GDS Student Newspaper posts about the horrible incident

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

The school will move on because the truth is obvious to everyone except the few crazies here.

Worked for the Catholic Church as a strategy, until it didn’t.

Wonder if consent summit attendance will dip due to the hypocrisy of it all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MPD may have asked the board to restrict community-wide communications on this back when the MPD investigation began. But there's zero reason that request/instruction should have continued once the MPD investigation was closed. If the family was pushing for a public request for information at that point, the only reason the board could have had for refusing to say anything was to avoid looking bad. Ironic, given what's happened now.

No, they could have reasonably not wanted to add fuel to the fire. This thread is evidence that there are some pretty unhinged obsessives out there. even if they redacted names from the reports there is still a risk of identifying the individuals in the report. I’m not sure what privacy laws would apply but the school would be acting prudently to keep it to keep it confidential. They may have/likely did promise confidentiality to some of the people that they interviewed.

This still doesn't explain why Russel wouldn't share the report with the family. Russel should stop writing for the Atlantic and start taking ethics classes.

It’s a bigger issue than just him, but could be a start.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

I would hope parents and students would not simply allow that to happen. It’s a bad safety culture and the a very bad look.

[Anonymous]

This thread is so far detached from reality. In the real world it is obvious that what could be done was done and that there isn’t a lot left to do on the part of the school. Psychotic ramblings from the person who in every post uses terms like fixer and goes on insane tangents about Epstein…well that’s just happening on this little corner of the internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so far detached from reality. In the real world it is obvious that what could be done was done and that there isn’t a lot left to do on the part of the school. Psychotic ramblings from the person who in every post uses terms like fixer and goes on insane tangents about Epstein…well that’s just happening on this little corner of the internet.

DP

They're not. It isn't. And it isn't clear that any of that is true.

But, I said it before and don't know why it was deleted. There is no reason not to share the 3rd party report with the family. The whole purpose of hiring a 3rd party to write a report is to make the 3rd party the scapegoat for unpleasant news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

I would hope parents and students would not simply allow that to happen. It’s a bad safety culture and the a very bad look.

The school literally took every step that it could take for safety culture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so far detached from reality. In the real world it is obvious that what could be done was done and that there isn’t a lot left to do on the part of the school. Psychotic ramblings from the person who in every post uses terms like fixer and goes on insane tangents about Epstein…well that’s just happening on this little corner of the internet.

Don’t forget “Russel” poster.

[Anonymous]

Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

Don’t have to pretend. Sounds like nothing has actually occurred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anything going to happen here or will the school just move on and pretend nothing has occured?

I would hope parents and students would not simply allow that to happen. It’s a bad safety culture and the a very bad look.

The school literally took every step that it could take for safety culture.

Great, that’s a relief. Please list them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

I think you misspelled “perfectly reasonable behavior”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

I think you misspelled “perfectly reasonable behavior”

The report is just a cover up consultant advising the school how to limit their liability and maintain PR. It is only going to be inflammatory and insulting to the victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course everyone agrees that the true offenders were the family, for being unpopular and complaining, and the boy, who should have kept his mouth shut. Amirite?! Boys will be boys and we all have to protect our investment in the GDS brand.

/s

The family should be provided with the report, redacted if need be.

They will get it in litigation in any event.

Preserving the privilege so that the parents can’t get the report in litigation is precisely why the school isn’t providing it in the first place.

Exactly. Totally scumbag behavior

I think you misspelled “perfectly reasonable behavior”

The report is just a cover up consultant advising the school how to limit their liability and maintain PR. It is only going to be inflammatory and insulting to the victim.

Alleged victim.