Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let's go back a little and look at age guys track record. 1. He jumped on the SY bandwagon early because he wants players to play down. Ended up being right but out of luck not for the reasons he wants 2. He's been trying to start a rumor that ENCL will have GY showcases. Was proven to be an idiot and just didnt understand that because ECNL has a u18/u19 grouping that in SY Junior and Senior year showcases will be GY. 3. Is now trying to reinterrupt the BY to SY change which was done so more players could be on teams with their school grade cohorts. Into Aug and Sept players playing down. Which just recreates BY trapped player issues but on the opposite site of the eligibility window. Clubs and parents will figure it out SY again and Aug birthdays will be rostered on their correct grade in school teams.[/quote]There is no one age person. Only a bunch of people saying SY+60 and youth soccer going grade year is nonsense based on published league rules. People aren't advocating for anything, they are just telling you the rules which you don't like.[/quote] Aug birthdays playing with their grade is 100% allowed by the rules. [/quote]Safety issue though. And get advice from parents of December kids in BY, would be surprised if they suggested playing up regardless of skill or maturity. The Age Gap Risk: Because kids start school at different ages, are held back, or skip grades, a single grade level can include children whose ages span 2+ years. Physical Safety: We already see significant physical differences within a standard 12-month age gap. If we were to widen that window to 24+ months (as seen in strict grade-based grouping), the physical disparity becomes dangerous. A "held-back" 13-year-old competing against a young 11-year-old in the same grade poses a real safety concern. Developmental Fairness: When age gaps widen beyond 12 months, the disparity in talent and physical maturity widens considerably. Keeping the grouping within the August 1–July 31 window ensures players compete with and against peers of similar physiological, emotional, and social maturity.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics