Kamala Harris - new post

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14, black leaders are no more special than leaders of any other color. Wake up, my friend.

Thats fine. Then don’t except show up and vote D. There was leakage in the last election.

Whatever. People will vote for the candidate they feel is best. Most of us don't vote based on the color of someone's skin.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14, black leaders are no more special than leaders of any other color. Wake up, my friend.

Thats fine. Then don’t except show up and vote D. There was leakage in the last election.

Whatever. People will vote for the candidate they feel is best. Most of us don't vote based on the color of someone's skin.
DP

It’s all good. The D party has been ignoring loyal black voters for decades, and you right, it’s over.

[Anonymous]

***troll***

[Anonymous]

The racist poster is living in the 50’s.
Time to move on!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14, black leaders are no more special than leaders of any other color. Wake up, my friend.

Thats fine. Then don’t except show up and vote D. There was leakage in the last election.

Whatever. People will vote for the candidate they feel is best. Most of us don't vote based on the color of someone's skin.
DP

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Of course she is qualified, but in modern times, you don't get a second bite at the apple.Once you have lost a national election, it's hard to come back. Unless you have a cult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14, black leaders are no more special than leaders of any other color. Wake up, my friend.

Thats fine. Then don’t except show up and vote D. There was leakage in the last election.

Whatever. People will vote for the candidate they feel is best. Most of us don't vote based on the color of someone's skin.
DP

It’s all good. The D party has been ignoring loyal black voters for decades, and you right, it’s over.

Go be racist somewhere else. The color of your skin does not interest me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:16:14, black leaders are no more special than leaders of any other color. Wake up, my friend.

Thats fine. Then don’t except show up and vote D. There was leakage in the last election.

Whatever. People will vote for the candidate they feel is best. Most of us don't vote based on the color of someone's skin.
DP

It’s all good. The D party has been ignoring loyal black voters for decades, and you right, it’s over.

Go be racist somewhere else. The color of your skin does not interest me.

+1

DP here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From my friend who worked in the WH, she’s a very nasty person.

I mean Clinton was a sexual predator.

[Anonymous]

I like Kamala a lot. But, I think her issue was that she didn’t break from Biden (who had no problem throwing her under the bus as “border czar”)

I think if she runs on a platform she truly believes she’d be great.

I do worry she is too tied to donor money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of us are done with AIPAC candidates so unless she breaks free, then I wouldn’t vote for her.

I gave this more thought, and I honestly think Kamala Harris is uniquely positioned to challenge the status quo—AIPAC included—if she chooses to. She’s no longer confined to the optics and expectations of a sitting VP, and with her upcoming book, she has the perfect platform to spark a deeper conversation about political realignment inside the Democratic Party.

What makes this interesting isn’t just policy—it’s public sentiment. If you look at what’s happening on TikTok, the groundswell is real. Gen Z is out here calling her “Big Sister General,” “Mamala,” and begging her to “take all my money.” The vibe isn’t forced—it’s grassroots and deeply emotional. Comments like “Come back, the babysitter is leading us down a dark path” and “She’s coming to save us, take my moneyyyy” are getting thousands of likes. And that’s not even from campaign material—that’s just from her showing up in a bookstore.

So while yes, AIPAC is a serious consideration—and many of us want to see our candidates distance themselves—Kamala might be one of the few figures with the visibility, legal sharpness, and cultural capital to walk that line and actually move the needle.

The question is: can she pull it off without the party machine undermining her? Or are we expecting one woman to fix what an entire party refuses to reckon with?

Either way, people are listening. And hoping.

🇺🇸

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of us are done with AIPAC candidates so unless she breaks free, then I wouldn’t vote for her.

I gave this more thought, and I honestly think Kamala Harris is uniquely positioned to challenge the status quo—AIPAC included—if she chooses to. She’s no longer confined to the optics and expectations of a sitting VP, and with her upcoming book, she has the perfect platform to spark a deeper conversation about political realignment inside the Democratic Party.

What makes this interesting isn’t just policy—it’s public sentiment. If you look at what’s happening on TikTok, the groundswell is real. Gen Z is out here calling her “Big Sister General,” “Mamala,” and begging her to “take all my money.” The vibe isn’t forced—it’s grassroots and deeply emotional. Comments like “Come back, the babysitter is leading us down a dark path” and “She’s coming to save us, take my moneyyyy” are getting thousands of likes. And that’s not even from campaign material—that’s just from her showing up in a bookstore.

So while yes, AIPAC is a serious consideration—and many of us want to see our candidates distance themselves—Kamala might be one of the few figures with the visibility, legal sharpness, and cultural capital to walk that line and actually move the needle.

The question is: can she pull it off without the party machine undermining her? Or are we expecting one woman to fix what an entire party refuses to reckon with?

Either way, people are listening. And hoping.

🇺🇸

Sounds like you are attributing to her and her book, everything you want, with no reason to actually think this will happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of us are done with AIPAC candidates so unless she breaks free, then I wouldn’t vote for her.

I gave this more thought, and I honestly think Kamala Harris is uniquely positioned to challenge the status quo—AIPAC included—if she chooses to. She’s no longer confined to the optics and expectations of a sitting VP, and with her upcoming book, she has the perfect platform to spark a deeper conversation about political realignment inside the Democratic Party.

What makes this interesting isn’t just policy—it’s public sentiment. If you look at what’s happening on TikTok, the groundswell is real. Gen Z is out here calling her “Big Sister General,” “Mamala,” and begging her to “take all my money.” The vibe isn’t forced—it’s grassroots and deeply emotional. Comments like “Come back, the babysitter is leading us down a dark path” and “She’s coming to save us, take my moneyyyy” are getting thousands of likes. And that’s not even from campaign material—that’s just from her showing up in a bookstore.

So while yes, AIPAC is a serious consideration—and many of us want to see our candidates distance themselves—Kamala might be one of the few figures with the visibility, legal sharpness, and cultural capital to walk that line and actually move the needle.

The question is: can she pull it off without the party machine undermining her? Or are we expecting one woman to fix what an entire party refuses to reckon with?

Either way, people are listening. And hoping.

🇺🇸

You need to get out more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course she is qualified, but in modern times, you don't get a second bite at the apple.Once you have lost a national election, it's hard to come back. Unless you have a cult.

No VP of Trump or Biden will ever be POTUS. Common sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of us are done with AIPAC candidates so unless she breaks free, then I wouldn’t vote for her.

I gave this more thought, and I honestly think Kamala Harris is uniquely positioned to challenge the status quo—AIPAC included—if she chooses to. She’s no longer confined to the optics and expectations of a sitting VP, and with her upcoming book, she has the perfect platform to spark a deeper conversation about political realignment inside the Democratic Party.

What makes this interesting isn’t just policy—it’s public sentiment. If you look at what’s happening on TikTok, the groundswell is real. Gen Z is out here calling her “Big Sister General,” “Mamala,” and begging her to “take all my money.” The vibe isn’t forced—it’s grassroots and deeply emotional. Comments like “Come back, the babysitter is leading us down a dark path” and “She’s coming to save us, take my moneyyyy” are getting thousands of likes. And that’s not even from campaign material—that’s just from her showing up in a bookstore.

So while yes, AIPAC is a serious consideration—and many of us want to see our candidates distance themselves—Kamala might be one of the few figures with the visibility, legal sharpness, and cultural capital to walk that line and actually move the needle.

The question is: can she pull it off without the party machine undermining her? Or are we expecting one woman to fix what an entire party refuses to reckon with?

Either way, people are listening. And hoping.

🇺🇸

You need to get out more.

I’m on vacation 🤭