Fairfax Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok I have spoken to police and know the Banfield family very well so I clearly can state that it is ridiculous. Anyone that believes the majority of these posts need to wake up. BTW police do not give inside information on an active investigation.

And if they did, don't you think that reporters would wind of this and start quoting their anonymous sources? And yet nothing has been reported.

*get wind of

[Anonymous]

Exactly! Nothing new has been updated or reported since the police press conference late in the day this tragedy occurred.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok I have spoken to police and know the Banfield family very well so I clearly can state that it is ridiculous. Anyone that believes the majority of these posts need to wake up. BTW police do not give inside information on an active investigation.

they don't give inside information to anyone they think knows the murderer. They may give information that is limited when questioning people or keeping family or close friends informed about the investigation. Nothing that would affect the case but certainly things that support the investigation must be said to people who might help them be informed. BTW you don't know much about this investigation, and your posts speak volumes in that direction.

[Anonymous]

Omg this keeps getting even more far fetched if you think the police give any information freely on a case like this, regardless of who you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omg this keeps getting even more far fetched if you think the police give any information freely on a case like this, regardless of who you are.

no its not. An example being they gave information that all parties knew each other. Another tidbit is giving the information about who called who and when Joe arrived at the house. Also how the parties knew each other, yes they told people that they knew each and had previous contact. YES they did this because they had to ask the next questions up. This is common practice in any investigation. You clearly don't get how investigations work. I can NOT give away on a forum deep personal information that might harm the case. I wont do that.

[Anonymous]

All the information you restated was said at the police press conference on the day of the tragedy. That is nothing new. Whatever agenda you are pushing is crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg this keeps getting even more far fetched if you think the police give any information freely on a case like this, regardless of who you are.

no its not. An example being they gave information that all parties knew each other. Another tidbit is giving the information about who called who and when Joe arrived at the house. Also how the parties knew each other, yes they told people that they knew each and had previous contact. YES they did this because they had to ask the next questions up. This is common practice in any investigation. You clearly don't get how investigations work. I can NOT give away on a forum deep personal information that might harm the case. I wont do that.

The PP was referring to giving out information that the public was not privy to. It didn't happen in this case despite you repeating that it did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I happen to know someone who knows the husband, as well as a few of his friends. Not saying it makes him guilty of murder, but Brendan is a sketchy, underhanded, deceitful man, as are some of his friends. In the past, he has been known to always expect to get his way and has lied to achieve such expectations. He has defrauded the federal government and maintains friendships with those that are known to do the same thing. His friends and family have been a bunch of crickets, but it could simply mean they have bigger things to worry about than what dcurbanmoms has to say about him. The only people who know what happened that morning were the four adults in the house that day, and tragically, two are no longer with us. Hopefully, there was enough evidence to corroborate Brendan’s story, for his sake. If not, may the person(s) responsible, be brought to justice.

Wow, this is looking more and more each day like the husband murdered his wife and the other guy.

Because some random person on an anonymous website said he heard the husband was a bad guy?

no, you need to read the entire forum I guess, and also watch the chief of police speak about the case and ever report after that. You seem to not see what most other people are seeing and reading. The husband appears more each day that he is guilty. Clearly the investigation is still open because the police think the investigation should be open. It is pretty clear to everyone.

There's been zero news on this case since it initially happened and the FCPD made their statement, so how do you figure the bolded?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I happen to know someone who knows the husband, as well as a few of his friends. Not saying it makes him guilty of murder, but Brendan is a sketchy, underhanded, deceitful man, as are some of his friends. In the past, he has been known to always expect to get his way and has lied to achieve such expectations. He has defrauded the federal government and maintains friendships with those that are known to do the same thing. His friends and family have been a bunch of crickets, but it could simply mean they have bigger things to worry about than what dcurbanmoms has to say about him. The only people who know what happened that morning were the four adults in the house that day, and tragically, two are no longer with us. Hopefully, there was enough evidence to corroborate Brendan’s story, for his sake. If not, may the person(s) responsible, be brought to justice.

Let's ask Brendans friends questions like why didn't he speak to the police right away?
Is he a nice guy at all?
Why did he only have his dog, and not have his wife on a Facebook profile?
Why was there a dropped call when your wife was bleeding out?
Why during a 911 call did you first say "I shot Joe Ryan, before mentioning your wife had been stabbed" ?
Did you have insurance on your wife?

This has always been questionable in my mind. SHE was still showing signs of life and died at the hospital. JR was dead when ambulance arrived. But he wanted to clear himself on the phone first?

I don't think the transcript of the 911 call has been released so how do you know what was said?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would anyone know if Brendan spoke to police on this site if there has been no updates from law enforcement. Can these posts get anymore ridiculous.

some people clearly have inside information that you don't have. YES some have spoken to the police and the police will inform them of things you don't in anyway know. It does not serve you or anyone to keep posting and using the word "ridiculous" just because you are not privy to information others have or know. It won't work to try and discredit everyone that believes the husband is guilty of murder because you call it ridiculous. It is making you simply look continuously uninformed.

Oh come on. No one believes the police have told other people they have spoken to the husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would anyone know if Brendan spoke to police on this site if there has been no updates from law enforcement. Can these posts get anymore ridiculous.

some people clearly have inside information that you don't have. YES some have spoken to the police and the police will inform them of things you don't in anyway know. It does not serve you or anyone to keep posting and using the word "ridiculous" just because you are not privy to information others have or know. It won't work to try and discredit everyone that believes the husband is guilty of murder because you call it ridiculous. It is making you simply look continuously uninformed.

Oh come on. No one believes the police have told other people they have spoken to the husband.

I would and do believe that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I happen to know someone who knows the husband, as well as a few of his friends. Not saying it makes him guilty of murder, but Brendan is a sketchy, underhanded, deceitful man, as are some of his friends. In the past, he has been known to always expect to get his way and has lied to achieve such expectations. He has defrauded the federal government and maintains friendships with those that are known to do the same thing. His friends and family have been a bunch of crickets, but it could simply mean they have bigger things to worry about than what dcurbanmoms has to say about him. The only people who know what happened that morning were the four adults in the house that day, and tragically, two are no longer with us. Hopefully, there was enough evidence to corroborate Brendan’s story, for his sake. If not, may the person(s) responsible, be brought to justice.

Wow, this is looking more and more each day like the husband murdered his wife and the other guy.

Because some random person on an anonymous website said he heard the husband was a bad guy?

no, you need to read the entire forum I guess, and also watch the chief of police speak about the case and ever report after that. You seem to not see what most other people are seeing and reading. The husband appears more each day that he is guilty. Clearly the investigation is still open because the police think the investigation should be open. It is pretty clear to everyone.

There's been zero news on this case since it initially happened and the FCPD made their statement, so how do you figure the bolded?

there are people posting in this forum with inside information, there are also people that knew the victims, and a person that knew the husband. You seem to just want to push your own opinion which I don't personally agree with. I am seeing the husband ad totally guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg this keeps getting even more far fetched if you think the police give any information freely on a case like this, regardless of who you are.

no its not. An example being they gave information that all parties knew each other. Another tidbit is giving the information about who called who and when Joe arrived at the house. Also how the parties knew each other, yes they told people that they knew each and had previous contact. YES they did this because they had to ask the next questions up. This is common practice in any investigation. You clearly don't get how investigations work. I can NOT give away on a forum deep personal information that might harm the case. I wont do that.

During investigations they totally drop small amounts of information so they can get more information. If they had no questions and just let people randomly give whatever thoughts they had no crimes would be solved except through physical evidence. I know you are going to argue this but it doesnt make you right.

[Anonymous]

So what makes your opinion any more valid or true than those who believe the justice system will do their due diligence to close this case. As a person who knows this family and believes the negative and outlandish opinions and wild accusations being made are not in the least factual or even believable. Law enforcement will provide information when the investigation is completed. They do not pick and choose who to give information to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what makes your opinion any more valid or true than those who believe the justice system will do their due diligence to close this case. As a person who knows this family and believes the negative and outlandish opinions and wild accusations being made are not in the least factual or even believable. Law enforcement will provide information when the investigation is completed. They do not pick and choose who to give information to.

The case is not closed, it is fully an OPEN investigation into the deaths of two victims, both Christine, and Joe. The accusations are not wild, and they are factual and you calling them such doesn't make anything true, and it doesn't close the case in the least. You seem to not understand what the word investigation even means. It's not about making a tidy closure so you can feel comfortable with the picture of this couple. It is about finding real justice and about learning the truth and holding the right person or people for murder.