GDS Student Newspaper posts about the horrible incident

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

I would hope parents and students would not simply allow that to happen. It’s a bad safety culture and the a very bad look.

The school literally took every step that it could take for safety culture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so far detached from reality. In the real world it is obvious that what could be done was done and that there isn’t a lot left to do on the part of the school. Psychotic ramblings from the person who in every post uses terms like fixer and goes on insane tangents about Epstein…well that’s just happening on this little corner of the internet.

Don’t forget “Russel” poster.

[Anonymous]

Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

Don’t have to pretend. Sounds like nothing has actually occurred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

I would hope parents and students would not simply allow that to happen. It’s a bad safety culture and the a very bad look.

The school literally took every step that it could take for safety culture.

Great, that’s a relief. Please list them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

I think you misspelled “perfectly reasonable behavior”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

I think you misspelled “perfectly reasonable behavior”

The report is just a cover up consultant advising the school how to limit their liability and maintain PR. It is only going to be inflammatory and insulting to the victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

I think you misspelled “perfectly reasonable behavior”

The report is just a cover up consultant advising the school how to limit their liability and maintain PR. It is only going to be inflammatory and insulting to the victim.

Alleged victim.

[Anonymous]

It is a mistake to think the “independent investigation” was focused on solving the crime. The goal was actually just strategy for the school to deal with the allegations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is a mistake to think the “independent investigation” was focused on solving the crime. The goal was actually just strategy for the school to deal with the allegations.

which is … the right thing for the school to do? The school is not actually a law enforcement agency. So the investigation is to help it figure out what to do. If the school refused to cooperate with MPD that would be a different story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is a mistake to think the “independent investigation” was focused on solving the crime. The goal was actually just strategy for the school to deal with the allegations.

which is … the right thing for the school to do? The school is not actually a law enforcement agency. So the investigation is to help it figure out what to do. If the school refused to cooperate with MPD that would be a different story.

It makes them look guilty and also not releasing the report to the victim makes them look like the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

What privilege? There's no consultant privilege, they didn't hire a law firm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

What privilege? There's no consultant privilege, they didn't hire a law firm.

Well it could be that the school has a law firm and the law firm hired the T&M Group. Isnt that the simple way people navigate privilege? The report is work product paid by the lawyers....who in turn just pass through a cost to the ultimate client, GDS