the US health net) & includes a link to a spreadsheet that might help compare the cost of staying in pace vs retiring overseas using your own, personal numbers: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4210988-suze-ormans-take-fire-movement. For questions beyond that, you can write directly to him on SA. I’ll stop commenting here, as I think OP’s post isn’t so much about escaping overseas as it is about figuring out a way to cope with quickly escalating health costs while staying in place in the US. |
|
I do not remember which law, but it was in the 90's (Pres. Clinton) who signed it that made it so pre-existing conditions were not an issue with employer sponsored health care. Maybe HIPAA was the law. I will say that today, if health care was not an expense, I could retire early (55). However, because of a few chronic conditions (Cancer, Diabetes, Heart Disease) I can not risk being without insurance. I will retire when eligible for Medicare. |