Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
| Blah to 16:26. I'm 5'1 and weigh WAY TOO MUCH at 135. If I could get back to 104, I'd be really happy. But, we're trying to have another kid and I can't help but think it'd be wasted effort to kill myself to lose the weight now. Not a healthy attitude but that dessert I had for lunch at Ceiba's wasn't exactly healthy either. |
|
120, one month after DS was born. Used to weigh 100 before DD, who is now 2.5.
I'm only 5'1 so an extra 20 is a lot on my frame. Will work hard to get back to about 105. |
| Why are we adding in the number of kids we have and their ages? |
| 6'0" and 185 lbs, age 48, two kids with the youngest being 7 years old |
|
5'4" and normally 135 and toned. I've been a regular worker-outer for about a decade (weighed 155 for years, then decided to try working out for a year, without looking at the scale. I lost all 20 lbs that year and then just maintained it off via exercise, because I love to eat!).
THAT SAID, I'm 160 now...because I'm in my third trimester I have not been able to really exercise beyond walking because of nausea/fatigue/round ligament pain, so I feel pretty down on myself. However, I know I'm still eating healthy enough for the baby, and I hope my pathetic walking is helping keep baby healthy while mom takes a break for another 2 months!
|
| 5'6" 128 lbs. Pre baby (one child) I was 115-120. Went up to 183 with the pregnancy and had to actively lose 45 lbs. Hard! But got it done in a year. |
WOW! You are such an asshole. Health isn't just about weight. Diet, cholesterol, blood pressure, and cardiovascular fitness are far more important. |
5'2", 116. same weight as before my baby (now 1 year) but a lot flabbier. and my boobs disappeared .
|
I totally believe this is possible, people just hold weight differently based on frame size, too. I'm 5'9 and look "fat" at 135lb, which I was got up to right before DD#1 was born. I'm back to 125lb now which is a much better weight for me. I just have a TINY frame that can't hold extra. And congrats on the 50lb weight loss! I sometimes envy the curvy figure- mine is straight up and down like a teenage boy. If I gain weight, I am just a wider version of myself (doesn't go to boobs or butt, sadly- just everywhere). BUT, I can go braless (a 32A) and don't worry about gaping in button-down shirts, so I've got that going for me. |
| 5'7" and 127# trying to get toned with the f**king hard PX90 and that maniac Tony Horton screaming at me |
| 5'2 and 126.....I'm 5 months post-partum and would like to lose about 10-15 pounds.....I have a small frame but am super bootylicious and now have a pooch where the post-pregnancy pounds reside. |
this is definitely true. I'm 5'6" and have wide shoulders and hips. There's nothing delicate about my bone structure. At any less than about 125 and a size 6 I am down right gaunt. I was 120 once and I hate looking at pictures from that time because I look unhealthy and anorexic. |
|
^^
I agree. I'm 5'5 133 and people think I look anorexic if I drop below 130 |
|
I don't even know anymore. I'm guessing around 130 - hopefully not more then that but I've stopped running (trying to get back into it...) so it's possible.
A good weight for me is 115-120 (at that weight, people were saying I looked like I weighed 100-105). And I'm about 5 feet even. |
| 5'4" and 128. Trying desperately to get back to 120, which would be about 4-5 pounds lower than were I was when I got pregnant with my first (I have two kids. The youngest is 5). In my dream world, I'd be 115 and fit. I don't think my mid-40s metabolism is going to let me get there, at least on the weight front. I have been as low as 108 in the last three or so years, but somehow the 40s kicked in with a vengeance, so I don't think I'll see that number ever again. Sigh. |