Harvard tell Trump to pound sand

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leftist hotbeds and power centers are being dismantled piece by piece.

How is it that people like Kavanaugh, Vance and Trump attended these universities and yet you still call them "leftist hotbeds?"

I mean, half the student bodies at these schools are conservatives, even if they aren't MAGAs.

DP. Please provide evidence from a neutral source to support the assertion that “half the student bodies at these schools are conservatives ….” Thanks in advance!

You realize that these universities comprise a bunch of schools?

Harvard Business School's professors and students are mostly conservative.

Harvard Medical School, Harvard Divinity School -- who knows?

[Anonymous]

I’m so afraid that Harvard will cave. I hope they stand strong.

[Anonymous]

De-escalation is not in Trump's vocabulary. Like an orange moth humping a light bulb, Trump will keep ratcheting up the tension until it explodes in his face like he did with January 6th.

It will be hilarious if Harvard ends up being his Waterloo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Donald Trump is not entitled to make micromanagement a condition of getting federal funds. These are appropriated funds, not Donald trumps personal money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Harvard is one of the few schools that could actually pull this off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Even if they took zero money for THE GRANTS THEY APPLIED FOR AND WON, Trump would still be coming after them. What don't you get about this?
Federal money does not mean the govt gets to look at private discipline records.

Just shut up

[Anonymous]

It might be time to change the title of this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Donald Trump is not entitled to make micromanagement a condition of getting federal funds. These are appropriated funds, not Donald trumps personal money.

Exactly. What is Trump said he wants the student body to be only males or only females? Same argument pp?

For a type who probably complains non stop about govt overreach, too many people are way too comfortable with this.

[Anonymous]

Harvard needs to go back to more teaching, less "research". It's a hedge fund with a diploma printer attached.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harvard needs to go back to more teaching, less "research". It's a hedge fund with a diploma printer attached.

Whatever they need to do it is not Trump's right to strong arm them because they said no to his illegal and unethical demands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harvard needs to go back to more teaching, less "research". It's a hedge fund with a diploma printer attached.

I take it you haven't even taken a tour, much less gone to school there?

You are spouting nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Donald Trump is not entitled to make micromanagement a condition of getting federal funds. These are appropriated funds, not Donald trumps personal money.

You don't “micromanage” $5 billion dollars. You macro manage it when it is being given to an organization that doesn’t comply with the civil rights laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Donald Trump is not entitled to make micromanagement a condition of getting federal funds. These are appropriated funds, not Donald trumps personal money.

You don't “micromanage” $5 billion dollars. You macro manage it when it is being given to an organization that doesn’t comply with the civil rights laws.

Oh, what laws specifically did Harvard break? Be specific.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:De-escalation is not in Trump's vocabulary. Like an orange moth humping a light bulb, Trump will keep ratcheting up the tension until it explodes in his face like he did with January 6th.

It will be hilarious if Harvard ends up being his Waterloo.

Oh. I so hope so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard needs to go back to more teaching, less "research". It's a hedge fund with a diploma printer attached.

Whatever they need to do it is not Trump's right to strong arm them because they said no to his illegal and unethical demands.

They are welcome to say no.
But they are not entitled to visas for foreign nationals and certainly not to billions of dollars.