Montgomery County has plenty of chain restaurants with their own large, no-pay parking lots, if that's what you're looking for. |
The only thing I want to hear from smart growthers in this thread is why smart growth hasn’t resulted in more revenue and lower costs like they promised. There’s no way we should need to raise taxes with all the smart growth that happened over the last two decades. |
Yeah, sure you did. You're paying an extra 4% there on your restaurant bill due to their higher restaurant sales tax. |
Np- I stopped as well. The restaurants are just not that good to deal with the parking. Bethesda is just like a mall, without being enclosed. DC is where you go for decent restaurants. |
I am a MoCo homeowner, an MCPS employee and a parent of two MCPS students. The ONLY way I support that increase is if there is some serious oversight on how that money is spent. If it’s actually 100 percent going to supporting teacher and support staff salaries to lower class sizes and make it easier for kids to get the help they need? Great! Want to spend it on breakfast and lunch for every kid? Also great in my book. Let’s raise school psychologist salaries too, so we have a chance to hire the mental health supports so many kids desperately need right now.
On the other hand, if one penny of that tax increase is going to yet another central office position, bullshit like Leader In Me, the absolutely atrocious online FEV Tutoring program? Then I am one hundred percent opposed. |
That's fine, and I agree with you that Bethesda restaurants are pretty mediocre and you'll find better options in DC (parking in DC is even worse than Bethesda, though). It just didn't make sense for the PP to act as though trekking out to Tysons was some sort of cost cutting measure because of the cost of Bethesda parking. |
That's because you're too stupid to have any reading comprehension. I said "parking hassle" not "parking fees" |
1. There will be no oversight because the council members are too busy with their side gigs. 2. School lunch and psychologists should be handled by HHS so that the funding doesn’t get rolled into the maintenance of effort requirements. 3. You better believe a lot of this money is going to central office and contractors. |
When I go to Bethesda Row, I just park at that surface lot on Leland and walk a block. I guess people don't know about that lot or are just don't want to walk a block? |
Do property tax increases still require the council's unanimous support, and is that likely? |
But doesn't this destroy Elrich's inflation argument? Assessments are going up 20-40%, which is way over the inflation rate, so that's going to provide the county with tons of new revenue. Why does the county need yet another 10% on top of that? |
Technically, no. The state overrode that, when they put in Maintenance of effort for schools. |
Every time they want to raise local taxes, they claim it's for schools, but that money ends up being used elsewhere. This is the oldest trick in local politics...6 |
The fraction of this increase that makes it back to MCPS will likely all go to various studies that will never be used for anything, more LIM training, and more Central Office administrative staff because that's where it always ends up. Nothing will improve unless they're forced to deal with their wasteful2 spending. They've made zero effort to combat these issues. Their solution is to pass the burden to the taxpayer. |
The thing is- Elrich can say this hike is directly for schools, and make it as such. But it frees up other money to be used elsewhere. I saw a tweet that literally every department is up between 5 and 11 %. |