Harvard tell Trump to pound sand

[Anonymous]

So much for “small government”

Trumpism carried on the tradition of Maoism and Stalinism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Donald Trump is not entitled to make micromanagement a condition of getting federal funds. These are appropriated funds, not Donald trumps personal money.

You don't “micromanage” $5 billion dollars. You macro manage it when it is being given to an organization that doesn’t comply with the civil rights laws.

That’s exactly what he’s attempted to do. Did you not read his list of demands?

There is a legally required process for revoking federal funds if the government alleges a university is not complying with civil rights laws. The government didn’t even try to do that in this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard needs to go back to more teaching, less "research". It's a hedge fund with a diploma printer attached.

I take it you haven't even taken a tour, much less gone to school there?

You are spouting nonsense.

I said it before. I'll say it again. You're power centers are being threatened. GOOD.

Maybe you'll think about that the next time you consider raiding a former president's house with a SWAT team and arresting him.

You bet this is about revenge. I fully approve of it.

What's happened to you in your life that you feel so unempowered and so venomous towards your fellow citizens?

It just shows how much they hate America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It might be time to change the title of this thread.

Not until Harvard caves to any of these asinine illegal demands, and it has shown no intention of doing so.

[Anonymous]

Wow I read that 27% of Harvard is foreign students , it's back door immigration and taking educational slots from Americans , wild

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow I read that 27% of Harvard is foreign students , it's back door immigration and taking educational slots from Americans , wild

Huh? There are plenty of university spots in the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

This goes beyond government funding

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

People are not entitled to seats at Harvard. And the federal government has NO place dictating this on any level.

And Harvard is not entitled to federal monies. If they don't want to be under the government’s thumb, they have the option of not taking any federal funding.

Donald Trump is not entitled to make micromanagement a condition of getting federal funds. These are appropriated funds, not Donald trumps personal money.

You don't “micromanage” $5 billion dollars. You macro manage it when it is being given to an organization that doesn’t comply with the civil rights laws.

Oh, what laws specifically did Harvard break? Be specific.

They probably violated the president’s constitutional habeas corpus right to deport people.

/s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow I read that 27% of Harvard is foreign students , it's back door immigration and taking educational slots from Americans , wild

So Americans need DEI admissions to get into Harvard now?

You can't make this stuff up, folks.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She seems not to understand that financial aid comes from those high foreign tuition payments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard needs to go back to more teaching, less "research". It's a hedge fund with a diploma printer attached.

Whatever they need to do it is not Trump's right to strong arm them because they said no to his illegal and unethical demands.

They are welcome to say no.
But they are not entitled to visas for foreign nationals and certainly not to billions of dollars.

They won't get visas for a few years. Stupid. Trump will go and they will get visas again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

Do you also think you’re entitled to be captain of the aircraft carrier your tax money bought? Harvard receives public funding for research that benefits all Americans.

No, but I do expect that the aircraft carrier would be used for my benefit instead of used to defend foreign countries and shoot me.

You know that foreign students pay a lot of money to go to school here? It's a valuable export.

And then they go out in the world eith a positive view of the US. Or they used to.

LOL!! That’s a good one
!! Yeah, all those Chinese students who steal our technology & snoop on military installations go home & rave about how great we are!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm: Harvard’s student body has been, approximately:

1/3 foreign students (who usually pay full tuition), plus

1/3 legacy students, leaving:

Just 1/3rd of seats left for the rest of deserving high school students to fight over, especially without an athletic hook (at least the S.Ct took away Harvard’s racist admissions preference).

No wonder it’s nearly impossible to get into Harvard.

I have no problem with the administration’s move today. My high-achieving but unhooked children never had any realistic chance of getting in anyway.

Absolutely. It's important to recognize that U.S. taxpayers have poured billions into Harvard University, yet they are often excluded from accessing its resources and opportunities. This disparity raises serious questions about the value and return on investment for the public.

Do you also think you’re entitled to be captain of the aircraft carrier your tax money bought? Harvard receives public funding for research that benefits all Americans.

No, but I do expect that the aircraft carrier would be used for my benefit instead of used to defend foreign countries and shoot me.

You know that foreign students pay a lot of money to go to school here? It's a valuable export.

And then they go out in the world eith a positive view of the US. Or they used to.

LOL!! That’s a good one
!! Yeah, all those Chinese students who steal our technology & snoop on military installations go home & rave about how great we are!!!

Point taken. I agree Chinese students can be risky. (I say that as someone who has lived in China.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She seems not to understand that financial aid comes from those high foreign tuition payments.

When there are ants in the house, do you pour honey on the floors?