i didn't have an applicant. It does feel like the overwhelming priorities are 1)poor 2) rural |
this has always been true, though. Early is for institutional priorities. Ivy roadmap and Admitium and Tineo talk about this. Your kid will do better in RD. Mine did. Deferred T10, in at Ivy in RD. Deferred T20, in at T10 in RD. |
Those are the #1 and #2 IPs of EVERY TOP SCHOOL. That's what the early pool is for. There was a great blog post on this. |
Princeton has been this way the past 4-5 years—-sticking to the DEI and first gen hard while they still have test optional. |
Lots of reasons. Major? Does he/she look like everyone else? What's different? What stands out? It can't be grades or scores. So, what else? |
So many kids have these same stats. Not unreal at all. |
Major? Start a new post with details and people will give suggestions on schools. I'd suggest professional review/help. Likely need to reframe all ECs. |
We had an admit from our private, already posted, in Maryland and not a legacy. |
+1. Two from DC private (not Sidwell/NCS/STA) |
3.98 UW/35 ACT |
| Two from SJC but both athletes. |
Lacrosse admit |
Those kinds of kids are fairly common, especially in top publics in this area, and simply do not represent an instititional priority. Major is important, though lots of kids game that now so not as helpful as it used to be. But admissions are really skewed toward FGLI and private feeders now. My 36 ACT 4.97w all 5s etc. decided Ivy admission was too much of a crap shoot, went WASP ED instead. |
Letters are probably ok. It was brutally hard and they deferred fewer. Know of stories from last year where kids like this went in to do well in RD. It sucks but don’t take it to heart. |
I suspect the no awards is an issue. Who gets into to Princeton without any awards? |