Eh, my kids had plenty of advantages in life. If someone kid who didn’t have the resources and support my kids have gets a leg up, I’m ok with that. |
At all of the above schools, you indicate your intended major. (And it absolutely is a data point in your application, even though they might not "hold you to intended major.") |
Right in theory I feel the same way. But ever since I was a senior in high school and I didn't get into my dream School, but a rich, black, always -- joking around and taking away from the intellectual conversation in class--- student with much lower everything than me got in, I started to feel differently. He was a nice guy, had nothing against him personally, but to say he was more deserving of the opportunity than me was totally absurd. But, he checked a different box than me. I don't think that this is a fair thing at an institution receiving lots of federal funding. And apparently the supreme Court agrees with me. |
Look at it this way... that guy probably went on to engage and inspire more people than you would have after going to your dream school. And, yes, inspiring more people because of his culture and the color of his skin. It just works that way. We are not a culture-blind, color-blind world. |
Could anyone else in the room see this student? |
Where’s the data that supports this? |
Harvard lawsuit etc. you’re in denial. |
+1. Held that the Asians were discriminated against. |
I hope they learned to start a sentence without sounding drunk |
Except we kind of are - I know enough first generation American, parents were blue collar, first in their family to finish college types who don't look the part that the rest of society wants to naively pigeon hole them into "privileged" category. One can argue that given the criteria, this kind of applicant needs more assistance than some others. |
(ie: needs more assistance than a black or hispanic applicant whose parents are both college graduates, maybe live in a $1m+ home, and live in a high COL area). |
What's with the preferential treatment towards Hispanics, especially those that just landed or a gen or two ago from elsewhere? I look at the questions and go, WTF! |
The issue is that Asians (and whites) are not a minority, and should not form an argument on this topic, with that being the premise (real or implied). Asians (or whites) can attack the small subgroups (URM, legacy, whatever it is this week) In the 80's, if you were Asian applicant, it was much easier to be admitted to college in the U.S. - now, their arguments are not applicable. If white people, at the time, had said "fewer Asians should be admitted", thinking their seats were being taken by Asians, imagine how that would be received?! The minute you say "but we are more deserving", and you attack another group (real or implied) - which is seen on DCUM often, you lose the argument. |
I don't understand your question. Are you talking about immigrants whose parents had college degrees, or not. PP was talking about preference for those without college degrees. |
That is very different than applying to a major. |