The 8/1 to 7/30 rules or new rules you made up? |
In SY 8/1-7-31 players that are younger than the defined eligibility window are allowed to play up. They could have just said 7/31 and younger are eligible. Adding in the 8/31 date is not necessary. |
You're working double time on behalf of all the fools. In case you haven't seen it recently. Freshman/Sophomore/Junior/Senior classes. Will this hurt my child’s college recruiting process? No. In fact, it is expected to help. College coaches recruit by graduating class (e.g., "Class of 2028"). Aligning club soccer age groups with school grades makes it easier for scouts to evaluate players against their direct academic peers, streamlining the recruiting pathway |
Had that backwards they could have just said 8/1 and younger are eligible. Adding in the 7/31 is not necessary. |
Also comparing against transfers and foreign players. But they said "College coaches evaluate players based on their performance, development, and potential, not the exact age grouping of their club team." Have to be the best player you can be. |
What is easiest for college coaches and what is in the best interests of every individual player will not align. With college coaches evaluating the player and not what age group they are in, there are multiple paths for players to go. |
But college coaches are the ones recruiting for their teams. You can choose whatever path you want but if you're not in front of and available for college coaches in the way they want you to be seen what does it matter? |
Safety issue though. And get advice from parents of December kids in BY, would be surprised if they suggested playing up regardless of skill or maturity. The Age Gap Risk: Because kids start school at different ages, are held back, or skip grades, a single grade level can include children whose ages span 2+ years. Physical Safety: We already see significant physical differences within a standard 12-month age gap. If we were to widen that window to 24+ months (as seen in strict grade-based grouping), the physical disparity becomes dangerous. A "held-back" 13-year-old competing against a young 11-year-old in the same grade poses a real safety concern. Developmental Fairness: When age gaps widen beyond 12 months, the disparity in talent and physical maturity widens considerably. Keeping the grouping within the August 1–July 31 window ensures players compete with and against peers of similar physiological, emotional, and social maturity. |
| Checking back in and it's the exact same thing as hundreds of pages ago - do you ever get tired of arguing the same thing over and over? |
College recruiting is almost all push not pull. Virtually no college coach can just pick and choose who the want (some kids want to stay close to home, some want to move far away, etc.), that's why you have to let them know you are interested. |
Well, if you're not there it also matters -- which is why the misaligned B team player who can make the A team in their age group will do that. |
So many clubs doing at least something someone agrees with -- we ALL get to be right. It's great! |
Its push for you because your making it harder on Aug birthdays by encouraging them to play down a grade. Which makes college coaches instantly pass on the player. For everyone else on a correct grade team, on a top team, at a top club its a matter of choosing which offer to accept. |
Its just a matter of time before clubs group Aug birthdays on their grade in school team. Its easier for the club and sets them up for recruiting. |
Where does it say the college scouts totally disregard the misaligned players? I don't see that. In fact, since the process is streamlined, now they'll have even more time to easily find all players they are interested in. |