Good for you! So what are you complaining about? |
| She is complaining about the stigma of having an ASD education label. To parents of kids with ASD who have an IEP under autism. The lifelong stigma it will carry and how autism in general is overdiagnosed. Like it is a choice.... |
|
These labels carry throughout kids school careers so potentially it can impact future academics and even college admissions. It is a big deal. Look at the school person who posted before saying how she treats all Merld assuming the worst in their functioning when that may not be the case. |
You are missing the entire point of the thread. She is showing why the issue for concern. |
Agreed. Hate it called a spectrum. It really confuses people. |
There are only 13 categories and most schools care more about services and the delivery of those services than the actual category under which your child will receive services. Again, it is an "educational label" not a medical misdiagnosis to fit every child with SN under one of these categories for an .iEP. |
If that's how you took it, that's too bad. What I'm actually saying is parents having their kid evaluated need to do their homework: select an evaluator who knows what they are doing, who has an impeccable track record and training. Got to a research hospital, a university, somewhere where they know what they are doing. Don't accept the word of every Tom, Dick & Harry evaluator -- because they might not have any idea what they are doing. Hint: If they don't know what a differential diagnosis is, they have no business diagnosing anybody with anything. |
This isn't true. Labels drive services much too often in schools, even though they aren't supposed to. |
Yep. Worst decision ever. |
I would worry more about the kid's grades, SAT scores, etc rather than their educational label in regards to their future college admissions and careers. |
Not in our experience and I have a kid with ASD/ADHD. Not sure how a label would drive services since all services/supports has to be agreed on by the IEP team. |
if you could be any less patronizing... |
Yep. It makes the word totally meaningless. Also, it means that some people with HFA are under-estimated because people assume, when they hear the diagnosis, that they have "classic autism," or it means that kids with lower-functioning autism aren't given the support they need (see, e.g., the controversy about autism speaks). |
I agree with this. I spoke with a researcher who said even government-funded clinical studies were starting to be skewed, because there's a tendency to only want to research HFA. Sorry it's been a rough day! |