GDS Student Newspaper posts about the horrible incident

[Anonymous]

It's amazing that the board consist of numerous big law partners who likely aren't very talented lawyers but are great sales people. As sales professionals they should understand what this type of conduct does to their reputation.

[Anonymous]

Maybe they should take the advice of the students who run the consent summit and fix their own culture. Instead they keep doubling down.

[Anonymous]

Why did the parents of the little boy wait this long to send the email the school community?

[Anonymous]

The school had asked them to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MPD may have asked the board to restrict community-wide communications on this back when the MPD investigation began. But there's zero reason that request/instruction should have continued once the MPD investigation was closed. If the family was pushing for a public request for information at that point, the only reason the board could have had for refusing to say anything was to avoid looking bad. Ironic, given what's happened now.

No, they could have reasonably not wanted to add fuel to the fire. This thread is evidence that there are some pretty unhinged obsessives out there. even if they redacted names from the reports there is still a risk of identifying the individuals in the report. I’m not sure what privacy laws would apply but the school would be acting prudently to keep it to keep it confidential. They may have/likely did promise confidentiality to some of the people that they interviewed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MPD may have asked the board to restrict community-wide communications on this back when the MPD investigation began. But there's zero reason that request/instruction should have continued once the MPD investigation was closed. If the family was pushing for a public request for information at that point, the only reason the board could have had for refusing to say anything was to avoid looking bad. Ironic, given what's happened now.

The family should not have been forced to send that email. The tone of communications from the school is troubling. We are talking about a raped young child here. And about a culture of shaming and silencing on full display. What a breach of trust with ALL families.

Allegedly raped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The school had asked them to.

How do you know that? That was not said in any email.

[Anonymous]

Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MPD may have asked the board to restrict community-wide communications on this back when the MPD investigation began. But there's zero reason that request/instruction should have continued once the MPD investigation was closed. If the family was pushing for a public request for information at that point, the only reason the board could have had for refusing to say anything was to avoid looking bad. Ironic, given what's happened now.

No, they could have reasonably not wanted to add fuel to the fire. This thread is evidence that there are some pretty unhinged obsessives out there. even if they redacted names from the reports there is still a risk of identifying the individuals in the report. I’m not sure what privacy laws would apply but the school would be acting prudently to keep it to keep it confidential. They may have/likely did promise confidentiality to some of the people that they interviewed.

This still doesn't explain why Russel wouldn't share the report with the family. Russel should stop writing for the Atlantic and start taking ethics classes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

The school will move on because the truth is obvious to everyone except the few crazies here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

The school will move on because the truth is obvious to everyone except the few crazies here.

Worked for the Catholic Church as a strategy, until it didn’t.

Wonder if consent summit attendance will dip due to the hypocrisy of it all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MPD may have asked the board to restrict community-wide communications on this back when the MPD investigation began. But there's zero reason that request/instruction should have continued once the MPD investigation was closed. If the family was pushing for a public request for information at that point, the only reason the board could have had for refusing to say anything was to avoid looking bad. Ironic, given what's happened now.

No, they could have reasonably not wanted to add fuel to the fire. This thread is evidence that there are some pretty unhinged obsessives out there. even if they redacted names from the reports there is still a risk of identifying the individuals in the report. I’m not sure what privacy laws would apply but the school would be acting prudently to keep it to keep it confidential. They may have/likely did promise confidentiality to some of the people that they interviewed.

This still doesn't explain why Russel wouldn't share the report with the family. Russel should stop writing for the Atlantic and start taking ethics classes.

It’s a bigger issue than just him, but could be a start.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

I would hope parents and students would not simply allow that to happen. It’s a bad safety culture and the a very bad look.

[Anonymous]

This thread is so far detached from reality. In the real world it is obvious that what could be done was done and that there isn’t a lot left to do on the part of the school. Psychotic ramblings from the person who in every post uses terms like fixer and goes on insane tangents about Epstein…well that’s just happening on this little corner of the internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so far detached from reality. In the real world it is obvious that what could be done was done and that there isn’t a lot left to do on the part of the school. Psychotic ramblings from the person who in every post uses terms like fixer and goes on insane tangents about Epstein…well that’s just happening on this little corner of the internet.

DP

They're not. It isn't. And it isn't clear that any of that is true.

But, I said it before and don't know why it was deleted. There is no reason not to share the 3rd party report with the family. The whole purpose of hiring a 3rd party to write a report is to make the 3rd party the scapegoat for unpleasant news.