Brigitte Nielsen Is Pregnant at 54

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't she already have reached menopause? What kind of hormonal support would make carrying the baby possible?

You don’t know that. I didn’t reach menopause until 57.

[Anonymous]

So whose egg did she use?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not my thing (though my grandmother had her youngest of 7 at 49--strict Catholic, no birth control) but we wouldn't bat an eye if the father was 54 and the wife 39.

Because women of 39 are of childbearing age. 54 is post menopausal. Nature did not intend for women to have babies at 54.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just hope she has a good M.D. because the chances of carrying that child full-term, then being born at a healthy weight, w/no birth defects are nil.

And Down Syndrome is a very high possibility at her age.

When the child graduates from High School, she will be 73.
A tad past retirement age.
Yikes.

Im sure she has done all the genetic testing that can be done, no down syndrome.

[Anonymous]

Alec Baldwin's wife just had their 4th child -- he is 60.

George Clooney was 56 when Amal had their twins.

Such a double standard -- where is the outrage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin's wife just had their 4th child -- he is 60.

George Clooney was 56 when Amal had their twins.

Such a double standard -- where is the outrage?[/quote]

Don't be dim. It's because SHE, the 54 year old, has to actually conceive and carry the child in HER body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin's wife just had their 4th child -- he is 60.

George Clooney was 56 when Amal had their twins.

Such a double standard -- where is the outrage?[/quote]

Don't be dim. It's because SHE, the 54 year old, has to actually conceive and carry the child in HER body.

I am anything but dim. The outrage on this forum seems to be aimed at Brigitte being a retiree or debilitated by the time her baby is a young adult. Or heaven forbid, she is dead by the time her baby has children and deprives them of a grandmother.

Does anyone say such things about Alec or George?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My oldest son is 24 and he would be all "Uh Mom, this is a little ridiculous, don't you think?" if I had a kid now, and I'm not even 45!

Well maybe in bumbf*ck Idaho or wherever you're from that's typical--but here in the big city, I was 44 with 2 2 year olds and had my 3rd at 45. Get over yourself.

uhhh...you are aware that 45 is not 54, right?

I'm 2 years younger than Brigette Nielsen and I think she's nuts for a having a baby at her age when she already has adult children. There will be a 34 year age difference between her oldest child and her youngest child. She will be 88 years old when her youngest is 34.

What’s your point? When my dad was 88, I was 39. He was sharp as a tack until he died 2 years later. We had years of quality time together.

You were very lucky to have a dad who was sharp as a tack, and I'm assuming healthy and independent, until he died at the age of 90. Just be aware that there are nursing homes full of elderly people who are a decade or more younger than your father was when he died.

Bridget Nielsen has the good fortune of having 4 healthy, adult children who will very likely be giving her grandchildren soon if they haven't already. She will quite literally be of retirement village age on her next birthday. Why on earth does she need to be pregnant at her age? Doesn't she realize that she very literally looks like a pregnant senior citizen which is just bizarre and will get no less bizarre as she continues to age? What exactly is she trying to prove? What happens if she has some sort of major health setback during labor and delivery? Will it be up to her adult children to take care of the baby while they try to find appropriate care for their mother?

And do realize, that while your dad likely naturally fathered you, Bridgette Nielsen has almost certainly had some sort of heavy duty medical intervention to make this pregnancy happen. She's selfish.



My dad was 30 and my mom was 27 when I was born. They both died before I turned 35. Life and death are unpredictable. Pp sounds like she had an amazing life with her father and she enjoyed a few more years with him than I got with my own amazing dad.

[Anonymous]

PPP, Brigitte is married to her baby's father. If there is a health problem with her or the baby, I would assume he will care for her and their baby. He is only 39 years old. I would expect that her other children would be involved in this child's life, too.

Why can't you be happy for her? Must everyone be judged? Is it any of your business?

I am rooting for them.

[Anonymous]

to me it looks like he wanted to have children and this was their best/only way to get there together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin's wife just had their 4th child -- he is 60.

George Clooney was 56 when Amal had their twins.

Such a double standard -- where is the outrage?

Well because biologically men can father children at those ages.... and before people talk about the implications of using older sperm...99% of this children are perfectly fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My oldest son is 24 and he would be all "Uh Mom, this is a little ridiculous, don't you think?" if I had a kid now, and I'm not even 45!

Well maybe in bumbf*ck Idaho or wherever you're from that's typical--but here in the big city, I was 44 with 2 2 year olds and had my 3rd at 45. Get over yourself.

Wow thats old. You could be their grandma. Obviously these weren't spontaneous pregnancies.

It's so obvious when people have twins with a first pregnancy in their 40's and I'd bet money that she used donor eggs. The defensiveness gives it away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin's wife just had their 4th child -- he is 60.

George Clooney was 56 when Amal had their twins.

Such a double standard -- where is the outrage?[/quote]

Don't be dim. It's because SHE, the 54 year old, has to actually conceive and carry the child in HER body.

I am anything but dim. The outrage on this forum seems to be aimed at Brigitte being a retiree or debilitated by the time her baby is a young adult. Or heaven forbid, she is dead by the time her baby has children and deprives them of a grandmother.

Does anyone say such things about Alec or George?

If Alec and George were taking hormone shots, walking around with pregnant bellies and trying to put their aging, older middle aged bodies through labor and delivery, they would also be getting eye rolls. As it is, they both have younger wives who are of natural child bearing age who are doing the physical work of pregnancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alec Baldwin's wife just had their 4th child -- he is 60.

George Clooney was 56 when Amal had their twins.

Such a double standard -- where is the outrage?[/quote]

Don't be dim. It's because SHE, the 54 year old, has to actually conceive and carry the child in HER body.

I am anything but dim. The outrage on this forum seems to be aimed at Brigitte being a retiree or debilitated by the time her baby is a young adult. Or heaven forbid, she is dead by the time her baby has children and deprives them of a grandmother.

Does anyone say such things about Alec or George?

If Alec and George were taking hormone shots, walking around with pregnant bellies and trying to put their aging, older middle aged bodies through labor and delivery, they would also be getting eye rolls. As it is, they both have younger wives who are of natural child bearing age who are doing the physical work of pregnancy.

NP. You are still missing PPs point, likely on purpose. But, you keep on being obtuse.

[Anonymous]

I wish them all the best. A child is a blessing.