Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why do these girls engage in binge drinking, put themselves in compromising positions and then express outrage over a college adjuducation when they themselves don't even recall what they may have done while inebriated?
If you walk around wearing expensive jewelry in a high crime area, and someone steps up to you, knocks you over the head and robs you, you are indeed stupid, and you probably won't recall what happened to you. It doesn't make the robbery any less of a crime.
If you are drunk and give the expensive jewelry to a homeless person because you feel bad for him in your drunk state and the next morning you don't remember it ... that does not mean the homeless person stole from you.
You clearly don't know the law vis a vis rape. The law requires consent and consent cannot be given in an intoxicated state. I really hope you are 14 or 15 years old. That way your ignorance would at least be understandable. Men are going to have to figure out some way to control their violent tendencies while drunk. If they can't, maybe a law should be passed requiring them to take impotence-inducing drugs. Predators shouldn't be given passes to continue terrorizing others. The possibility of this consequence to misbehavior might just reveal that men have more control then they think or let on.
I actually do know the law quite well.
You can give consent if you are intoxicated... I do it all the time... I plan to do it tonight.
There is a whole world between legally intoxicated and passed out cold.
Having sex while drunk is not against the law. Many girls do consent when drunk and forget they consented and "take it back".
The real possibility (not in the Hobart case but many others) is that women have more control than they think or let on. Just because you regret it does not mean it was not consensual. You can't say women cant consent when drunk but men can.