MH370 New Netflix Special

[Anonymous]

The plane was shot down by the Chinese government. At the time the crash happened, the Uighur activists were actively doing things in parts of China, and there were a number of Uighur activists on board the plane. IDK if they planned to hijack the plane, but they were known for conducting machete attacks. The Chinese government was actively trying to cover up the Uighur massacres they themselves were conducting, as well as the Uighur resistance. The Chinese government shot down the plane because Uighir activists tried to hijack it and the Chinese government would rather shoot down a plane than have that sort of publicity.

[Anonymous]

The Chinese government shooting it down also explains why it's never really been found.

[Anonymous]

If it were shot down there wouldn’t be satellite pings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netflix has a history of making these documentaries with missing information. What time did the call come in from the daughter of the passenger? What did the cell phone data show? 200+ people on that plane where was the last place the phones towers pinged (someone had to have their phone on during the flight). The plane is in the ocean where the last phones pinged.

6+ countries don't have this plane on radar? 2 AWACS planes in the same area at the same time didn't capture any information about this plane? We have satellite that can read the time on your wrist watch yet no ONE, NO ONE has any data on the flight of this plane? Think logically. Something stinks here.

The US waits 2+ years to say the pilot had a similar route on his flight simulation software at home?

The fact that the pilot has to go underneath the plane to turn off visibility makes me think the suicide thing didn't happen. If he were trying to kill everyone he can wouldn't he crash into a population building or place on land not in the ocean?

China, Russia and the US know a lot more than they are saying.

I felt like this wasn't head-on addressed in the Netflix documentary. They seemed to kind of allude to it, talk about the electronics center in the belly of the plane, and then move on. So...could you turn off the signals from the cockpit or not?

Yes you can. They were just trying to show it didn't HAVE to be the pilot.

It was the pilot.

No you misunderstood, they covered this in the show you can only turn it off underneath not from the cockpit.

Who specifically is “they”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The plane was shot down by the Chinese government. At the time the crash happened, the Uighur activists were actively doing things in parts of China, and there were a number of Uighur activists on board the plane. IDK if they planned to hijack the plane, but they were known for conducting machete attacks. The Chinese government was actively trying to cover up the Uighur massacres they themselves were conducting, as well as the Uighur resistance. The Chinese government shot down the plane because Uighir activists tried to hijack it and the Chinese government would rather shoot down a plane than have that sort of publicity.

Hmmm. This is a anew theory. They could convince (coerce) Malyasia to alter the pilot's simulator data, which would explain why the US would be reluctant to release it.

That wouldn't explain Inmarsat's data. Not that I believe the data, at all, but what reason would they have to release it?

Shooting down, from anyone, also explains the lack of cell phone messages.

[Anonymous]

The theories are all too unlikely and unrepeated to be valid. All the other scenarios are the kind that lend themselves to a repeat action - being shot down, suicide, etc. If any of these were true , it would have happened before.

The most likely thing that happened is there was a known issue with the plane that they knew could cause an amazingly catastrophic incident but since it had not yet happened and they thought it was too rare to happen and it was too much trouble, they just didn't fix it or correct it. And that probably was true for many years. And then the worst happened, they realized that no one could ever find out or would know about the issue or could silence anyone who did, and that was that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you are piloting a plane and going to suicide and you want to take people with you, why wouldn't you fly it into a city or building?

I just can't imagine the pilot flying for 6 hours to down the plane in a suicide. Why wait that long?

I don't know, but he did "practice" the route on his at-home flight simulator. Perhaps it seemed poetic to him. Just fly until the fuel runs out, crash in an extremely remote area, never to be found. Mysterious and dramatic.

+1. Wanting to be part of a dramatic story that would live on.
Maybe he took off the mask. What would happen once fuel ran out? Drift down or spiral?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Chinese government shooting it down also explains why it's never really been found.

There is no way that it was shot down in the Gulf of Thailand/South China Sea area. There would be debris everywhere and that's exactly where they were first searching.

I don't understand the idea that the plane went into a pilot-induced dive at the end. Where did that come from? It seems much more likely to me that the pilot set the heading and took off his mask to end it, and then the plane flew Payne Stewart-style the rest of the way. It crashed into a deep ocean where nobody could realistically find it.

[Anonymous]

Ok don’t have time to read all the replies but my DC is obsessed with this - some of the theories sound cray cray/ Q Anon landesque to me.

what are the most realistic explanations for this plane disappearing? The other Air Malaysia flight disaster was most likely shot down by the Russians right? M
Tx for crash course in plausible explanations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else freaked out that it happened 9years ago? When I heard the ad and it said it happened nearly a decade ago, I thought it referred to another plane. Where does time go???

Man, I remember that time SO CLEARLY because CNN just completely jumped the shark and I had to break up with them, lol. They had models of the plane, they had a to-scale cockpit, they had pilots on every hour. It was like, "Why report on human rights in Myanmar or the civil war in Syria when we could keep repeating the same non-information over and over again?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to Netflix, the pilot was doing home flight simulations of this exact scenario, flying off course, and running out of fuel over the SCS. They didn't spend a lot of time on it, but seems like there's the story right there.

This isn't what the Netflix doc says. It is neither the exact scenario in terms of route nor was it a continuous flight that was simulated. The doc explains why it wasn't identical.

I don't know what happened and don't have a favored theory but the simulator data doesn't seem to be at all relevant. Rather it seems like those who favor "the pilot did it" theory have manipulated the interpretation of the simulator data to be helpful to that narrative but it doesn't really fit.

[Anonymous]

If the plane was shot down by anyone it would have been picked up on radar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Netflix, the pilot was doing home flight simulations of this exact scenario, flying off course, and running out of fuel over the SCS. They didn't spend a lot of time on it, but seems like there's the story right there.

This isn't what the Netflix doc says. It is neither the exact scenario in terms of route nor was it a continuous flight that was simulated. The doc explains why it wasn't identical.

I don't know what happened and don't have a favored theory but the simulator data doesn't seem to be at all relevant. Rather it seems like those who favor "the pilot did it" theory have manipulated the interpretation of the simulator data to be helpful to that narrative but it doesn't really fit.

Why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Chinese government shooting it down also explains why it's never really been found.

There is no way that it was shot down in the Gulf of Thailand/South China Sea area. There would be debris everywhere and that's exactly where they were first searching.

I don't understand the idea that the plane went into a pilot-induced dive at the end. Where did that come from? It seems much more likely to me that the pilot set the heading and took off his mask to end it, and then the plane flew Payne Stewart-style the rest of the way. It crashed into a deep ocean where nobody could realistically find it.

+1

And there wouldn't be the satellite pings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The US was not involved.

I don't believe Russia is involved, because it wouldn't be such a highly kept secret.

The access to the electronics room seemed far fetched.

Pilot intentionally doing this is the only thing that truly aligns with the evidence.

One of the few sane people posting on this thread.