Bernie Torches Democratic Party

[Anonymous]

JD Vance, who grew up in poverty and had a heroin addicted mother who abandoned him, is going to be the nominee in 2028. Sean O’Brein, the Teamsters president, sings his praises and says he’s the only Republican he really trusts on Union issues.

You Dems better not run Mayor Pete or Gavin Newsom against this guy and hope to have a prayer in the Blue Wall or in NC or Georgia. If Vance picks a woman as a running mate he might pick up way more electoral votes than Trump.

Choose wisely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance, who grew up in poverty and had a heroin addicted mother who abandoned him, is going to be the nominee in 2028. Sean O’Brein, the Teamsters president, sings his praises and says he’s the only Republican he really trusts on Union issues.

You Dems better not run Mayor Pete or Gavin Newsom against this guy and hope to have a prayer in the Blue Wall or in NC or Georgia. If Vance picks a woman as a running mate he might pick up way more electoral votes than Trump.

Choose wisely.

Have you been invited to the White House yet? Better work on that instead of worrying about the Democratic Party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:…”Latino men…woman hating…”

If you knew any Latino men other than stereotypes, you would know that many are devout Catholics with strong love for their family. They are some of the hardest working people in America.

I'm sure this is true, but they still won't vote female or gay.

Devout Catholics, as well as devout Protestants, cannot with good conscience vote for what God calls an abomination.

No surprise then atheists, communists, abortionists, and LGBT-blah-blah-blah overwhelmingly have their home in the D party.

Democrats keep trying to say Kamala lost because she is a woman. If a man had ran such a pathetic and uninspiring campaign, such as Romney and McCain did back in the day, he would have lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And he’s 100% right. But the rich, white elitists inside the Beltway will ignore him and continue losing national elections and run someone like Gavin Newsom or Mayor Pete in 2028.

How? Did you listen to Harris' campaign speeches? I thought it was pretty focused on improving the working/middle class issues. What do you think she should have said more?

You're absolutely right that she did address the middle class/working class; however, she didn't really offer a comprehensive, coordinated policy. Specifically, she never talked about the economy holistically--it was a bunch of sound bites for specific interest groups. The problem is that Democrats are beholden to rich funders, so they are never able to articulate an economic policy that makes sense for middle class and working class families, because those policies work against the rich.

What? What cohesive policy did Republicans put forward. High tariffs? Which every economist and even company execs said out loud yeah we would pass that cost onto the consumer. Redoing healthcare? With what we don’t know but that sure have been talking about it for 16 years. Not to mention the 40years before that were prices just keep rising with nothing done. Rich funders? Elon Musk was handing out million dollar checks at rallies but sure Republicans aren’t beholden to rich funders. He was just doing that out of the kindness of his heart.

The problem isn’t that Democrats talk in soundbytes. The problem is that many American people only listen to sound bites instead of listening to substantive policy discussion and doing research.

Hell last time Donald Trump told folks he was going to save their jobs and their own union president told them that was a lie and they didn’t even believe him. What happened the ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And he’s 100% right. But the rich, white elitists inside the Beltway will ignore him and continue losing national elections and run someone like Gavin Newsom or Mayor Pete in 2028.

How? Did you listen to Harris' campaign speeches? I thought it was pretty focused on improving the working/middle class issues. What do you think she should have said more?

You're absolutely right that she did address the middle class/working class; however, she didn't really offer a comprehensive, coordinated policy. Specifically, she never talked about the economy holistically--it was a bunch of sound bites for specific interest groups. The problem is that Democrats are beholden to rich funders, so they are never able to articulate an economic policy that makes sense for middle class and working class families, because those policies work against the rich.

What? What cohesive policy did Republicans put forward. High tariffs? Which every economist and even company execs said out loud yeah we would pass that cost onto the consumer. Redoing healthcare? With what we don’t know but that sure have been talking about it for 16 years. Not to mention the 40years before that were prices just keep rising with nothing done. Rich funders? Elon Musk was handing out million dollar checks at rallies but sure Republicans aren’t beholden to rich funders. He was just doing that out of the kindness of his heart.

The problem isn’t that Democrats talk in soundbytes. The problem is that many American people only listen to sound bites instead of listening to substantive policy discussion and doing research.

Hell last time Donald Trump told folks he was going to save their jobs and their own union president told them that was a lie and they didn’t even believe him. What happened the ?

Yes, discussion and research is why they don’t agree with you. Hahahahahaha

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance, who grew up in poverty and had a heroin addicted mother who abandoned him, is going to be the nominee in 2028. Sean O’Brein, the Teamsters president, sings his praises and says he’s the only Republican he really trusts on Union issues.

You Dems better not run Mayor Pete or Gavin Newsom against this guy and hope to have a prayer in the Blue Wall or in NC or Georgia. If Vance picks a woman as a running mate he might pick up way more electoral votes than Trump.

Choose wisely.

Pete would chew Vance up and spit him out. JDs got no game. He’ll be forever chained to Trump, who he described as:
Idiot
Reprehensible
Hitler
Cynical azzhole

[Anonymous]

How does deporting legal immigrants and implementing tariffs help the working class?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:…”Latino men…woman hating…”

If you knew any Latino men other than stereotypes, you would know that many are devout Catholics with strong love for their family. They are some of the hardest working people in America.

I'm sure this is true, but they still won't vote female or gay.

Devout Catholics, as well as devout Protestants, cannot with good conscience vote for what God calls an abomination.

No surprise then atheists, communists, abortionists, and LGBT-blah-blah-blah overwhelmingly have their home in the D party.

Democrats keep trying to say Kamala lost because she is a woman. If a man had ran such a pathetic and uninspiring campaign, such as Romney and McCain did back in the day, he would have lost.

Yet somehow they keep making a way for Judas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And he’s 100% right. But the rich, white elitists inside the Beltway will ignore him and continue losing national elections and run someone like Gavin Newsom or Mayor Pete in 2028.

How? Did you listen to Harris' campaign speeches? I thought it was pretty focused on improving the working/middle class issues. What do you think she should have said more?

You're absolutely right that she did address the middle class/working class; however, she didn't really offer a comprehensive, coordinated policy. Specifically, she never talked about the economy holistically--it was a bunch of sound bites for specific interest groups. The problem is that Democrats are beholden to rich funders, so they are never able to articulate an economic policy that makes sense for middle class and working class families, because those policies work against the rich.

What? What cohesive policy did Republicans put forward. High tariffs? Which every economist and even company execs said out loud yeah we would pass that cost onto the consumer. Redoing healthcare? With what we don’t know but that sure have been talking about it for 16 years. Not to mention the 40years before that were prices just keep rising with nothing done. Rich funders? Elon Musk was handing out million dollar checks at rallies but sure Republicans aren’t beholden to rich funders. He was just doing that out of the kindness of his heart.

The problem isn’t that Democrats talk in soundbytes. The problem is that many American people only listen to sound bites instead of listening to substantive policy discussion and doing research.

Hell last time Donald Trump told folks he was going to save their jobs and their own union president told them that was a lie and they didn’t even believe him. What happened the ?

Yes, discussion and research is why they don’t agree with you. Hahahahahaha

Then tell us oh wise one why they don’t agree.

Energy? Because yes Trump is somehow going to lower gas prices. Prices that are already dropping.

Middle Class jobs? Doing what exactly… working on the smaller farm that are being gobbled up by larger ones. Working in automobile plants that they won’t accept have moved to Hybrid and EV technology. Forcing folks back into the office full time increasing the amount of money they spend in childcare and commuting cost.

Oh I know tax breaks because then corporation will raise wages. Yet for some reason wages still don’t keep pace with rising cost of goods and inflation despite companies already getting tax breaks.

No wait, he’s going to tackle Healthcare with the concept of a plan that been in work by his party for how many years now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance, who grew up in poverty and had a heroin addicted mother who abandoned him, is going to be the nominee in 2028. Sean O’Brein, the Teamsters president, sings his praises and says he’s the only Republican he really trusts on Union issues.

You Dems better not run Mayor Pete or Gavin Newsom against this guy and hope to have a prayer in the Blue Wall or in NC or Georgia. If Vance picks a woman as a running mate he might pick up way more electoral votes than Trump.

Choose wisely.

Pete would chew Vance up and spit him out. JDs got no game. He’ll be forever chained to Trump, who he described as:
Idiot
Reprehensible
Hitler
Cynical azzhole

I’m sure working class men and Hispanic men are going to be lining up in droves to vote for Mayor Pete…

You do want to win the election, right? This isn’t a debate competition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:…”Latino men…woman hating…”

If you knew any Latino men other than stereotypes, you would know that many are devout Catholics with strong love for their family. They are some of the hardest working people in America.

I'm sure this is true, but they still won't vote female or gay.

Devout Catholics, as well as devout Protestants, cannot with good conscience vote for what God calls an abomination.

No surprise then atheists, communists, abortionists, and LGBT-blah-blah-blah overwhelmingly have their home in the D party.

Democrats keep trying to say Kamala lost because she is a woman. If a man had ran such a pathetic and uninspiring campaign, such as Romney and McCain did back in the day, he would have lost.

You want her to oral sex the mic too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How does deporting legal immigrants and implementing tariffs help the working class?

Policy does not matter, it is all about feelings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is such BS. Biden’s whole legislative agenda - IRA, infrastructure and CHIPS - was all about jobs for the working class without college degrees, and Americans haven’t realized that yet or don’t care. And the far left Bernie people have done almost nothing except complain about Gaza and support insane protests for the past year.

Have you ever actually tried to get money out of the CHIPS Act? All these people praising it don’t seem to have any actual experience with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:F Bernie. And I voted for him in the 2016 primaries. But I’ve come to see him for the grifter he is.

+1. Kamala scored more votes in Vermont than Bernie did, so perhaps Bernie needs to take a seat again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And he’s 100% right. But the rich, white elitists inside the Beltway will ignore him and continue losing national elections and run someone like Gavin Newsom or Mayor Pete in 2028.

How? Did you listen to Harris' campaign speeches? I thought it was pretty focused on improving the working/middle class issues. What do you think she should have said more?

You're absolutely right that she did address the middle class/working class; however, she didn't really offer a comprehensive, coordinated policy. Specifically, she never talked about the economy holistically--it was a bunch of sound bites for specific interest groups. The problem is that Democrats are beholden to rich funders, so they are never able to articulate an economic policy that makes sense for middle class and working class families, because those policies work against the rich.

What? What cohesive policy did Republicans put forward. High tariffs? Which every economist and even company execs said out loud yeah we would pass that cost onto the consumer. Redoing healthcare? With what we don’t know but that sure have been talking about it for 16 years. Not to mention the 40years before that were prices just keep rising with nothing done. Rich funders? Elon Musk was handing out million dollar checks at rallies but sure Republicans aren’t beholden to rich funders. He was just doing that out of the kindness of his heart.

The problem isn’t that Democrats talk in soundbytes. The problem is that many American people only listen to sound bites instead of listening to substantive policy discussion and doing research.

Hell last time Donald Trump told folks he was going to save their jobs and their own union president told them that was a lie and they didn’t even believe him. What happened the ?

Yes, discussion and research is why they don’t agree with you. Hahahahahaha

Then tell us oh wise one why they don’t agree.

Energy? Because yes Trump is somehow going to lower gas prices. Prices that are already dropping.

Middle Class jobs? Doing what exactly… working on the smaller farm that are being gobbled up by larger ones. Working in automobile plants that they won’t accept have moved to Hybrid and EV technology. Forcing folks back into the office full time increasing the amount of money they spend in childcare and commuting cost.

Oh I know tax breaks because then corporation will raise wages. Yet for some reason wages still don’t keep pace with rising cost of goods and inflation despite companies already getting tax breaks.

No wait, he’s going to tackle Healthcare with the concept of a plan that been in work by his party for how many years now?

You lost me at hybrids and EVs. Adoption of both has been so underwhelming that most auto manufacturers are pausing or scaling back.