Stefanik Ivy Presidentd

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The free-speech problem is perhaps solvable. Reacquiring the ability to distinguish right from wrong will be a bigger challenge. Penn and other colleges issued equivocating statements after Oct. 7 that drew false equivalences between Israel and Hamas. After sadistic terrorists killed 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals—torturing, raping and parading the mutilated corpses of women and children—these universities didn’t call out the terrorism. Rather, they seemed to call for perspective and balance.

Israel has built a successful, prosperous, democratic, law-abiding, diverse society out of the desert while under near constant attack from much larger enemies and terrorists. In contrast, Palestinian leaders have rejected generous peace offers for 75 years and kept their subjects in squalor to generate the next generation of jihadists. Even if one disagrees with these truths, nothing on earth justifies the medieval barbarism of Oct. 7. Yet despite the obvious right and wrong, elite university orthodoxy holds that prosperous societies must be evil and failed societies must be oppressed and therefore good.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/liz-magill-is-out-at-penn-its-a-start-antisemitism-progressive-biased-censorship-e3d5d6f7?st=c6ri4j33zt3538v&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

At this point, I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect anyone not already wearing the American / Israeli combo flag lapel pin to read biased, one-sided praise of the State of Israel or endorsements of a breathtakingly expansive definition of anti-semitism - in a WSJ op-ed penned by a Jewish author, no less - without rolling their eyes out of their skull.

True believers gonna believe, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

Yes, exactly. This graphic was produced at Harvard. This graphic is taught to every Harvard undergrad as part of their Title IX introductory course:



It is toxic and extremely divisive.

Harvard is hardly alone in teaching this sort of divisive, extremist dogma.

Extremism does not belong on campus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. The other two presidents (one ex-president, rather) - Magill and Kornbluth - have also failed. Both of those women are white. I guess it's somehow ok (with YOU) to say that about white women, but not ok to say the same thing about a black woman. Tell us why that is. Actually, no - don't. We all know why that is.

Magill is out and doesn’t seem to have a history of plagiarism. Kornbluth doesn’t have a history of plagiarism either, as far as we know. So they aren’t exactly identical as far as evaluating performance.

But yes, all three have failed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

Are you trying to use logic with a progressive? Come on man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. The other two presidents (one ex-president, rather) - Magill and Kornbluth - have also failed. Both of those women are white. I guess it's somehow ok (with YOU) to say that about white women, but not ok to say the same thing about a black woman. Tell us why that is. Actually, no - don't. We all know why that is.

Magill is out and doesn’t seem to have a history of plagiarism. Kornbluth doesn’t have a history of plagiarism either, as far as we know. So they aren’t exactly identical as far as evaluating performance.

But yes, all three have failed.

They have.

But at this point, Gay and Kornbluth will simply run out the clock. Six months from now, people won't be talking about this.

Will be very curious though to see what admissions will look like at Penn, Harvard, and MIT a year from now. I suspect there will be no difference at MIT. But Penn and Harvard? Obviously all the try-hards will continue to apply. But genuinely talented students? Particularly Jewish or students that don't really click with progressive orthodoxy?

I think there's a good chance Harvard becomes Oberlin going forward. I don't know about Penn. Probably more fratty. But a think a lot of really good students will want to stay away from this noise. Princeton and Duke looking much better. This was a genuinely disastrous performance by the presidents of Harvard and Penn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

Yes, exactly. This graphic was produced at Harvard. This graphic is taught to every Harvard undergrad as part of their Title IX introductory course:



It is toxic and extremely divisive.

Harvard is hardly alone in teaching this sort of divisive, extremist dogma.

Extremism does not belong on campus.

I've never seen that image before. What drivel!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. The other two presidents (one ex-president, rather) - Magill and Kornbluth - have also failed. Both of those women are white. I guess it's somehow ok (with YOU) to say that about white women, but not ok to say the same thing about a black woman. Tell us why that is. Actually, no - don't. We all know why that is.

Magill is out and doesn’t seem to have a history of plagiarism. Kornbluth doesn’t have a history of plagiarism either, as far as we know. So they aren’t exactly identical as far as evaluating performance.

But yes, all three have failed.

They have.

But at this point, Gay and Kornbluth will simply run out the clock. Six months from now, people won't be talking about this.

Will be very curious though to see what admissions will look like at Penn, Harvard, and MIT a year from now. I suspect there will be no difference at MIT. But Penn and Harvard? Obviously all the try-hards will continue to apply. But genuinely talented students? Particularly Jewish or students that don't really click with progressive orthodoxy?

I think there's a good chance Harvard becomes Oberlin going forward. I don't know about Penn. Probably more fratty. But a think a lot of really good students will want to stay away from this noise. Princeton and Duke looking much better. This was a genuinely disastrous performance by the presidents of Harvard and Penn.

I agree nothing will happen, though I wonder if that changes if there is concrete evidence of Harvard students being expelled for plagiarism that’s a lot less than what Gay did. That may come out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

Are you assigning blame for Dr. Gay's reported plagiarism to the GOP?

+1
The PP is a complete moron. Apparently, being black shelters you from any criticism, even deserved criticism. Enough of this nonsense.

You’re the racist moron who called Gay a “diversity hire.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The free-speech problem is perhaps solvable. Reacquiring the ability to distinguish right from wrong will be a bigger challenge. Penn and other colleges issued equivocating statements after Oct. 7 that drew false equivalences between Israel and Hamas. After sadistic terrorists killed 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals—torturing, raping and parading the mutilated corpses of women and children—these universities didn’t call out the terrorism. Rather, they seemed to call for perspective and balance.

Israel has built a successful, prosperous, democratic, law-abiding, diverse society out of the desert while under near constant attack from much larger enemies and terrorists. In contrast, Palestinian leaders have rejected generous peace offers for 75 years and kept their subjects in squalor to generate the next generation of jihadists. Even if one disagrees with these truths, nothing on earth justifies the medieval barbarism of Oct. 7. Yet despite the obvious right and wrong, elite university orthodoxy holds that prosperous societies must be evil and failed societies must be oppressed and therefore good.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/liz-magill-is-out-at-penn-its-a-start-antisemitism-progressive-biased-censorship-e3d5d6f7?st=c6ri4j33zt3538v&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

At this point, I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect anyone not already wearing the American / Israeli combo flag lapel pin to read biased, one-sided praise of the State of Israel or endorsements of a breathtakingly expansive definition of anti-semitism - in a WSJ op-ed penned by a Jewish author, no less - without rolling their eyes out of their skull.

True believers gonna believe, I guess.

Do you not believe in data? Sounds like it. There is plenty of polling that shows most Americans “side” with the Israelis over the Palestinians at the moment. College campuses and other institutions which are dominated by left-wing elites are outliers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

Yes, exactly. This graphic was produced at Harvard. This graphic is taught to every Harvard undergrad as part of their Title IX introductory course:



It is toxic and extremely divisive.

Harvard is hardly alone in teaching this sort of divisive, extremist dogma.

Extremism does not belong on campus.

I think much of what is in the wheel is fine. The issue is what is on the outside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

Yes, exactly. This graphic was produced at Harvard. This graphic is taught to every Harvard undergrad as part of their Title IX introductory course:



It is toxic and extremely divisive.

Harvard is hardly alone in teaching this sort of divisive, extremist dogma.

Extremism does not belong on campus.

I think much of what is in the wheel is fine. The issue is what is on the outside.

Did anyone catch the recent NYT article on Columbia's school of social work?

It's insane.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/07/opinion/social-work-columbia-ideology.html?mwgrp=c-dbar&unlocked_article_code=1.F00.-K96.ReWjn_eNWE_B&hpgrp=k-abar&smid=url-share

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

Are you assigning blame for Dr. Gay's reported plagiarism to the GOP?

+1
The PP is a complete moron. Apparently, being black shelters you from any criticism, even deserved criticism. Enough of this nonsense.

You’re the racist moron who called Gay a “diversity hire.”

DP
And I’m guessing you’re the moron who said “if you consider yourself an ally you’ve got a lot of work to do”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

Yes, exactly. This graphic was produced at Harvard. This graphic is taught to every Harvard undergrad as part of their Title IX introductory course:



It is toxic and extremely divisive.

Harvard is hardly alone in teaching this sort of divisive, extremist dogma.

Extremism does not belong on campus.

I think much of what is in the wheel is fine. The issue is what is on the outside.

Did anyone catch the recent NYT article on Columbia's school of social work?

It's insane.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/07/opinion/social-work-columbia-ideology.html?mwgrp=c-dbar&unlocked_article_code=1.F00.-K96.ReWjn_eNWE_B&hpgrp=k-abar&smid=url-share

I can't believe the NYT actually printed that. It doesn't support leftist insanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Update: There are now raised allegations of plagiarism against five of Gay’s eleven published papers.

You're really invested in her failing, aren't you? I wonder why that is.

She’s already failed. She’s an incompetent diversity hire. Now the entire world knows.

Awesome! Now that the GOP has exposed Gay as an “incompetent diversity hire,” let’s see who else you can expose. Why stop here. It’s not really about protecting Jewish people for you, is it? It’s about a lot more than that.

DP. Of course it's not *just* about protecting Jewish people. It's also about exposing the left's utter and complete hypocrisy when it comes to free speech (and so many other things).

Let's not forget: Harvard considers "cisheterosexism" (whatever the hell that made up word is supposed to mean) and "fatphobia" to "perpetuate violence." It also qualifies using the "wrong" pronouns as "abuse." Yet amidst this complete nuttery, they clearly do NOT consider hatred toward Jews to be perpetuating violence or abuse. I'm all for exposing these fools for exactly who they are, and they have done a bang-up job of that all by themselves.

Yes, exactly. This graphic was produced at Harvard. This graphic is taught to every Harvard undergrad as part of their Title IX introductory course:



It is toxic and extremely divisive.

Harvard is hardly alone in teaching this sort of divisive, extremist dogma.

Extremism does not belong on campus.

I think much of what is in the wheel is fine. The issue is what is on the outside.

Did anyone catch the recent NYT article on Columbia's school of social work?

It's insane.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/07/opinion/social-work-columbia-ideology.html?mwgrp=c-dbar&unlocked_article_code=1.F00.-K96.ReWjn_eNWE_B&hpgrp=k-abar&smid=url-share

I can't believe the NYT actually printed that. It doesn't support leftist insanity.

Not sure that this is an accurate and complete definition of capitalism:

“a system of economic oppression based on class, private property, competition and individual profit. See also: carceral system, class, inequality, racism.”



This is indoctrination, not education.

I'm a moderate and have long laughed at the RWNJ complaints about the left "taking over" higher education.

But in light of what we've seen in the last month and stuff like the above?

They might be correct. Yuck.