Pitt Jolie custody

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She's awful.


So is he.


...

He is from the heart of the midwest and the buckle of the Bible belt, Springfield, Missouri. He went to Mizzou and just missed graduating.

You don't get much more midwest than Missouri.


His parents are in Oklahoma, I thought he was from there. My bad. (That said, the Bible Belt is the Southeast.)

This is all beside the point: they're both nuts and none of us knows as much as the judge on this case about which one is more nuts. That judge took custody from him in the first place, and is doling it out sparingly now. Hopefully they can get their acts together and coparent.

The mother of one of my friends went to college with him and said that he was really weird. For whatever that’s worth....


Weird how? We want details!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:His 'substance abuse' is so inflated by the media and especially by Angelina.
Was there ever any scandals with him under the influence for all these years? And no, what ever happened with Maddox doesn't count. Because we don't know what happened on that plane, really.


He's admitted and opened up about this substance abuse problems, not her. It's pretty clear it's a problem.


Actually it's not clear at all. Was he ever in caught in public or otherwise for his substance abuse, like let's say - Charlie Sheen? And why not? Him admitting anything is just to do with terrible PR, feeding American favorite confession stories about guilt and transformation.
Try to sell that in France or Italy 'an actor who drinks' - big deal!
Anonymous
Anyone here who does not know both individuals personally, yet thinks they know all about what is going on with this couple is insane.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can't understand why he barely has visitation. The new order gives him chunks of time/hours a day with one or two kids at a time. Weird.


Very weird.


It's the same thing that happened with the Jon & Kate + 8 kids. Maybe they always do that with large family groups to ensure each set of kids gets adequate individual time with the non-primary parent.


Yes, it's a transition focused on relationship building. He gets them for more than a week at a time on his own later this summer.


But that's not normal.

Regular people split custody 50-50, including overnights.

I get that he got drunk and they had a fight on a plane, but that's not a legit reason to keep him away from his kids. The should have 50-50 custody. They are rich enough to afford to fly a where and rent luxury homes and hire staff to support such an arrangement.


Not everyone splits 50/50. It’s still not the norm in my social circle.
Anonymous
I think that they are secretly trying to reconcile behind the scenes.

I mean they are both extremely attractive & will never be able to “trade-up” to anyone better because they are the best.

Or they are at least sleeping together.

Because neither have been seen dating other people since they split up.
There have been rumors......
But nothing tangible.
Anonymous
No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.


+1. Or at least she hates him. The Brad Pitt chapter of her life is over.

Agree with PP that he doesn't seem like the brightest light. AJ has been running rings around him in the separation/divorce and the PR. Maybe this is a sign of the pendulum swinging back a bit.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.


+1. Or at least she hates him. The Brad Pitt chapter of her life is over.

Agree with PP that he doesn't seem like the brightest light. AJ has been running rings around him in the separation/divorce and the PR. Maybe this is a sign of the pendulum swinging back a bit.


Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can't understand why he barely has visitation. The new order gives him chunks of time/hours a day with one or two kids at a time. Weird.


Very weird.


It's the same thing that happened with the Jon & Kate + 8 kids. Maybe they always do that with large family groups to ensure each set of kids gets adequate individual time with the non-primary parent.


Yes, it's a transition focused on relationship building. He gets them for more than a week at a time on his own later this summer.


But that's not normal.

Regular people split custody 50-50, including overnights.

I get that he got drunk and they had a fight on a plane, but that's not a legit reason to keep him away from his kids. The should have 50-50 custody. They are rich enough to afford to fly a where and rent luxury homes and hire staff to support such an arrangement.


Not everyone splits 50/50. It’s still not the norm in my social circle.


50/50 Split would be rare in any circumstances. It's very hard for kids to spend fifty percent of their time in one household and fifty percent in another household. Most children have a primary home base and then visit the other parent. They have close contact with the other parent, but children need a home, a school, a neighborhood, and friends. They can't spend fifty percent of their time in one home and fifty percent of their time in another unless there is a rare instance where parents own neighboring condos or some such thing. I've personally never worked on a case of 50/50 custody, unless this poster is confusing legal custody and physical custody. Legal custody can be 50/50 but physical custody is rarely 50/50.

Brad may have legal custody of his kids and share that 50/50. What is being worked out here is physical custody and visitation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:His 'substance abuse' is so inflated by the media and especially by Angelina.
Was there ever any scandals with him under the influence for all these years? And no, what ever happened with Maddox doesn't count. Because we don't know what happened on that plane, really.


He's admitted and opened up about this substance abuse problems, not her. It's pretty clear it's a problem.


And?

Plenty of alcoholics and addicts end up with joint custody or visitation schedules far more generous than what Brad has.


Must be more to the story. I’m betting she had a plan and recorded a bunch of things before the split.

Plenty of alcoholics drive drink with their kids regularly. Just because it’s common doesn’t make it okay.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.

Yeah, she was in the running to be a un ambassador at large and now a court has ruled she’s harming her kids relationship with their dad? She will hate him until forever. No reconciliation here. She will marry a fat bald billionaire and buy whatever international political position she wants.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They are both Satanists. The kids lose out. Poor little things.


Are they really?

Scary.


Seriously? That's all it takes for you to believe something obviously ridiculous?


She did pretend to be a vampire for a while and kept vials of blood around her neck, so that would be a natural next step.

Not so unbelievable for her.


I wore and did some crazy stuff 15 years ago/in my 20s too... ltalk to some late 90s goth kids about it and see what they say.

Not even addressing the Illumanti garbage.. people are so gullible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.


+1. Or at least she hates him. The Brad Pitt chapter of her life is over.

Agree with PP that he doesn't seem like the brightest light. AJ has been running rings around him in the separation/divorce and the PR. Maybe this is a sign of the pendulum swinging back a bit.


Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.


+1

Maybe she should shut her big mouth.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.


+1

Maybe she should shut her big mouth.


I liked this from CNN:

"A representative for Pitt declined to comment on this story.
"This misleading leak is not in the best interests of the children. From the start, Angelina has been focused only on their health and needs, which is why it was so important that this last court hearing be conducted privately," a spokesperson for Jolie said in a statement to CNN. "It's deplorable that someone, for their own selfish reasons, leaked selective portions of the confidential and sealed court record to create an inaccurate and unfair picture of what is really happening."

CNN obtained the order, which was not sealed, from the court."

Zing! Well played, CNN.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.


+1

Maybe she should shut her big mouth.


I liked this from CNN:

"A representative for Pitt declined to comment on this story.
"This misleading leak is not in the best interests of the children. From the start, Angelina has been focused only on their health and needs, which is why it was so important that this last court hearing be conducted privately," a spokesperson for Jolie said in a statement to CNN. "It's deplorable that someone, for their own selfish reasons, leaked selective portions of the confidential and sealed court record to create an inaccurate and unfair picture of what is really happening."

CNN obtained the order, which was not sealed, from the court."

Zing! Well played, CNN.


LOL wow! Her crazy is starting to show (again). I don't understand why she'd want to completely deny her children access to their father after all of the issues she had with her own father. She was always clearly very bitter about it and you'd think she'd want to ensure her children had what she didn't. Also, how could her attorneys not realize that the order wasn't sealed?!
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: