Prince Harry and Meghan in Near Catastrophic Car Chase in NYC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this hate is basically proof of everything Harry wrote about.

Or... maybe Harry is the problem. Weird that hate follows him everywhere he goes. The common denominator seems to be him.

No, just proof of so many, SO many really, really very stupid people- the same who are all in to " their own research" and typically confirmation bias supporting the dumb stuff they believe. Throw in social media that fuels and elevates all of it- creating completely false narratives, lies, narratives as if its a soap opera- also something he wrote about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this hate is basically proof of everything Harry wrote about.

Or... maybe Harry is the problem. Weird that hate follows him everywhere he goes. The common denominator seems to be him.

No, just proof of so many, SO many really, really very stupid people- the same who are all in to " their own research" and typically confirmation bias supporting the dumb stuff they believe. Throw in social media that fuels and elevates all of it- creating completely false narratives, lies, narratives as if its a soap opera- also something he wrote about.

Unfortunately Harry is all too willing to feed the narrative with his hysterical and hyperbolic claims of "near catastrophe" drives through the city that are are result of his team's mismanagement and his own bad decisions. He does himself no favors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The original Queen Elizabeth gave a ship to some dude for use in slave trade in exchange for a share of the profits. And that’s just one example- the list goes on.

The original Queen Elizabeth was a Tudor. The current BRF is a branch of the German Hannover royal family (they changed their name after WWI). It’s not the same family, slavery and the empire existed well before they came into the picture. Not saying that they are not racists, just stating the facts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this hate is basically proof of everything Harry wrote about.

Or... maybe Harry is the problem. Weird that hate follows him everywhere he goes. The common denominator seems to be him.

No, just proof of so many, SO many really, really very stupid people- the same who are all in to " their own research" and typically confirmation bias supporting the dumb stuff they believe. Throw in social media that fuels and elevates all of it- creating completely false narratives, lies, narratives as if its a soap opera- also something he wrote about.

Unfortunately Harry is all too willing to feed the narrative with his hysterical and hyperbolic claims of "near catastrophe" drives through the city that are are result of his team's mismanagement and his own bad decisions. He does himself no favors.

Neither H or M are the sharpest tools in the shed. They need a PR overhaul with people with functioning brain cells.

[Anonymous]

I've read/watched all of his books/interviews and I honestly just think the poor guy isn't very smart and is also paranoid. Not a good combo. I do feel for him - I think he believes what he says to be the truth.

[Anonymous]

Cheapskates wanted discount at hotel got turned down and went to stay at friends house for free

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this hate is basically proof of everything Harry wrote about.

Or... maybe Harry is the problem. Weird that hate follows him everywhere he goes. The common denominator seems to be him.

No, just proof of so many, SO many really, really very stupid people- the same who are all in to " their own research" and typically confirmation bias supporting the dumb stuff they believe. Throw in social media that fuels and elevates all of it- creating completely false narratives, lies, narratives as if its a soap opera- also something he wrote about.

Unfortunately Harry is all too willing to feed the narrative with his hysterical and hyperbolic claims of "near catastrophe" drives through the city that are are result of his team's mismanagement and his own bad decisions. He does himself no favors.

Neither H or M are the sharpest tools in the shed. They need a PR overhaul with people with functioning brain cells.

Yes. Why, why did they do this?? Megan had plenty of pics in the pretty gold dress, an award, Gloria Steinem beaming. Why muck all this up with bizarre statements of near-death experiences? I don't get it. (I mean I'm amused. Highly.) But why? I don't think "attention whoring" is really a reason. This is such a black eye for them. I really think they can't help themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't believe this is the top article at the NYTimes: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/17/nyregion/harry-meghan-car-chase.html. And Harry/Meghan are being excoriated in the comments... at the Times. Obviously, no one believes the story.

Wow. Public opinion of them in the US has really changed. At the time of Oprah ppl were just lapping up everything they said.

Not true. They are hated here by online troll and monarchists there. The account here is being twisted, no mention of chase before cab ride, twisted words ( no one ever said high speed chase), etc. They didn't do anything wrong. They were chased, they didn't want people at their door step, they didn't exaggerate anything. But all the trolls are. The interesting thing isn't the incident, it's the aftermath, just like the book. It's you, not them. You'll eventually get tired of it. Now go watch Kate play the palace piano for 30 seconds in a gown. Then go get a hobby.

Huh? The whole thing started because of their *own* statement about a “near catastrophic car chase”:

”Last night, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Ms. Ragland were involved in a near catastrophic car chase at the hands of a ring of highly aggressive paparazzi,” the couple’s spokesperson said.

“This relentless pursuit, lasting over two hours, resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD officers.”

And it was accurate. Note all the hyperbole trolls put in that wasn't actually ever in the press release. No high speed chase. Yes, it was 2 hours, yes there were 2 NYPD officers. No one there were actual collisions. You are accusing them of lying about things that were never said.

They did say it was "near catastrophic". You want hyperbole? This is it.

It was near catastrophic for the pedestrians that were pushed off the sidewalk due to the motorcyclists driving in the wrong direction. Ask me how I know that a pedestrian can be killed by a reckless motorcyclist.

I somehow doubt that either of the Sussexes gives a rat's derriere about pedestrians.

Also, wasn't it their (first) vehicle that was booked for reckless driving? (Think that reporting was back on like, page 8...) Not the paparazzi? I'm sure they will say their hand was forced by the pap's antics. But there seems to be plenty of crap driving and disregard for the "little people" to go around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've read/watched all of his books/interviews and I honestly just think the poor guy isn't very smart and is also paranoid. Not a good combo. I do feel for him - I think he believes what he says to be the truth.

This would make him easy to control and manipulate also.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The original Queen Elizabeth gave a ship to some dude for use in slave trade in exchange for a share of the profits. And that’s just one example- the list goes on.

Honestly so what. This entire United States was built on slavery in much more recent times than that and I don’t see them going on national television denigrating the US for its abundant structural racism.

Yeah but no one in the U.S. is doing this currently

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the end they walked home.

Praying that someone would recognize them.

"We want privacy! NO. WE DEMAND PRIVACY!”

Nope they never said that either. Another twisted out of context lie.

It was a tongue in cheek comment. I know that you don't know what this means but Google can help. Ignorance is not bliss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the end they walked home.

Praying that someone would recognize them.

"We want privacy! NO. WE DEMAND PRIVACY!”

Nope they never said that either. Another twisted out of context lie.

It was a tongue in cheek comment. I know that you don't know what this means but Google can help. Ignorance is not bliss.

Every time you folks get caught in a blatant lie about H&M, you claim that you were being “tongue in cheek” or that you were joking.

You are all full of literal shit. 😆😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've read/watched all of his books/interviews and I honestly just think the poor guy isn't very smart and is also paranoid. Not a good combo. I do feel for him - I think he believes what he says to be the truth.

This would make him easy to control and manipulate also.

Then neither of you actually read anything regarding him, the recent history of the Royals, or really anything. Still making up s#!++

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The original Queen Elizabeth gave a ship to some dude for use in slave trade in exchange for a share of the profits. And that’s just one example- the list goes on.

Honestly so what. This entire United States was built on slavery in much more recent times than that and I don’t see them going on national television denigrating the US for its abundant structural racism.

Yeah but no one in the U.S. is doing this currently

Ikr? Liberals in the US just trash local customs in other countries. Because they're tolerant.

[Anonymous]

It's unhealthy to feel so offensive or defensive about a thread about random celebrities. Obsessed cult and opposing squad, neither is rational. Its fine to have opinions about their conduct or motives, or to like or dislike them, loving and hating is where you need to draw the line.

You are immaterial for celebrities, they earn from both type of clicks. All publicity is good publicity.