Georgia Senate Runoff - official

[Anonymous]

CNN’s Manu Raju now saying Osoff’s result might not become clear till noon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Revenge is a dish best served blue.

Get over yourself.

There's no such thing as revenge.

Victory is sweet, though.

Revenge is totally a thing. Though, technically it is the Lord’s, if you believe Deuteronomy 32:35. And we do have a victory, which is very sweet indeed.

No, I stand by my statement: There is no such thing as revenge. It never succeeds. It's a failed strategy. I don't care what the Bible says. Revenge, true revenge, does not exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:CNN’s Manu Raju now saying Osoff’s result might not become clear till noon.

They are simply being modest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:CNN’s Manu Raju now saying Osoff’s result might not become clear till noon.

Nail biter indeed. Don't count your chickens....

[Anonymous]

The people want Hot Ossoff.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Democrats have no issue with an actual reverend being elected to office, but your heads exploded when a devout Catholic inexperienced Trump puppet was appointed to the SC. So intriguing.

Is it really? Huh. Not to me.

Most people prattling on about Amy were Rs claiming Ds had issues. It was actually funny to watch.

You must be new here. There were hundreds of pages of posts by unhinged liberals gnashing their teeth at the thought of Barrett on SCOTUS. But I do agree, it was quite funny to watch.
DP

Ossoff will be the gift that keeps on giving! We needed more like AOC in Congress.

[Anonymous]

Mitch must be s*itting himself. You guys should have voted to remove the Orange Turd when you had the opportunity. He destroyed your party and nearly destroyed the country. F*ckers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Democrats have no issue with an actual reverend being elected to office, but your heads exploded when a devout Catholic inexperienced Trump puppet was appointed to the SC. So intriguing.

Is it really? Huh. Not to me.

Most people prattling on about Amy were Rs claiming Ds had issues. It was actually funny to watch.

You must be new here. There were hundreds of pages of posts by unhinged liberals gnashing their teeth at the thought of Barrett on SCOTUS. But I do agree, it was quite funny to watch.
DP

Ossoff will be the gift that keeps on giving! We needed more like AOC in Congress.

Lolol. I get it? Bc they both hotties.

[Anonymous]

The NY Times says there are 93,000 votes left to count and that Warnock's and Ossoff's estimated shares of those uncounted votes will be 77%. That'd give them each a net gain of 71,000 votes. If true, Ossoff would win by 69,000 votes (1.5%) and Warnock by 106,000 votes (2.5%).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The NY Times says there are 93,000 votes left to count and that Warnock's and Ossoff's estimated shares of those uncounted votes will be 77%. That'd give them each a net gain of 71,000 votes. If true, Ossoff would win by 69,000 votes (1.5%) and Warnock by 106,000 votes (2.5%).

That tracks because all of the experts were predicting that Warnock would do better than Ossoff. Mostly because Loeffler was worse than Perdue.

[Anonymous]

And here I sit in North Carolina with two stupid Republican Senators.

Happy for Georgia and the country, though!

[Anonymous]

What about absentee ballots and provisionals?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Revenge is a dish best served blue.

Get over yourself.

There's no such thing as revenge.

Victory is sweet, though.

Revenge is totally a thing. Though, technically it is the Lord’s, if you believe Deuteronomy 32:35. And we do have a victory, which is very sweet indeed.

No, I stand by my statement: There is no such thing as revenge. It never succeeds. It's a failed strategy. I don't care what the Bible says. Revenge, true revenge, does not exist.

If you’re talking about harming someone that harmed you? I follow and agree that ultimately you reap what you sow. However, if you’re taking revenge in the meaning of retribution for an intentional harm, to correct a wrong? Yes, that is a thing. An honest election and a fair fight is a sweet revenge to a duplicitous thief. But I’m guessing you’re referring to “true revenge” as the harmful, bitter, angry type that seeks ill will to others that hurt them. If so then I can clarify and agree that a constant trade of ill will rot the soul and (to your point) return more harm often in an unpredictable form. So, I get your point. I’m not an advocate for going rogue; I’d prefer repair and healing. Which does require ensuring that dangerous threats to that process are held accountable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The NY Times says there are 93,000 votes left to count and that Warnock's and Ossoff's estimated shares of those uncounted votes will be 77%. That'd give them each a net gain of 71,000 votes. If true, Ossoff would win by 69,000 votes (1.5%) and Warnock by 106,000 votes (2.5%).

Still a nail biter. I wish the margins were wider in favor of the Dems.

Ossoff has to win to give Mitch the boot.