Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ford's lawyers protest proposed Senate Judiciary plan to have an experienced sex crimes prosecutor do the questioning on Thursday. They are asking for the prosecutor's identity but assume seem to know hired prosecutor is a female as they ask to meet with her tomorrow. Letter re-iterates the complaint that White House hasn't asked the FBI to investigate.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/1044392822496002049/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1044392822496002049&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fhearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful%2F


Laying the groundwork for a noisy withdrawal from the hearing maybe.

If that prosecutor questions Ford, Bromwich should question Kavanaugh.


What is a Bromwich?


Read links, people. Bromwich is one of Ford’s lawyers.


Your link does not say that.
Anonymous
The only she looked like she believed is that he isn't withdrawing. She was animated about that. Even she doesn't believe him on the rest of it.
Anonymous
I don’t get it. Why does Team Doctor prefer to have the old GOP gang question here. Graham is a brilliant interrogator. Kennedy is unbelievably gifted at reducing witnesses to rubble. Hatch is a wild card.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This story about the woman Kavanaugh and his buddies slut-shaming a woman in their HS yearbook is disgusting. And it also shows that Kavanaugh is willing to lie about little things - like why he put her name on his yearbook memories page - which means he's willing to lie about the big things. It also shows all that claptrap about always respecting women in the interview tonight was BS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html



Yep, agree with this. He is never going to stop lying.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The only she looked like she believed is that he isn't withdrawing. She was animated about that. Even she doesn't believe him on the rest of it.


sad to say it, but they’ll probably end up divorced with her remarried to a Democratic politician or a NeverTrumper neocon.
Anonymous
Team Brett/Turtle: Probe all you want, were not pulling out! Plow through it!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The only she looked like she believed is that he isn't withdrawing. She was animated about that. Even she doesn't believe him on the rest of it.


sad to say it, but they’ll probably end up divorced with her remarried to a Democratic politician or a NeverTrumper neocon.


I think she is super conservative and will marry another republican. She may dump him but she won't change parties. She is a west texas republican who worked for Bush for many years. No way she would leave the GOP. Having a husband who humiliates you on national tv? I think she will dump him. He is scum.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ford's lawyers protest proposed Senate Judiciary plan to have an experienced sex crimes prosecutor do the questioning on Thursday. They are asking for the prosecutor's identity but assume seem to know hired prosecutor is a female as they ask to meet with her tomorrow. Letter re-iterates the complaint that White House hasn't asked the FBI to investigate.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/1044392822496002049/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1044392822496002049&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fhearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful%2F


Laying the groundwork for a noisy withdrawal from the hearing maybe.

If that prosecutor questions Ford, Bromwich should question Kavanaugh.


What is a Bromwich?


Read links, people. Bromwich is one of Ford’s lawyers.


Your link does not say that.

Really?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They already signed. Why keep commenting?

Um, the facts on the ground have changed?

The only thing that's changed is your level of crazed desperation. Good luck with that!

The crazed desperation today was from Mitch McConnell with his “NOT ONE STEP BACK” speech.


And what a HORRIBLE fox news interview. He just about sunk whatever is left of the ship on that one. It will live in infamy, long after he’s flipping burgers. His wife looked at him with sheer loathing. It’s over.


When your husband is defending himself by hyping up his longstandibg virginity, a lot of thoughts have got to be running through your head. Who am I, why am I here,
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. Why does Team Doctor prefer to have the old GOP gang question here. Graham is a brilliant interrogator. Kennedy is unbelievably gifted at reducing witnesses to rubble. Hatch is a wild card.


Demographics. All old white men.
And all three (& more) are liable to say something stupid. See Grahams Chris Wallace interview Sunday, Kennedy’s CNN hits.
These guys just want to get to a vote, and being on TV with her the day before can only hurt.
They know they don’t get #metoo and that will come out if they confront her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ford's lawyers protest proposed Senate Judiciary plan to have an experienced sex crimes prosecutor do the questioning on Thursday. They are asking for the prosecutor's identity but assume seem to know hired prosecutor is a female as they ask to meet with her tomorrow. Letter re-iterates the complaint that White House hasn't asked the FBI to investigate.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/1044392822496002049/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1044392822496002049&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fhearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful%2F


Laying the groundwork for a noisy withdrawal from the hearing maybe.

If that prosecutor questions Ford, Bromwich should question Kavanaugh.


What is a Bromwich?


Read links, people. Bromwich is one of Ford’s lawyers.


Your link does not say that.

Really?


It does not identify him as a lawyer in the signature block.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. Why does Team Doctor prefer to have the old GOP gang question here. Graham is a brilliant interrogator. Kennedy is unbelievably gifted at reducing witnesses to rubble. Hatch is a wild card.


They think she will get more sympathy if she is questioned by a group that is exclusively old and male than if she is questioned by a single female.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. Why does Team Doctor prefer to have the old GOP gang question here. Graham is a brilliant interrogator. Kennedy is unbelievably gifted at reducing witnesses to rubble. Hatch is a wild card.


This isn't a criminal proceeding. I am not sure why they would possibly want to have a criminal prosecutor question her. I think the senators should have to do it themselves, but they are scared it will hurt them if they do question her themselves.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The only she looked like she believed is that he isn't withdrawing. She was animated about that. Even she doesn't believe him on the rest of it.


I think she wants him to withdraw so they can just go back to their old life. And can you imagine trying to explain this to and/or shield your daughters from this? She just wants this nightmare to be over.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ford's lawyers protest proposed Senate Judiciary plan to have an experienced sex crimes prosecutor do the questioning on Thursday. They are asking for the prosecutor's identity but assume seem to know hired prosecutor is a female as they ask to meet with her tomorrow. Letter re-iterates the complaint that White House hasn't asked the FBI to investigate.

https://twitter.com/frankthorp/status/1044392822496002049/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1044392822496002049&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fhearing-in-doubt-christine-fords-lawyer-rips-senate-plan-to-have-prosecutor-ask-questions-not-fair-and-respectful%2F


Laying the groundwork for a noisy withdrawal from the hearing maybe.

If that prosecutor questions Ford, Bromwich should question Kavanaugh.


What is a Bromwich?


Read links, people. Bromwich is one of Ford’s lawyers.


Your link does not say that.

Really?


It does not identify him as a lawyer in the signature block.

Who else would be communicating on behalf of ford to the judiciary committee?
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: