WTAF is up with Sentebale's latest lawsuit against Prince Harry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most people are not in the weeds on this issue. Most people also don't care about the RF, including the Sussexes. I doubt this story will impact the trip to Australia and the women's retreat. I'm sure the Sussexes will get whatever coverage they are seeking.

yup. the audience for this post is so small. I sort of am interested in the royals and I cant be bothered to figure out this lawsuit. sort of like the blake lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people are not in the weeds on this issue. Most people also don't care about the RF, including the Sussexes. I doubt this story will impact the trip to Australia and the women's retreat. I'm sure the Sussexes will get whatever coverage they are seeking.

yup. the audience for this post is so small. I sort of am interested in the royals and I cant be bothered to figure out this lawsuit. sort of like the blake lawsuit.

So don't bother with the thread? Let the rest of us have our fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people are not in the weeds on this issue. Most people also don't care about the RF, including the Sussexes. I doubt this story will impact the trip to Australia and the women's retreat. I'm sure the Sussexes will get whatever coverage they are seeking.

yup. the audience for this post is so small. I sort of am interested in the royals and I cant be bothered to figure out this lawsuit. sort of like the blake lawsuit.

So don't bother with the thread? Let the rest of us have our fun.

If you only want the people who care about the lawsuit posting, there's going to be maybe 2 of you.

I totally agree it's like the Blake lawsuit thing btw. Who could be bothered to follow that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people are not in the weeds on this issue. Most people also don't care about the RF, including the Sussexes. I doubt this story will impact the trip to Australia and the women's retreat. I'm sure the Sussexes will get whatever coverage they are seeking.

yup. the audience for this post is so small. I sort of am interested in the royals and I cant be bothered to figure out this lawsuit. sort of like the blake lawsuit.

So don't bother with the thread? Let the rest of us have our fun.

If you only want the people who care about the lawsuit posting, there's going to be maybe 2 of you.

I totally agree it's like the Blake lawsuit thing btw. Who could be bothered to follow that?

I can't be bothered with the Blake Lively thread but I do follow this thread. To each their own, you know? What's really weird is you saying "you shouldn't be interested because I'm not interested." I mean this in the best possible way: suck it, then go find yourself a thread where you feel all cozy and at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FWIW, The Times just published the resignation letter signed by all 7 of Sentebale's former trustees in 2024. The trustees' resignation letter accused Chandauka of misconduct, intimidation, and risking the charity’s future.

https://archive.ph/PM2Yp

(Clarification- the charity's patrons Harry and Seeiso resigned in a separate move, but in concert with the trustees.)

This really can't be turning out like Sophie expected. She must have thought nobody would question where a penniless charity found the money to sue a prince, but The Times and other outlets went straight there. Then this letter, which had previously been kept quiet, gets released and it really puts her in a bad light.

If she were smart, she'd resign and withdraw the lawsuit before things get any worse. Discovery into her finances, including who is funding this lawsuit, is going to be absolutely brutal. But she seems pretty pigheaded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people are not in the weeds on this issue. Most people also don't care about the RF, including the Sussexes. I doubt this story will impact the trip to Australia and the women's retreat. I'm sure the Sussexes will get whatever coverage they are seeking.

yup. the audience for this post is so small. I sort of am interested in the royals and I cant be bothered to figure out this lawsuit. sort of like the blake lawsuit.

So don't bother with the thread? Let the rest of us have our fun.

If you only want the people who care about the lawsuit posting, there's going to be maybe 2 of you.

I totally agree it's like the Blake lawsuit thing btw. Who could be bothered to follow that?

I can't be bothered with the Blake Lively thread but I do follow this thread. To each their own, you know? What's really weird is you saying "you shouldn't be interested because I'm not interested." I mean this in the best possible way: suck it, then go find yourself a thread where you feel all cozy and at home.

You are way too invested in this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people are not in the weeds on this issue. Most people also don't care about the RF, including the Sussexes. I doubt this story will impact the trip to Australia and the women's retreat. I'm sure the Sussexes will get whatever coverage they are seeking.

yup. the audience for this post is so small. I sort of am interested in the royals and I cant be bothered to figure out this lawsuit. sort of like the blake lawsuit.

So don't bother with the thread? Let the rest of us have our fun.

If you only want the people who care about the lawsuit posting, there's going to be maybe 2 of you.

I totally agree it's like the Blake lawsuit thing btw. Who could be bothered to follow that?

I can't be bothered with the Blake Lively thread but I do follow this thread. To each their own, you know? What's really weird is you saying "you shouldn't be interested because I'm not interested." I mean this in the best possible way: suck it, then go find yourself a thread where you feel all cozy and at home.

You are way too invested in this.

You're the one who keeps coming back to tell us to stop being interested in this. Very weird.

[Anonymous]

Im shocked by how dark Meghan’s hair is now. She looks better with the warm sandyish hair. Dark like this is too contrasting. Plus her whole family has warm features.

[Anonymous]

Also it’s been more than 5 years. Why don’t people leave those two alone geez. They really aren’t bothering anybody

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people are not in the weeds on this issue. Most people also don't care about the RF, including the Sussexes. I doubt this story will impact the trip to Australia and the women's retreat. I'm sure the Sussexes will get whatever coverage they are seeking.

yup. the audience for this post is so small. I sort of am interested in the royals and I cant be bothered to figure out this lawsuit. sort of like the blake lawsuit.

So don't bother with the thread? Let the rest of us have our fun.

If you only want the people who care about the lawsuit posting, there's going to be maybe 2 of you.

I totally agree it's like the Blake lawsuit thing btw. Who could be bothered to follow that?

I can't be bothered with the Blake Lively thread but I do follow this thread. To each their own, you know? What's really weird is you saying "you shouldn't be interested because I'm not interested." I mean this in the best possible way: suck it, then go find yourself a thread where you feel all cozy and at home.

You are way too invested in this.

You're the one who keeps coming back to tell us to stop being interested in this. Very weird.

You should go to the women's retreat! It seems like it would be meaningful to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Im shocked by how dark Meghan’s hair is now. She looks better with the warm sandyish hair. Dark like this is too contrasting. Plus her whole family has warm features.

She needs to cut her hair. I'm not sure why she hasn't, frankly.

[Anonymous]

You can sue anyone for anything, fact.

She's nuts and is hoping for a settlement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A litigious guy has run afoul of another litigious person. Yawn.

I think this is basically what it is but it’s inappropriate for her to sue him under the name of the charity when it’s clearly based on a personal gripe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know I’ll get attacked for this, but…
Recollections may vary. I’m not sure we know the whole story, as we are strangers. But I hesitate to jump to conclusion that harry is blameless.
I thought there was lawsuit about a non disparagement clause that caused the Netflix guy to do a 360? But again, how are we to know. We aren’t, because we don’t have all the facts.
I don’t claim to know all sides of the story.

There was already an investigation of this whole debacle done by the charity commission.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is being reported on X that Harry tried to funnel donations to Sentable through Archewell, likely so he could skim off the top or something:

See new posts
Conversation
Mollie'sMama
@MolliesMama_
Harry wanted a large donation to Sentabale put thru Harry's Travelyst. Dr. Chandauka refused. Harry wanted to set up for all donations and grants recd by sent to Archewell Foundation. Dr. Sophie Chanduaka refused. Hence, Harry demanded that she step down as Chairperson for Sentebale. Dr. Chanduaka refused.


He and Meghan also messed up their huge fundraising event in Florida by forcing it to be filmed for their polo documentary, which resulted in Sentable having to spend money to change venues at the last minute as the original venue would not permit for-profit filming:

https://nypost.com/2025/10/06/entertainment/prince-harrys-former-charity-sentebale-drops-high-cost-polo-matches-from-its-fundraising-after-scandal/

She’s not a doctor and doesn’t have a doctorate so this source is already suss