two piece ok for girls?

[Anonymous]

Stop buying into the idea that clothes can "sexualize" little girls. CREEPY MEN are the only ones sexualizing little girls, and they will do it regardless of what that girl is wearing

[Anonymous]

Kids should be able to run around naked, honestly. But we are messed up as a society so we have to clothe them to protect them from perverts. I really don't see the difference between a two piece or a one piece on a child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People are talking about two different things here. A two piece as as a bottom and rash guard- this is standard for little boys and girls. A triangle top covering prepubescent nipples? Inappropriate, in my opinion. Topless would be better and with way less sexual implications.

Nobody is talking about triangle tops. The “bikini” tops for kids are cropped tankinis, the same shape as a sports bra.

Have you read every page in this thread? Lots of people are talking about triangle tops and saying there's nothing wrong with them.

I'm not sure how I feel about the fact that this is my reaction, but I know I cringe a little when I see little girls with tops on emulating a style that's designed to be sexually appealing on women. We can all agree that there's no practical reason to wear a top like that, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People are talking about two different things here. A two piece as as a bottom and rash guard- this is standard for little boys and girls. A triangle top covering prepubescent nipples? Inappropriate, in my opinion. Topless would be better and with way less sexual implications.

Nobody is talking about triangle tops. The “bikini” tops for kids are cropped tankinis, the same shape as a sports bra.

Have you read every page in this thread? Lots of people are talking about triangle tops and saying there's nothing wrong with them.

I'm not sure how I feel about the fact that this is my reaction, but I know I cringe a little when I see little girls with tops on emulating a style that's designed to be sexually appealing on women. We can all agree that there's no practical reason to wear a top like that, right?

Totally agree, I wish they could just wear the bottom, but unfortunately, in this country they can’t. In Europe, they are topless. Here, they were a small top… I don’t see it as sexy at all because 6 year olds are not sexy, but if you see it sexy… that is your issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kids have never worn one pieces, they are a pain in the butt to take off and put back on when the child has to pee. For the most part they wear tankinis, but sometimes the tops are cropped and you can see belly. I don't see anything wrong with that. I do think it's weird to put a proper bikini on a child who doesn't have breasts, but I just think it LOOKS weird especially because those tops shift around when there's nothing to hold them in place, and not that a child is being sexualized.

But the fact that you feel the need to cover her is sexualizing that part of her body.

No, it's adhering to societal norms because OTHER PEOPLE care about that stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People are talking about two different things here. A two piece as as a bottom and rash guard- this is standard for little boys and girls. A triangle top covering prepubescent nipples? Inappropriate, in my opinion. Topless would be better and with way less sexual implications.

Nobody is talking about triangle tops. The “bikini” tops for kids are cropped tankinis, the same shape as a sports bra.

Have you read every page in this thread? Lots of people are talking about triangle tops and saying there's nothing wrong with them.

I'm not sure how I feel about the fact that this is my reaction, but I know I cringe a little when I see little girls with tops on emulating a style that's designed to be sexually appealing on women. We can all agree that there's no practical reason to wear a top like that, right?

Please go back and quote the "lots of people" who are talking about triangle tops. PLEASE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

An 8 year old shouldn't be wearing a sports bra or a crop top.

Dude, an 8 year old is EXACTLY who should be wearing a crop top - who else has an adorable flat belly that they WANT to show off??? You sound insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ah my girls (6 and 8) have been wearing bikinis since forever.
I am European and DH is South American. I wonder what other people think about us when we go to public pools in DC with the girls in (tiny) bikinis and son in speedo 😊.

We buy swimsuit in Europe or Brazil because we hate the big swimsuits sold in the US.

I would think nothing. I'm from Southern California, this discussion is crazy to me. If she want a bikini let her wear it, as long as it stays on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:it's fine OP. Don't listen to the weirdos who think an 8yo is sexualized if her bathing suit shows her stomach

No, what's weird is 8 year olds in bikinis. THAT'S what's weird.

Tell me you worry about your husband looking at little girls without telling me you worry about your husband looking at little girls.

+1 I can’t think of any other reason a woman wouldn’t want to see a little girl in a belly-baring swimsuit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Come on people. She obviously means a bikini. Not rash guards and swim shorts.

OP, my daughter is 10 and finishing 4th grade. She and I both decided "not yet" this summer. For me, growing up, it was the summer I was 12, after 6th grade--6th grade was ES for me and is for my kids as well. I think 12 is probably where we will end up, too. I see tons of girls of all ages in bikinis though. I just think it looks silly--not trashy or anything.

Only a fool would put a female child under age 16 in a bikini.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on people. She obviously means a bikini. Not rash guards and swim shorts.

OP, my daughter is 10 and finishing 4th grade. She and I both decided "not yet" this summer. For me, growing up, it was the summer I was 12, after 6th grade--6th grade was ES for me and is for my kids as well. I think 12 is probably where we will end up, too. I see tons of girls of all ages in bikinis though. I just think it looks silly--not trashy or anything.

Only a fool would put a female child under age 16 in a bikini.

Since I am that fool, could you please explain why? I am not American and I don’t get it… also, I had never realized that little girls should not wear a bikini, but I did realize they need to cover their chest in the US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on people. She obviously means a bikini. Not rash guards and swim shorts.

OP, my daughter is 10 and finishing 4th grade. She and I both decided "not yet" this summer. For me, growing up, it was the summer I was 12, after 6th grade--6th grade was ES for me and is for my kids as well. I think 12 is probably where we will end up, too. I see tons of girls of all ages in bikinis though. I just think it looks silly--not trashy or anything.

Only a fool would put a female child under age 16 in a bikini.

What's magical about 16? Why are you so threatened by 8 year olds in their swimwear?

[Anonymous]

Y'all are messing up your kids. By making wearing a two piece bathing suit this big step towards adulthood, instead of just a practical piece of clothing, you are putting all these expectations and implications around it that it need not have. By saying "you can't wear a bikini until you are 16", you are essentially saying "at 16, you are officially sexually alluring, proceed accordingly." Like you are somehow associating wearing a bikini with having sex, when they are unrelated things.

People do this with makeup and earrings too. It's this idea that the only reason for women to wear jewelry, makeup, or certain clothing is to attract me who want to have sex with them. It's weird. Lots of women do all these things daily and it has ZERO to do with having sex. Also lots of people have sex who aren't wearing bikinis or earrings. You are messing up your kids by linking these things.

Recently my DD and I painted each others nails for fun, and she picked a bright red for her nails. When my mom saw it, she pulled me aside and said that while it's one thing for little girls to wear nail polish, it is "inappropriate" for her to wear red because it's "too sexy." Like with purple nail polish my DD is safe, but in red nail polish she will get sex trafficked.

This is what you all sound like. It is nonsensical and actually doing the opposite of what you claim to be doing. You aren't protecting girls, you are exposing them to sexual objectification that they will live with for the rest of their lives once you deem them old enough to "be sexy".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Y'all are messing up your kids. By making wearing a two piece bathing suit this big step towards adulthood, instead of just a practical piece of clothing, you are putting all these expectations and implications around it that it need not have. By saying "you can't wear a bikini until you are 16", you are essentially saying "at 16, you are officially sexually alluring, proceed accordingly." Like you are somehow associating wearing a bikini with having sex, when they are unrelated things.

People do this with makeup and earrings too. It's this idea that the only reason for women to wear jewelry, makeup, or certain clothing is to attract me who want to have sex with them. It's weird. Lots of women do all these things daily and it has ZERO to do with having sex. Also lots of people have sex who aren't wearing bikinis or earrings. You are messing up your kids by linking these things.

Recently my DD and I painted each others nails for fun, and she picked a bright red for her nails. When my mom saw it, she pulled me aside and said that while it's one thing for little girls to wear nail polish, it is "inappropriate" for her to wear red because it's "too sexy." Like with purple nail polish my DD is safe, but in red nail polish she will get sex trafficked.

This is what you all sound like. It is nonsensical and actually doing the opposite of what you claim to be doing. You aren't protecting girls, you are exposing them to sexual objectification that they will live with for the rest of their lives once you deem them old enough to "be sexy".

The girl who's told no bikini until 16 is absolutely going to have one and change as soon as she's out of her overbearing parents sight. Much like the girls who aren't supposed to wear makeup and put it on as soon as they are at school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People are talking about two different things here. A two piece as as a bottom and rash guard- this is standard for little boys and girls. A triangle top covering prepubescent nipples? Inappropriate, in my opinion. Topless would be better and with way less sexual implications.

Nobody is talking about triangle tops. The “bikini” tops for kids are cropped tankinis, the same shape as a sports bra.

Why are you covering little girls nipples and not the boys if not because they are sexualized. Doesn't matter if it is triangles or tankini.