the obsession with colleges

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


A certain subset of UMC America thinks it matters where you go to college, both career-wise and in finding the "right" spouse.

This is what drives 90% of college obsession.


lol. Where you go to college can matter. The right spouse also matters wherever that person comes from. The idea that it does not matter at all is kind of silly. If you go to an awful college of course you still have the chance to do whatever you want. You have less ways to do it though. You also have more road blocks and roundabouts. Less so from a top school. Of course you can still screw it up but more paths; less roadblocks. UMC parents think this because they see it every day


Right - but it’s not the end-all-be-all that a lot of folks here make it out to be. Unless you are going to a top-50 or bottom 1/3 school, I’d doesn’t really matter all that much - or matter as much as the time, effort, expense, etc. I equate it to the travel sports frenzy that starts at age 10.


There's a difference between Top 10 school and a Top 50


There's really not in terms of outcomes...

https://lesshighschoolstress.com/page/6/




Wow…you are lifting the veneer of many folks’ psyche here… does that mean if my goal is a top 25 and I spend all this money on private schools from 4th grade, it’s all for naught? In all seriousness, folks here don’t get that attending a public school actually demonstrates your well-roundedness and resiliency. And it showcases your ability to interact and form lasting relationships across all socio and economic groups. There is no more diverse atmosphere than MCPS, FCPS, and other systems. Inclusivity is a trait desired by many business leaders, and isolating yourself in the bubble of private schools is now being thrown into an unfavorable light. All to get into a Top 25, which studies show 77% of business leaders are not part of that club…mind-blowing!


Private schools give off the appearance of entitlement and influential parents / enablers. Whether right or wrong. And the “e” word (entitlement) is not a pretty label these days. Employers are looking for inclusivity, not exclusivity these days. This will be more evident within the next 5 years - who would have ever guessed we would have gotten rid of test scores. Grades and essays are next.


What will be the new metrics? I ask this as someone who comes from a family opposing standardized testing for over fifty years. My parents forbade schools from administering them to us. The first one I took was the PSAT.


The new standard is demonstrated inclusivity, whether it’s successfully grinding through and successfully navigating the challenges of public schools, joining or starting clubs that focus on social justice and other community improvements, or demonstrating entrepreneurial spirit through side hustles / new businesses. Students who have been subject to adverse conditions / environment, and then demonstrate perseverance and grittiness in overcoming those obstacles will rise to the top. Those who attend privates, showcase privilege, or follow the herd, will have a harder time. The next 10 years will not follow the last 50 years…save your money on tuition, let your kids fail then overcome in a challenging environment, then package that to the admissions folks. Resumes will replace essays and grades to some extent (pass/fail) and other potential trappings of influence.


This is why 77% of business leaders did not attend a Top 50 undergraduate program. Parents on this board stress about the wrong things and want to try and control the outcomes, based on what worked for them or others in the past. The model for “success” and playing field have changed dramatically and will continue to move in the direction for the good. If it seems like you child gained an edge through influence and privilege (regardless if accurate or not), then they will actually be at a disadvantage. Who knew??!


isn't it more impressive that 23% of business leaders come from only 50 colleges?


+1
That was my first thought. More than I had imagined since business leaders aren't typically thought of as the most academically inclined.


Most folks in the US earn a living through business, and usually those with the most intelligence, grit, interpersonal skills, etc rise to the top. Some of our nations smartest folks are employed by a business, not government or non-profit!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


A certain subset of UMC America thinks it matters where you go to college, both career-wise and in finding the "right" spouse.

This is what drives 90% of college obsession.


lol. Where you go to college can matter. The right spouse also matters wherever that person comes from. The idea that it does not matter at all is kind of silly. If you go to an awful college of course you still have the chance to do whatever you want. You have less ways to do it though. You also have more road blocks and roundabouts. Less so from a top school. Of course you can still screw it up but more paths; less roadblocks. UMC parents think this because they see it every day


Right - but it’s not the end-all-be-all that a lot of folks here make it out to be. Unless you are going to a top-50 or bottom 1/3 school, I’d doesn’t really matter all that much - or matter as much as the time, effort, expense, etc. I equate it to the travel sports frenzy that starts at age 10.


There's a difference between Top 10 school and a Top 50


There's really not in terms of outcomes...

https://lesshighschoolstress.com/page/6/




Wow…you are lifting the veneer of many folks’ psyche here… does that mean if my goal is a top 25 and I spend all this money on private schools from 4th grade, it’s all for naught? In all seriousness, folks here don’t get that attending a public school actually demonstrates your well-roundedness and resiliency. And it showcases your ability to interact and form lasting relationships across all socio and economic groups. There is no more diverse atmosphere than MCPS, FCPS, and other systems. Inclusivity is a trait desired by many business leaders, and isolating yourself in the bubble of private schools is now being thrown into an unfavorable light. All to get into a Top 25, which studies show 77% of business leaders are not part of that club…mind-blowing!


Private schools give off the appearance of entitlement and influential parents / enablers. Whether right or wrong. And the “e” word (entitlement) is not a pretty label these days. Employers are looking for inclusivity, not exclusivity these days. This will be more evident within the next 5 years - who would have ever guessed we would have gotten rid of test scores. Grades and essays are next.


What will be the new metrics? I ask this as someone who comes from a family opposing standardized testing for over fifty years. My parents forbade schools from administering them to us. The first one I took was the PSAT.


The new standard is demonstrated inclusivity, whether it’s successfully grinding through and successfully navigating the challenges of public schools, joining or starting clubs that focus on social justice and other community improvements, or demonstrating entrepreneurial spirit through side hustles / new businesses. Students who have been subject to adverse conditions / environment, and then demonstrate perseverance and grittiness in overcoming those obstacles will rise to the top. Those who attend privates, showcase privilege, or follow the herd, will have a harder time. The next 10 years will not follow the last 50 years…save your money on tuition, let your kids fail then overcome in a challenging environment, then package that to the admissions folks. Resumes will replace essays and grades to some extent (pass/fail) and other potential trappings of influence.


This is why 77% of business leaders did not attend a Top 50 undergraduate program. Parents on this board stress about the wrong things and want to try and control the outcomes, based on what worked for them or others in the past. The model for “success” and playing field have changed dramatically and will continue to move in the direction for the good. If it seems like you child gained an edge through influence and privilege (regardless if accurate or not), then they will actually be at a disadvantage. Who knew??!


isn't it more impressive that 23% of business leaders come from only 50 colleges?


+1
That was my first thought. More than I had imagined since business leaders aren't typically thought of as the most academically inclined.


Are you equally impressed that the next 23% come from #51-100 and the next 23% come from 101-150, and the next 23% come from 151-200? In other words, are you equally impressed that 92% of business leaders come from the top 200 schools?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:CEO-U: The Top 10 Universities for Fortune 500 Chief Executives
https://www.equilar.com/reports/44-ceo-u-top-10-universities-for-fortune-500-chief-executives.html

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Massachusetts 20 27

STANFORD UNIVERSITY
California 12 17

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Massachusetts 4 7

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
New York 6 6

DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
New Hampshire 6 6

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Michigan 6 6

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY
New York 4 5

UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME
Indiana 3 5

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Texas 4 4

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN
Texas 4 4

Feeling good my kid's school is there


So only 10 CEOs from 500 schools, or 10%…sounds statistically average to me..


Look again. This says that 69 CEOs of Fortune 500 companies -- 14 percent -- went to 10 universities. That's not statistically average at all. That's extraordinary.


Ok, but do the remaining 431 (86%) come from schools #51-172? If so, that’s statistically average - whiteout all of the crazy pressure to achieve a top 10 at all costs. It’s not the school but the talent of the kid that decides the path…


Sorry, meant #11-172 . 23% come from top 50 but if the others come #51-200, then the risk reward is neutral within it all the crazy! Smart kids at good and average schools will rise, not because you were lucky enough to get into a specific school


Well, I guess if the remaining 431 came from school 51 alone that would be even crazier. If you're making stuff up, just go all the way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


A certain subset of UMC America thinks it matters where you go to college, both career-wise and in finding the "right" spouse.

This is what drives 90% of college obsession.


lol. Where you go to college can matter. The right spouse also matters wherever that person comes from. The idea that it does not matter at all is kind of silly. If you go to an awful college of course you still have the chance to do whatever you want. You have less ways to do it though. You also have more road blocks and roundabouts. Less so from a top school. Of course you can still screw it up but more paths; less roadblocks. UMC parents think this because they see it every day


Right - but it’s not the end-all-be-all that a lot of folks here make it out to be. Unless you are going to a top-50 or bottom 1/3 school, I’d doesn’t really matter all that much - or matter as much as the time, effort, expense, etc. I equate it to the travel sports frenzy that starts at age 10.


There's a difference between Top 10 school and a Top 50


There's really not in terms of outcomes...

https://lesshighschoolstress.com/page/6/




Wow…you are lifting the veneer of many folks’ psyche here… does that mean if my goal is a top 25 and I spend all this money on private schools from 4th grade, it’s all for naught? In all seriousness, folks here don’t get that attending a public school actually demonstrates your well-roundedness and resiliency. And it showcases your ability to interact and form lasting relationships across all socio and economic groups. There is no more diverse atmosphere than MCPS, FCPS, and other systems. Inclusivity is a trait desired by many business leaders, and isolating yourself in the bubble of private schools is now being thrown into an unfavorable light. All to get into a Top 25, which studies show 77% of business leaders are not part of that club…mind-blowing!


Private schools give off the appearance of entitlement and influential parents / enablers. Whether right or wrong. And the “e” word (entitlement) is not a pretty label these days. Employers are looking for inclusivity, not exclusivity these days. This will be more evident within the next 5 years - who would have ever guessed we would have gotten rid of test scores. Grades and essays are next.


What will be the new metrics? I ask this as someone who comes from a family opposing standardized testing for over fifty years. My parents forbade schools from administering them to us. The first one I took was the PSAT.


The new standard is demonstrated inclusivity, whether it’s successfully grinding through and successfully navigating the challenges of public schools, joining or starting clubs that focus on social justice and other community improvements, or demonstrating entrepreneurial spirit through side hustles / new businesses. Students who have been subject to adverse conditions / environment, and then demonstrate perseverance and grittiness in overcoming those obstacles will rise to the top. Those who attend privates, showcase privilege, or follow the herd, will have a harder time. The next 10 years will not follow the last 50 years…save your money on tuition, let your kids fail then overcome in a challenging environment, then package that to the admissions folks. Resumes will replace essays and grades to some extent (pass/fail) and other potential trappings of influence.


This is why 77% of business leaders did not attend a Top 50 undergraduate program. Parents on this board stress about the wrong things and want to try and control the outcomes, based on what worked for them or others in the past. The model for “success” and playing field have changed dramatically and will continue to move in the direction for the good. If it seems like you child gained an edge through influence and privilege (regardless if accurate or not), then they will actually be at a disadvantage. Who knew??!


isn't it more impressive that 23% of business leaders come from only 50 colleges?


+1
That was my first thought. More than I had imagined since business leaders aren't typically thought of as the most academically inclined.


Are you equally impressed that the next 23% come from #51-100 and the next 23% come from 101-150, and the next 23% come from 151-200? In other words, are you equally impressed that 92% of business leaders come from the top 200 schools?


Is that true? I wouldn't expect that there's that even a distribution. I would expect that there's a path of non-college (trade to business owner), a lot of immigrants who don't come from a US college etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


A certain subset of UMC America thinks it matters where you go to college, both career-wise and in finding the "right" spouse.

This is what drives 90% of college obsession.


lol. Where you go to college can matter. The right spouse also matters wherever that person comes from. The idea that it does not matter at all is kind of silly. If you go to an awful college of course you still have the chance to do whatever you want. You have less ways to do it though. You also have more road blocks and roundabouts. Less so from a top school. Of course you can still screw it up but more paths; less roadblocks. UMC parents think this because they see it every day


Right - but it’s not the end-all-be-all that a lot of folks here make it out to be. Unless you are going to a top-50 or bottom 1/3 school, I’d doesn’t really matter all that much - or matter as much as the time, effort, expense, etc. I equate it to the travel sports frenzy that starts at age 10.


There's a difference between Top 10 school and a Top 50


There's really not in terms of outcomes...

https://lesshighschoolstress.com/page/6/




Wow…you are lifting the veneer of many folks’ psyche here… does that mean if my goal is a top 25 and I spend all this money on private schools from 4th grade, it’s all for naught? In all seriousness, folks here don’t get that attending a public school actually demonstrates your well-roundedness and resiliency. And it showcases your ability to interact and form lasting relationships across all socio and economic groups. There is no more diverse atmosphere than MCPS, FCPS, and other systems. Inclusivity is a trait desired by many business leaders, and isolating yourself in the bubble of private schools is now being thrown into an unfavorable light. All to get into a Top 25, which studies show 77% of business leaders are not part of that club…mind-blowing!


Private schools give off the appearance of entitlement and influential parents / enablers. Whether right or wrong. And the “e” word (entitlement) is not a pretty label these days. Employers are looking for inclusivity, not exclusivity these days. This will be more evident within the next 5 years - who would have ever guessed we would have gotten rid of test scores. Grades and essays are next.


What will be the new metrics? I ask this as someone who comes from a family opposing standardized testing for over fifty years. My parents forbade schools from administering them to us. The first one I took was the PSAT.


The new standard is demonstrated inclusivity, whether it’s successfully grinding through and successfully navigating the challenges of public schools, joining or starting clubs that focus on social justice and other community improvements, or demonstrating entrepreneurial spirit through side hustles / new businesses. Students who have been subject to adverse conditions / environment, and then demonstrate perseverance and grittiness in overcoming those obstacles will rise to the top. Those who attend privates, showcase privilege, or follow the herd, will have a harder time. The next 10 years will not follow the last 50 years…save your money on tuition, let your kids fail then overcome in a challenging environment, then package that to the admissions folks. Resumes will replace essays and grades to some extent (pass/fail) and other potential trappings of influence.


This is why 77% of business leaders did not attend a Top 50 undergraduate program. Parents on this board stress about the wrong things and want to try and control the outcomes, based on what worked for them or others in the past. The model for “success” and playing field have changed dramatically and will continue to move in the direction for the good. If it seems like you child gained an edge through influence and privilege (regardless if accurate or not), then they will actually be at a disadvantage. Who knew??!


isn't it more impressive that 23% of business leaders come from only 50 colleges?


+1
That was my first thought. More than I had imagined since business leaders aren't typically thought of as the most academically inclined.


Are you equally impressed that the next 23% come from #51-100 and the next 23% come from 101-150, and the next 23% come from 151-200? In other words, are you equally impressed that 92% of business leaders come from the top 200 schools?


is that the case?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I find this with a coterie of folks who are in government/non profit/writers, etc. They attended elite schools and cleave onto this as one of their key identifiers. I'm not talking school spirit, but dropping it a fair amount and distinguishing folks based on where they attended school. They are absolutely bonkers now about their kids attending same. And ones who attended school as full pay but are in jobs now that can't afford that really go off on how unfair it is. "Why should someone get that advantage?"

Of course, none of them were working for more equitable financial aid back in the day.


?? A majority of the GS-15s in my small agency went to state schools for undergrad.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:CEO-U: The Top 10 Universities for Fortune 500 Chief Executives
https://www.equilar.com/reports/44-ceo-u-top-10-universities-for-fortune-500-chief-executives.html

HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Massachusetts 20 27

STANFORD UNIVERSITY
California 12 17

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Massachusetts 4 7

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
New York 6 6

DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
New Hampshire 6 6

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
Michigan 6 6

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY
New York 4 5

UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME
Indiana 3 5

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Texas 4 4

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN
Texas 4 4

Feeling good my kid's school is there


So only 10 CEOs from 500 schools, or 10%…sounds statistically average to me..


Look again. This says that 69 CEOs of Fortune 500 companies -- 14 percent -- went to 10 universities. That's not statistically average at all. That's extraordinary.


Ok, but do the remaining 431 (86%) come from schools #51-172? If so, that’s statistically average - whiteout all of the crazy pressure to achieve a top 10 at all costs. It’s not the school but the talent of the kid that decides the path…


Sorry, meant #11-172 . 23% come from top 50 but if the others come #51-200, then the risk reward is neutral within it all the crazy! Smart kids at good and average schools will rise, not because you were lucky enough to get into a specific school


Well, I guess if the remaining 431 came from school 51 alone that would be even crazier. If you're making stuff up, just go all the way.


I think the posters point is that folks need to chill and not hyper focus on “top 50” to the detriment of other factors. It’s a starting point, it not the end-all-be-all. Some folks here would sell their souls for admittance. What are you telling your child when you tell them you are hiring an college essay consultant? Or SAT Tudor…or insert other crazy / privilege here. Take a chill pill as all will be ok…and for gosh sakes, don’t do all that to the detriment of the child’s mental health, esteem, relationships, etc.
Anonymous
Varsity Blues, anyone? The point of this post is the obsession with colleges, right??
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


The thing that kills me about it is that kids are moving out of their parent's homes. They will not be at home. Parents have bragging rights, but the kid isn't at home. So all this energy and effort and expense is going to a kid who is not going to be in the house, not for most of the year. Often kids get internships during the summer and are gone, essentially, except for a few weeks here and there for vacation or weekends, but they no longer live at home.

Why the obsession with where your kid goes to college? You aren't going with him or her. And they'll never look back. Two of my kids have graduated from college, and I have two younger kids who are about to go to college. The older ones are on their own. They call every once in a while if they need something, but essentially day to day parenting is a thing of the past. We don't really know what they're up to because they dont tell us. They live their own lives. They dont' thank us for all the energy, attention love and money we've lavished on them.

I'm not saying don't do it, but obsessing about college is this sort of last gasp of parenting before they leave the nest, and it's overblown and sad.

My kids went to HYPSM and wow, I feel really good when I tell other parents about it, but so what? That happens maybe once a year now adays, and the rest of the time I feel sad that my kids' lives are far away from mine. I really have little contact with them relative to when they lived at home. That's normal and natural, and I should feel proud that they're so independent, but it makes me feel really sad.

Anyway, I'm not obsessing with the younger kids. They're going to college somewhere, period, and good for them. I want them to be happy, but that's it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


The thing that kills me about it is that kids are moving out of their parent's homes. They will not be at home. Parents have bragging rights, but the kid isn't at home. So all this energy and effort and expense is going to a kid who is not going to be in the house, not for most of the year. Often kids get internships during the summer and are gone, essentially, except for a few weeks here and there for vacation or weekends, but they no longer live at home.

Why the obsession with where your kid goes to college? You aren't going with him or her. And they'll never look back. Two of my kids have graduated from college, and I have two younger kids who are about to go to college. The older ones are on their own. They call every once in a while if they need something, but essentially day to day parenting is a thing of the past. We don't really know what they're up to because they dont tell us. They live their own lives. They dont' thank us for all the energy, attention love and money we've lavished on them.

I'm not saying don't do it, but obsessing about college is this sort of last gasp of parenting before they leave the nest, and it's overblown and sad.

My kids went to HYPSM and wow, I feel really good when I tell other parents about it, but so what? That happens maybe once a year now adays, and the rest of the time I feel sad that my kids' lives are far away from mine. I really have little contact with them relative to when they lived at home. That's normal and natural, and I should feel proud that they're so independent, but it makes me feel really sad.

Anyway, I'm not obsessing with the younger kids. They're going to college somewhere, period, and good for them. I want them to be happy, but that's it.


I don’t even know what an HYPSM is, and I have a second child ready to launch. Maybe it’s impressive, but the reality is folks you tell don’t really care as much as you do, and simply rationalize “the why” anyways. I am a firm believer that 80% of your kids success or failure is the result of them alone (outside of your control), and 20% from their environment. So, let’s face it - you may be patting yourself on the back or cursing for your role in shaping the ultimate success of tour kid, but it’s mostly from factors not related to you or your style directly. I have found their social circle dictates more than your 20% anyways. So sit back, provide the best environment you can (that doesn’t mean privilege / privates / travel teams, etc) - instead an environment that teaches and prepares them for real life.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


The thing that kills me about it is that kids are moving out of their parent's homes. They will not be at home. Parents have bragging rights, but the kid isn't at home. So all this energy and effort and expense is going to a kid who is not going to be in the house, not for most of the year. Often kids get internships during the summer and are gone, essentially, except for a few weeks here and there for vacation or weekends, but they no longer live at home.

Why the obsession with where your kid goes to college? You aren't going with him or her. And they'll never look back. Two of my kids have graduated from college, and I have two younger kids who are about to go to college. The older ones are on their own. They call every once in a while if they need something, but essentially day to day parenting is a thing of the past. We don't really know what they're up to because they dont tell us. They live their own lives. They dont' thank us for all the energy, attention love and money we've lavished on them.

I'm not saying don't do it, but obsessing about college is this sort of last gasp of parenting before they leave the nest, and it's overblown and sad.

My kids went to HYPSM and wow, I feel really good when I tell other parents about it, but so what? That happens maybe once a year now adays, and the rest of the time I feel sad that my kids' lives are far away from mine. I really have little contact with them relative to when they lived at home. That's normal and natural, and I should feel proud that they're so independent, but it makes me feel really sad.

Anyway, I'm not obsessing with the younger kids. They're going to college somewhere, period, and good for them. I want them to be happy, but that's it.


I don’t even know what an HYPSM is, and I have a second child ready to launch. Maybe it’s impressive, but the reality is folks you tell don’t really care as much as you do, and simply rationalize “the why” anyways. I am a firm believer that 80% of your kids success or failure is the result of them alone (outside of your control), and 20% from their environment. So, let’s face it - you may be patting yourself on the back or cursing for your role in shaping the ultimate success of tour kid, but it’s mostly from factors not related to you or your style directly. I have found their social circle dictates more than your 20% anyways. So sit back, provide the best environment you can (that doesn’t mean privilege / privates / travel teams, etc) - instead an environment that teaches and prepares them for real life.


While supporting their mental state, interests, and dreams…this of course is beyond the basics of food, shelter, clothing, etc
Anonymous
I looked at the underlying report and it does not say that the various CEOs attended the schools as undergraduates. This is likely a combination of undergraduates plus all professional schools.

Just FYI.
Anonymous
As always you want to be cautious about the both sides of the extremists

Ones who are obsessed with college ranking and/name
Ones who are saying you can just go to any no name mediocre school and it's all good and there's no difference.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I looked at the underlying report and it does not say that the various CEOs attended the schools as undergraduates. This is likely a combination of undergraduates plus all professional schools.

Just FYI.


Thanks and not surprised. A common path to the top in business is good grades in a decent school (#50-150) with good internship / work experience to get into a great grad program / MBA. Then all the other stuff must kick in to get to top. And, let’s not forget about the Executive MBAs like Darden, Duke, Harvard and more, that focus more on the latter than the undergraduate school’s strength
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It can be exhausting.

Agreed?


The thing that kills me about it is that kids are moving out of their parent's homes. They will not be at home. Parents have bragging rights, but the kid isn't at home. So all this energy and effort and expense is going to a kid who is not going to be in the house, not for most of the year. Often kids get internships during the summer and are gone, essentially, except for a few weeks here and there for vacation or weekends, but they no longer live at home.

Why the obsession with where your kid goes to college? You aren't going with him or her. And they'll never look back. Two of my kids have graduated from college, and I have two younger kids who are about to go to college. The older ones are on their own. They call every once in a while if they need something, but essentially day to day parenting is a thing of the past. We don't really know what they're up to because they dont tell us. They live their own lives. They dont' thank us for all the energy, attention love and money we've lavished on them.

I'm not saying don't do it, but obsessing about college is this sort of last gasp of parenting before they leave the nest, and it's overblown and sad.

My kids went to HYPSM and wow, I feel really good when I tell other parents about it, but so what? That happens maybe once a year now adays, and the rest of the time I feel sad that my kids' lives are far away from mine. I really have little contact with them relative to when they lived at home. That's normal and natural, and I should feel proud that they're so independent, but it makes me feel really sad.

Anyway, I'm not obsessing with the younger kids. They're going to college somewhere, period, and good for them. I want them to be happy, but that's it.


This is a very profound post and it makes me sad.

Focus on maintaining an open relationship with your child so they want to visit you often or they allow you to visit them. This can be harmed in the pursuit of the T10 college, sometimes.
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: