Pitt Jolie custody

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.

+1. Or at least she hates him. The Brad Pitt chapter of her life is over.

Agree with PP that he doesn't seem like the brightest light. AJ has been running rings around him in the separation/divorce and the PR. Maybe this is a sign of the pendulum swinging back a bit.

Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.

I am a big brad pitt fan but I strongly agree. Almost all leaks in the aftermath of the original event seem to have come from his camp as they try to paint him in the better light. This case was supposed to be sealed, who do you think leaked the 'AJ accused of parental alienation' bit.

At the end of the day it takes two to tango and it takes a LOT to get a judge to restrict your access to your kids like this. I think his behavior was a lot worse than has been reported. I hope for the sake of the kids he can clean up and she can figure out how to be amicable and they can both go on to be good parents to their kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.

+1. Or at least she hates him. The Brad Pitt chapter of her life is over.

Agree with PP that he doesn't seem like the brightest light. AJ has been running rings around him in the separation/divorce and the PR. Maybe this is a sign of the pendulum swinging back a bit.

Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.

I am a big brad pitt fan but I strongly agree. Almost all leaks in the aftermath of the original event seem to have come from his camp as they try to paint him in the better light. This case was supposed to be sealed, who do you think leaked the 'AJ accused of parental alienation' bit.

At the end of the day it takes two to tango and it takes a LOT to get a judge to restrict your access to your kids like this. I think his behavior was a lot worse than has been reported. I hope for the sake of the kids he can clean up and she can figure out how to be amicable and they can both go on to be good parents to their kids.

Strongly disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No way will they reconcile. They hate each other, and now she's been publicly accused of parental alienation. Poor kids.

+1. Or at least she hates him. The Brad Pitt chapter of her life is over.

Agree with PP that he doesn't seem like the brightest light. AJ has been running rings around him in the separation/divorce and the PR. Maybe this is a sign of the pendulum swinging back a bit.

Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.

I am a big brad pitt fan but I strongly agree. Almost all leaks in the aftermath of the original event seem to have come from his camp as they try to paint him in the better light. This case was supposed to be sealed, who do you think leaked the 'AJ accused of parental alienation' bit.

At the end of the day it takes two to tango and it takes a LOT to get a judge to restrict your access to your kids like this. I think his behavior was a lot worse than has been reported. I hope for the sake of the kids he can clean up and she can figure out how to be amicable and they can both go on to be good parents to their kids.

Strongly disagree.

CNN said it wasn't sealed. They got the order straight from the court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

Does she do volunteer work with any kids' groups or schools, etc? Has she tried to adopt? Does she babysit or interact a lot with the children of friends and family members? Obviously, I don't know her; but she appears very disinterested in children. I can't think of one picture that I've ever seen of her holding a child or the hand of a child. She's just always posing for a camera, either alone or with her SO at the moment of the picture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Disagree. He has given her plenty of rope that she has used against herself. He has also acted in the children's best interest, PR-wise.

+1

Maybe she should shut her big mouth.

I liked this from CNN:

"A representative for Pitt declined to comment on this story.
"This misleading leak is not in the best interests of the children. From the start, Angelina has been focused only on their health and needs, which is why it was so important that this last court hearing be conducted privately," a spokesperson for Jolie said in a statement to CNN. "It's deplorable that someone, for their own selfish reasons, leaked selective portions of the confidential and sealed court record to create an inaccurate and unfair picture of what is really happening."

CNN obtained the order, which was not sealed, from the court."

Zing! Well played, CNN.

LOL wow! Her crazy is starting to show (again). I don't understand why she'd want to completely deny her children access to their father after all of the issues she had with her own father. She was always clearly very bitter about it and you'd think she'd want to ensure her children had what she didn't. Also, how could her attorneys not realize that the order wasn't sealed?!

Because she is estranged from her father and has daddy issues? Because she is trying to screw Brad over? Because she is self-centered and narcissistic and doesn't think the kids need a parent other than her? Who knows?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

Does she do volunteer work with any kids' groups or schools, etc? Has she tried to adopt? Does she babysit or interact a lot with the children of friends and family members? Obviously, I don't know her; but she appears very disinterested in children. I can't think of one picture that I've ever seen of her holding a child or the hand of a child. She's just always posing for a camera, either alone or with her SO at the moment of the picture.

She is supposedly close with and dotes on her goddaughter Coco (Courtney's daughter)

[Anonymous]

Doesn’t Jennifer Anniston do charity work for St Jude’s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

I like Jennifer Aniston, but if she wanted to have children, then she'd have children. She's 49 and has tons of money. She and Brad had been married for a while, and she was in her 30's when she married & subsequently divorced him. If they were both serious about having children and not just "planning" on it, then they would have had them.

I don't understand why people keep bringing up Jennifer. Yes, Angelina's nuts, but it's not like Brad's only two options are Jennifer or Angelina.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

I like Jennifer Aniston, but if she wanted to have children, then she'd have children. She's 49 and has tons of money. She and Brad had been married for a while, and she was in her 30's when she married & subsequently divorced him. If they were both serious about having children and not just "planning" on it, then they would have had them.

I don't understand why people keep bringing up Jennifer. Yes, Angelina's nuts, but it's not like Brad's only two options are Jennifer or Angelina.

+1. If JA wanted kids, she would have them. She obviously doesn't want them, which is fine.

[Anonymous]

I heard that Jennifer suffered a miscarriage with Brad, and that was why the storyline in By The Sea was sort of a slap in the face to JA by AJ.

I despise Jolie.

I can see why JA may have wanted kids if she had a husband to raise them with but not want to be a single parent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard that Jennifer suffered a miscarriage with Brad, and that was why the storyline in By The Sea was sort of a slap in the face to JA by AJ.

I despise Jolie.

I can see why JA may have wanted kids if she had a husband to raise them with but not want to be a single parent.

NP here. She's had two husbands.
I'm Team Jennifer, BTW. I just don't believe she really wants kids, or she would have them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

I like Jennifer Aniston, but if she wanted to have children, then she'd have children. She's 49 and has tons of money. She and Brad had been married for a while, and she was in her 30's when she married & subsequently divorced him. If they were both serious about having children and not just "planning" on it, then they would have had them.

I don't understand why people keep bringing up Jennifer. Yes, Angelina's nuts, but it's not like Brad's only two options are Jennifer or Angelina.

+1. If JA wanted kids, she would have them. She obviously doesn't want them, which is fine.

Or it could be that she wants kids, but does not want to go through fertility treatment or a surrogate so she has accepted not having children.

Some women do feel this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

Okay, but I'm not buying it. If she wanted kids, surely after this many years she would be a mother. There is no shame in not wanting children. I don't fault her for it, but there was no need for him to stay if the two of them had different desires regarding child rearing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm leaning in favor of that ruling. She seems super controlling, and I think Pitt's heart is in the right place.

He should never have divorced Jennifer Aniston.

He would still be childless. He wanted to become a father. Anniston didn’t want children.

Jennifer Aniston has said that she and Brad were absolutely planning to have children before they divorced.

Does she do volunteer work with any kids' groups or schools, etc? Has she tried to adopt? Does she babysit or interact a lot with the children of friends and family members? Obviously, I don't know her; but she appears very disinterested in children. I can't think of one picture that I've ever seen of her holding a child or the hand of a child. She's just always posing for a camera, either alone or with her SO at the moment of the picture.

Oh please. I know tons of women who desperately want kids who don't advertise it or "volunteer with kids." Give me a freaking break.