WTAF is up with Sentebale's latest lawsuit against Prince Harry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

There was already an investigation done by the charitable commission on a lot of the underlying issues that are the basis of her claims. Seems unlikely that Sophie has some bombshell information that she chose not to share in that proceeding. And M isn’t involved with this charity so there’s not going to be anything about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

[Anonymous]

In Diana’s hay day she was always the saint who can do no wrong, and now Harry is the constant villain and scape goat.

I don’t believe that either narrative is true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In Diana’s hay day she was always the saint who can do no wrong, and now Harry is the constant villain and scape goat.

I don’t believe that either narrative is true

You’re wise not to believe everything you read.

When Diana was alive the press crucified her. One of them ran a piece about “sex-crazed Diana” the day she died and had to apologize for it. She was only canonized after her death. Don’t under-estimate the control the palaces have over the UK press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to know who's paying for her lawsuit. She says she has an outside donor, which is weird already, but also, shouldn't the money be going to sick children for the charity's mission, instead?

Probably William wearing a fake mustache.

This is a bogus lawsuit. And William won't be involved. It's going to be someone she knows, not the RF.

She knows William, they met at some Earthshot thing. And William's friend Iain Rawlinson is one of her two remaining trustees.

I don't doubt that they've met but I think it's funded by someone closer to her. Why would he fund a lawsuit like this with all the scandal the family is currently riding out? I think people have very vivid imaginations when it comes to this brotherly feud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to know who's paying for her lawsuit. She says she has an outside donor, which is weird already, but also, shouldn't the money be going to sick children for the charity's mission, instead?

Probably William wearing a fake mustache.

This is a bogus lawsuit. And William won't be involved. It's going to be someone she knows, not the RF.

She knows William, they met at some Earthshot thing. And William's friend Iain Rawlinson is one of her two remaining trustees.

I don't doubt that they've met but I think it's funded by someone closer to her. Why would he fund a lawsuit like this with all the scandal the family is currently riding out? I think people have very vivid imaginations when it comes to this brotherly feud.

You could be right. Or maybe whoever's funding it is doing it with William's OK, whether tacit or explicit. I'd bet equally on the tabloids. If we knew who was financing Meghan's sister, Samantha's nuisance lawsuits, which were also thrown out, we might have a good idea who's behind this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to know who's paying for her lawsuit. She says she has an outside donor, which is weird already, but also, shouldn't the money be going to sick children for the charity's mission, instead?

Probably William wearing a fake mustache.

This is a bogus lawsuit. And William won't be involved. It's going to be someone she knows, not the RF.

She knows William, they met at some Earthshot thing. And William's friend Iain Rawlinson is one of her two remaining trustees.

I don't doubt that they've met but I think it's funded by someone closer to her. Why would he fund a lawsuit like this with all the scandal the family is currently riding out? I think people have very vivid imaginations when it comes to this brotherly feud.

DP. I don’t think she’s from a background where she has a ton of people “close to her” with the kind of money necessary to fund this type of litigation. Also curious that she’s not suing the other prince that was also a founder of Senteable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

OK, William's "friends" say that he's stripping titles.

William encouraged the media to tear into Harry and Meghan, to distract from Andrew and Rose Hanbury, and to counter how threatened the Waleses felt after disastrous Caribbean tour, when the Sussexes had great tours to Africa and Australia.

All Harry did was tell his side of the story in Spare. All Harry did was explain what happened, what the media did to him and to Meghan, how Meghan was driven to consider suicide. And how the palaces did absolutely nothing to counter the ugly lies about Meghan, even as they were fighting tooth and nail to kill the rumors about William's affair with Rose Hanbury. See, for example, Kate's story that Meghan bullied her about bridesmaid's dresses, when in fact it was Kate bullying Meghan and KAte brought an apology note the next day--Harry set that story (among others) straight in Spare.

I'll never understand why it's OK for William to bully Harry, but it's not OK for Harry to tell his side of the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

There was already an investigation done by the charitable commission on a lot of the underlying issues that are the basis of her claims. Seems unlikely that Sophie has some bombshell information that she chose not to share in that proceeding. And M isn’t involved with this charity so there’s not going to be anything about her.

I think there was an incident involving m where it brought bad publicity to a charity event because m showed up and did something.
History now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to know who's paying for her lawsuit. She says she has an outside donor, which is weird already, but also, shouldn't the money be going to sick children for the charity's mission, instead?

Probably William wearing a fake mustache.

This is a bogus lawsuit. And William won't be involved. It's going to be someone she knows, not the RF.

She knows William, they met at some Earthshot thing. And William's friend Iain Rawlinson is one of her two remaining trustees.

I don't doubt that they've met but I think it's funded by someone closer to her. Why would he fund a lawsuit like this with all the scandal the family is currently riding out? I think people have very vivid imaginations when it comes to this brotherly feud.

DP. I don’t think she’s from a background where she has a ton of people “close to her” with the kind of money necessary to fund this type of litigation. Also curious that she’s not suing the other prince that was also a founder of Senteable.

Exactly. And also, all the trustees resigned and cosigned that terrible letter about her, and some of the trustees have said even worse things about her, but she's only suing former trustee Mark Dyer? A guy who's battling cancer, btw. Perhaps a clue lies in the fact that Charles hired Dyer after Diana's death to mentor both William and Harry, but Dyer is clearly Team Harry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

There was already an investigation done by the charitable commission on a lot of the underlying issues that are the basis of her claims. Seems unlikely that Sophie has some bombshell information that she chose not to share in that proceeding. And M isn’t involved with this charity so there’s not going to be anything about her.

I think there was an incident involving m where it brought bad publicity to a charity event because m showed up and did something.
History now.

You mean when Meghan brought her friend Serena Williams to a charity polo game, and Sophie was outraged? I mean, what charity head, ever, got upset about a really famous person attending their event, and bringing massive additional publicity to it and probably a big donation to her charity?

Sophie was looking for things to drag Meghan into. It's not Meghan's passion project.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts. [/quote]

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK. [/quote]

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.[/quote]
Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there. [/quote]

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material. [/quote]

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal. [/quote]

OK, William's "friends" say that he's stripping titles.

William encouraged the media to tear into Harry and Meghan, to distract from Andrew and Rose Hanbury, and to counter how threatened the Waleses felt after disastrous Caribbean tour, when the Sussexes had great tours to Africa and Australia.

All Harry did was tell his side of the story in Spare. All Harry did was explain what happened, what the media did to him and to Meghan, how Meghan was driven to consider suicide. And how the palaces did absolutely nothing to counter the ugly lies about Meghan, even as they were fighting tooth and nail to kill the rumors about William's affair with Rose Hanbury. See, for example, Kate's story that Meghan bullied her about bridesmaid's dresses, when in fact it was Kate bullying Meghan and KAte brought an apology note the next day--Harry set that story (among others) straight in Spare.

I'll never understand why it's OK for William to bully Harry, but it's not OK for Harry to tell his side of the story.[/quote]

Harry has certainly told his side of the story to Oprah, in spare, and the world.
What you wrote about William is gossip.
What you write about m is not necessarily true.
Recollections may vary. Like it or not, there is a lot of fake news out there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about h & m.
We really don’t have the facts.

I hope it goes to court, so the truth comes out about William's role.

We have some facts, and they all point to William. We have the fact that Willy "Africa is mine, Harold!" buddy Iain Rawlinson serves as one of Sophie C's remaining two trustees, and Rawlinson sat by Sophie's side during her barnstorming tour of the UK where she trashed Harry on every show that would have her. Rawlinson still hasn't resigned despite the travesty that is this nuisance lawsuit, which doesn't use new donor funds for sick children. We have the fact that this lawsuit just names Harry and former trustee Mark Dyer, when a total of 6 trustees put their names to that resignation letter that trashed Sophie. We have the trustees' resignation letter, which speaks volumes about Sophie C's hostile takeover. We have pictures of Sophie and William chatting at William's Earthshot.

Discovery will tell us who is the mysterious donor that's filing this nuisance lawsuit. My money's on William. Or maybe it's the tabloids, who wouldn't do it without William's OK.

The fixation by the megan and harry super fangirls on William is so strange.

Every article about William is about how much he hates Harry and can’t wait to strip his titles when he’s king. There’s no more there, there.

+1. This is what I don’t get. Every article about William is about how, when he’s king, he won’t cut ribbons and his first act will be to strip Harry’s titles. That’s it. Hardly seems like king material.

Reporting from gossip mags makes him unkingly? He hasn’t stated he is striping titles, Charles hasn’t. His brother sold him out in spare - sharing private details from behind closed doors of both him and his wife, having his mouthpiece omid scoby insinuate that his wife and father are racist. I can fully understand why he has cut Harry off. What retaliation has William actually done to Harry? Nothing, he just won’t speak to him after the betrayal.

What makes him unkingly is his laziness. He's on another 3 1/2 week vacation as we speak, and this is his 3rd or 4th vacation this year. When he is "working," it's about once a week, and usually involves something dumb like barista cosplay, where he's rude to Kate, at some place that already has plenty of business. Also he flies celebs into his Earthshot event (btw an Epstein buddy was a major early backer), so he can do photo ops with them. And let's not start on him and Kate grabbing their 4th or 5th "forever home" last year, and kicking out a children's museum and dogwalkers.

I say all this as someone who wants the monarchy to succeed. Maybe in reduced form, give back some of those palaces, reform the duchy scams. As a 1/2 Brit, I do think it serves a purpose for national identity, fun etc. But William and Kate have really got to step it up if the monarchy is to survive, because the younger generation doesn't relate to the Waleses at all according to polls. You can tell the UK press is worried, too.